Page 1 of 2
??? please help
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 9:09 pm
by hypo
ok here goes. i was playing with the front shckle mounts on satdy and am wondering where i should put it ??
my flat spring length and shackle length r 1295mm + 85mm.
i think that wen my front spring r dead flat that the shackle should b dead flat also, there fore my question is should i put the shackle mount on the chassis 1210mm from the fixed mount in a straight line ??
the pix give more detail..
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 9:18 pm
by OVERKILL ENG
Why do you want the shackle to sit dead flat and also does the spring sit dead flat at rest.
SAM
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 9:25 pm
by hypo
OVERKILL ENGINEERING wrote:Why do you want the shackle to sit dead flat and also does the spring sit dead flat at rest.
SAM
wen they r in the truck and its loaded they will sit with a slight arch
i dont want the shackle sitting flat at rest the 2nd pic is just showing wot it will look like wen flexed up coz i will bump stop it just past negative arch
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 9:27 pm
by hypo
im just trying 2 work out the right measurement from eye 2 eye on the chassis then ill set the springs up 2 sit at the right ride height and that after, i just wanna get the mounts the correct distance apart
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 9:35 pm
by OVERKILL ENG
Your pics won't work for me having trouble still with the broadband so I am trying to visualise. I think everyone would have a different view on this but I would probably run it at 50mm back at ride height you want around the 45 degree angle on your shackle any less of an angle the spring becomes stiffer and less travel.
SAM
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 9:40 pm
by hypo
OVERKILL ENGINEERING wrote:Your pics won't work for me having trouble still with the broadband so I am trying to visualise. I think everyone would have a different view on this but I would probably run it at 50mm back at ride height you want around the 45 degree angle on your shackle any less of an angle the spring becomes stiffer and less travel.
SAM
run wot at 50mm back from wot at ride height ?? wots ya email ill send u the pix
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 9:46 pm
by OVERKILL ENG
I woul;d run the centre of the chassis eye of the shackle 50mm back from the full length of the spring when flat.
Email doesn't work.
SAM
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 9:51 pm
by hypo
OVERKILL ENGINEERING wrote:I woul;d run the centre of the chassis eye of the shackle 50mm back from the full length of the spring when flat.
Email doesn't work.
SAM
so if my flat spring length is 1295(eye2eye) i should mount the shackle end opn the chassis 1245 fron the front fixed mount ??
wot bout the length of the shackle where does that fit in ??
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 10:01 pm
by OVERKILL ENG
YES
Doing a SAS tomorrow will work it out properly on a vehicle.
SAM
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 10:10 pm
by hypo
OVERKILL ENGINEERING wrote:YES
Doing a SAS tomorrow will work it out properly on a vehicle.
SAM
wot bout the 85mm in the length of the shackle ???
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 10:16 pm
by OVERKILL ENG
Can't post pics.
But roughly from the spring eye go back on a 45 dgree angle with a length of 85 mm and as long as the chassis is flat it shoulld be about 50mm. I will measure it up on a hilux tomorrow and work it out properly.
SAM
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 5:44 pm
by redzook
why did u want the shackle dead flat when the spring is dead flat?
so it will give u the most droop possible?
would it hit on your frame? cos that would suck if it did
if you run your chassis mounts 1210 apart then yes your shackle would be dead flat when the spring is dead flat
if you ran your mounts at 1252.5 ur shackle would be at 45degree when the spring is dead flat which i dont think is enuff angle
i would run it at 1232/1235 your shackle would be at around 22.5 degrees when the spring is flat (wich would be pretty close to the shackle angle i have on the rear of mine) and u shouldnt have to worry about the shackle hitting the frame and it would be on a nice angle at ride height
but what the fark would i know

Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 6:12 pm
by hypo
redzook wrote:why did u want the shackle dead flat when the spring is dead flat?
so it will give u the most droop possible?
would it hit on your frame? cos that would suck if it did
COZ THEN WEN THE SPRING IS FLAT THE SHACKLE WILL BE FLAT AND THERE WILL B NO STRESSS ON ANYTHING AND YEAH THE MORE ANGLE I HAVE A REST THE MORE DROOP I WILL HAVE COZ I AM RUNNIN A VERY SHORT SHACKLE 2 MAINTAIN GROUND CLEARENCEif you run your chassis mounts 1210 apart then yes your shackle would be dead flat when the spring is dead flat
YES I KNOW THISif you ran your mounts at 1252.5 ur shackle would be at 45degree when the spring is dead flat which i dont think is enuff angle
CORRECTi would run it at 1232/1235 your shackle would be at around 22.5 degrees when the spring is flat (wich would be pretty close to the shackle angle i have on the rear of mine) and u shouldnt have to worry about the shackle hitting the frame and it would be on a nice angle at ride height
THE SPRING WILL NOT SIT DEAD FLAT AT RIDE HEIGHT, THEY WILL HAVE SOME ARCH BUT WILL B BUMPSTOPPED A LITTLE PAST NEGATIVE ARCH 2 HELP MAINTAIN SPRING LIFE, SO IF WEN THEN SPRING IS DEAD FLAT AND THE SHACKLE IS DEAD FLAT(not agaisnt the frame coz the mount is under it therefore sits away from chassis and will allow enuf room 4 a small bumpstop so that wen the spring goes flat it will rest on this preventin noise) THERE WILL B NO TENSION ON THE SPRING AS IT INVERTS PAST FLAT INTO NEG ARCH AND BACK AGAIN.but what the fark would i know

so does that make any more sence ?? i think i confusing myself ?? or am i going about it all rong ??
should i try runnin a slightly longer shackle and more than 45 degrees at ride height ?? and i slightly flater arch at ride height ??
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 6:17 pm
by redzook
hypolux wrote:redzook wrote:why did u want the shackle dead flat when the spring is dead flat?
so it will give u the most droop possible?
would it hit on your frame? cos that would suck if it did
COZ THEN WEN THE SPRING IS FLAT THE SHACKLE WILL BE FLAT AND THERE WILL B NO STRESSS ON ANYTHING AND YEAH THE MORE ANGLE I HAVE A REST THE MORE DROOP I WILL HAVE COZ I AM RUNNIN A VERY SHORT SHACKLE 2 MAINTAIN GROUND CLEARENCEif you run your chassis mounts 1210 apart then yes your shackle would be dead flat when the spring is dead flat
YES I KNOW THISif you ran your mounts at 1252.5 ur shackle would be at 45degree when the spring is dead flat which i dont think is enuff angle
CORRECTi would run it at 1232/1235 your shackle would be at around 22.5 degrees when the spring is flat (wich would be pretty close to the shackle angle i have on the rear of mine) and u shouldnt have to worry about the shackle hitting the frame and it would be on a nice angle at ride height
THE SPRING WILL NOT SIT DEAD FLAT AT RIDE HEIGHT, THEY WILL HAVE SOME ARCH BUT WILL B BUMPSTOPPED A LITTLE PAST NEGATIVE ARCH 2 HELP MAINTAIN SPRING LIFE, SO IF WEN THEN SPRING IS DEAD FLAT AND THE SHACKLE IS DEAD FLAT(not agaisnt the frame coz the mount is under it therefore sits away from chassis and will allow enuf room 4 a small bumpstop so that wen the spring goes flat it will rest on this preventin noise) THERE WILL B NO TENSION ON THE SPRING AS IT INVERTS PAST FLAT INTO NEG ARCH AND BACK AGAIN.but what the fark would i know

so does that make any more sence ?? i think i confusing myself ?? or am i going about it all rong ??
should i try runnin a slightly longer shackle and more than 45 degrees at ride height ?? and i slightly flater arch at ride height ??
what is your question ?
ya seem to have figured out that u want the shackle flat when the spring is flat so mount it at 1210?

Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 6:18 pm
by zooki
I played around with shackle angles on my zook when I was trying out different spring combos and found that to much shackle angle, even 45deg made the springs very soft and they would lose their height very quickly, changing to a more vertical angle I guess about 30deg has worked a lot better and doesn't seem to affect travel much at all
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 6:21 pm
by hypo
redzook wrote:what is your question ?
ya seem to have figured out that u want the shackle flat when the spring is flat so mount it at 1210?

