Page 1 of 1

climax on the lux

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2003 3:02 pm
by zerosin
has anybody used these for the front of their lux without any trouble cuase im thinking about it Ive got a dropped crossmember with spring hangers in front and shackle mounts welded under the frame and these are the right length closed,(slightly longer than standard), to keep the geometry right.

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2003 3:03 pm
by Shorty40
DAMN - I thought this was a porn link for sure :D

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2003 7:00 pm
by MissDrew
Both my wife and I have Climaxed on/in my Lux :finger:

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2003 8:17 pm
by taziiy
Aren.t some people lucky Guts

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2003 8:51 pm
by Neilj
Are you defent about that, guts?

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 7:09 pm
by MissDrew
I`d bet my lux on it :finger:

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 8:09 pm
by Neilj
Ahhh, C'mon. Put down something worthwhile!!!!

RE: Another thread

Hope anybody/everybody you know fighting fires is OK. I live a long way south of the fires, but do most of my 4WDing between Falls and Omeo.
Looks pretty devastating.

Neil

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 10:00 pm
by MissDrew
Yep fires are real bad up ere atm.

Also I myself wouldn`t waste my time with revolers/climax etc shackels.

..

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 1:07 pm
by hypo
dude i dunno how they wood go an a lux rear of the front springs on a lux i think if u got the right spring pax yeah 4 sure but the onther thing 2 look out 4 is they amount of travel u will gain in the front shaft, and also is the steerin gunna handle a climax up front.


but i have heard of the yanks runnin the revolvers up front with excellent results so i guess that i climax will be similar it will just bind up quicker than than a revolver

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 1:24 pm
by bj on roids
Guts wrote:Both my wife and I have Climaxed on/in my Lux :finger:

she was fakin it fo sho 8)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 3:03 pm
by N*A*M
bj on roids wrote:
Guts wrote:Both my wife and I have Climaxed on/in my Lux :finger:

she was fakin it fo sho 8)


It's like the two men playing checkers... they weren't playing eachother at the same time! Who's to say they both climaxed in the same session?! :wink:

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 5:45 pm
by Liam
Climaxs are just for the Rear of hiluxs, the front cant take that much travel (tries to tear the torque arm off/ screw it through the diff , and steering issues )

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 7:27 pm
by zerosin
yeh but got no torque bar on the front & high steer so those are no worry ....juz searchin for that extra travel....

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 9:34 pm
by Liam
So without the torque bar , what's it like when you hit the anchors hard?

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 10:11 pm
by MissDrew
With high cross over steering like snake`s high steer it should still pull up straight as the steering doesn`t pull it around anymore.

..

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:27 pm
by hypo
Liam wrote:So without the torque bar , what's it like when you hit the anchors hard?


dont u sell snakes histeer ??

u dont need histeer only crossover and u r able 2 remove the torque bar and it wont do anything stupid.

i ran mine 4 3 months with j-arm steerin and the torque bar removed with absolutely not effect in handling ewen under hard brakes with soft springs

Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2003 7:42 am
by Liam
Yeah we do, the high steer solves the problem of not getting much right lock at full articulation but I can't see how it could stop the castor going wild under hard braking.

Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2003 8:07 am
by Wendle
The castor still changes but the draglink/pitman isn't being pulled by the castor change cause it no longer perpendicular to the axle like the j-arm setup is. The direction of the draglink is what causes the brake-steer, not the castor change.

Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2003 12:26 pm
by bj on roids
Liam wrote:Yeah we do, the high steer solves the problem of not getting much right lock at full articulation but I can't see how it could stop the castor going wild under hard braking.


landcruisers come factory with no torque arm and crossover steering, same front caster, so why doesnt the castor on them go wild under hard braking?

how did toyota ever release this rubbish? oh, you say late model suzis are the same? OMG!! why is that?

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2003 10:22 am
by Guy
Becuase landcrusiers are not shackle reversed, so under brakes they dont get as bigger change in caster. Aslo under brakes with a shackle at the rear weight transfer is more pronounced as the front wheels moves backwards under compression. blah blah
I am most likley talking crap .. but thats the way I understand it..

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2003 1:35 pm
by Liam
how did toyota ever release this rubbish? oh, you say late model suzis are the same? OMG!! why is that?


Shackles are in the front of suzi.
Do a Spring over and shackle reversal on a Cruiser then it'll be like a hilux.

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2003 3:21 pm
by bj on roids
Liam wrote:
how did toyota ever release this rubbish? oh, you say late model suzis are the same? OMG!! why is that?


Shackles are in the front of suzi.
Do a Spring over and shackle reversal on a Cruiser then it'll be like a hilux.


yeah...done, doesn't wobble under braking?

what have i done wrong?
ive got soft springs and soft shocks, spring over, dropped front hanger, shackle reversal.......

i think wendle is right when he says:
"The castor still changes but the draglink/pitman isn't being pulled by the castor change cause it no longer perpendicular to the axle like the j-arm setup is. The direction of the draglink is what causes the brake-steer, not the castor change."

and therefore the crossover steering setup which i have installed is far and above the stock junk!

Re: climax on the lux

Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 1:48 pm
by HiFlex
ive done a shackle reversal on my lux just like the cruizers and absolutely love the setup