well i just want some opinions, am i thinkin the right way or not ??
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 6:23 pm
by hypo
zooki wrote:I played around with shackle angles on my zook when I was trying out different spring combos and found that to much shackle angle, even 45deg made the springs very soft and they would lose their height very quickly, changing to a more vertical angle I guess about 30deg has worked a lot better and doesn't seem to affect travel much at all
ok cool, so wen u say lose height quickly, how mucha nd how fast we talking ??? wood they bend backwards or just lose an inch or so and stay there ??
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 6:30 pm
by MissDrew
My rear springs are approx 1500mm long when flat, the shackel is 165mm long and the 2 frame mounts are 1350mm apart in a straight line (not following the curve in the frame).
When my lux is comp ready (as in has spares and spare tyre etc on tray) the rear springs sit all but flat and the shackels are at approx 225 to 220 degrees (8 o clock). When the spring compressors the shackels only move back a poofteenth then they come forward again as the springs are going into negitive camber. When the springs are drooping the shackels move forward to approx 175 to 170 deg (5 o clock)
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 6:36 pm
by hypo
yeah thanx Guts, sounds like how the back of mine works ATM
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 6:39 pm
by MissDrew
Refering to your 2nd pic Ben, I tried this with my current rear springs and it didn`t work, with just me jumping on the tray the shackel would go back and sit against the frame and wouldn`t come back unless I lifted the rear of the lux and took some wieght off the springs. If you were to mount the frame end of the shackel at 1210mm you`d need the shackels at (guessing) 120mm.
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 6:41 pm
by 4sum4
OVERKILL ENGINEERING wrote:Can't post pics.
But roughly from the spring eye go back on a 45 dgree angle with a length of 85 mm and as long as the chassis is flat it shoulld be about 50mmwill measure it up on a hilux tomorrow and work it out properly.
SAM
85mm eye to eye shackle should work out at near 60mm
I think

Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 6:42 pm
by MissDrew
So with your 85mm shackel I`d mount it at around 1255mm (But I`d be doing what you are doing now and get other people`s opnion 1st)
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 6:44 pm
by zooki
hypolux wrote:zooki wrote:I played around with shackle angles on my zook when I was trying out different spring combos and found that to much shackle angle, even 45deg made the springs very soft and they would lose their height very quickly, changing to a more vertical angle I guess about 30deg has worked a lot better and doesn't seem to affect travel much at all
ok cool, so wen u say lose height quickly, how mucha nd how fast we talking ??? wood they bend backwards or just lose an inch or so and stay there ??
With a 45 deg angle new springs would lose about 1 inch in 3 months with the angle more vertical the old reset springs I put in have gonr that long and not dropped any
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 6:45 pm
by MissDrew
You could allways fine tune it later with a longer or shorter shackel.
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 6:56 pm
by 4sum4
my front springs are flat and the shackle is at 45deg with 85mm shackle and I`m getting full 14" of down travel with out opening the clamps and the springs are shorter than yours,There`ve sagged about half an inch at first and but have`nt sagged any more not bad for 22 year old leafs.
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 7:02 pm
by hypo
Guts wrote:So with your 85mm shackel I`d mount it at around 1255mm (But I`d be doing what you are doing now and get other people`s opnion 1st)
yeah was thinking something like that after read the thread again..
4sum yeah good points..
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 11:16 pm
by hypo
weill i think i gunna go with guts and put it at around 1255mm unless some1 else has anything different ??
Posted: Tue May 04, 2004 6:10 am
by redzook
hypolux wrote:weill i think i gunna go with guts and put it at around 1255mm unless some1 else has anything different ??
your shackle angle wont go past 45degrees and it would almost be straight up and down at ride height
Posted: Tue May 04, 2004 8:04 am
by Wendle
4sum4 wrote:OVERKILL ENGINEERING wrote:Can't post pics.
But roughly from the spring eye go back on a 45 dgree angle with a length of 85 mm and as long as the chassis is flat it shoulld be about 50mmwill measure it up on a hilux tomorrow and work it out properly.
SAM
85mm eye to eye shackle should work out at near 60mm
I think

yep 60.1mm
pythagoras yourself senseless on an 85 x85 right angled triangle and you'll get 120.208... half that figure is the offset hypo is after.
i don't know anything about leaf springs, but here is some more accurate maths to work with.

Posted: Tue May 04, 2004 10:59 am
by hypo
Wendle wrote:4sum4 wrote:OVERKILL ENGINEERING wrote:Can't post pics.
But roughly from the spring eye go back on a 45 dgree angle with a length of 85 mm and as long as the chassis is flat it shoulld be about 50mmwill measure it up on a hilux tomorrow and work it out properly.
SAM
85mm eye to eye shackle should work out at near 60mm
I think

yep 60.1mm
pythagoras yourself senseless on an 85 x85 right angled triangle and you'll get 120.208... half that figure is the offset hypo is after.
i don't know anything about leaf springs, but here is some more accurate maths to work with.

nice so u think somewhere between 1215 and 1220 ??