mmm internet
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:12 pm
fab is fun
I think its looks very
and 10 points for originality.Page 1 of 3
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:15 pm
Will the rear door have rounded window corners?
I think its looks very and 10 points for originality.
I think its looks very
and 10 points for originality.Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:26 pm
i think the back doors need to be a bit bigger and it would look better .
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:30 pm
x2, another 6inches maybe, big kudos for been originalmicka1 wrote:i think the back doors need to be a bit bigger and it would look better .
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:34 pm
Yes the rear door will have factory radius's on all windows.Taff wrote:Will the rear door have rounded window corners?
I think its looks very
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:35 pm
No point being any bigger as there is no where to go after that as the rear shock hoopes sit behind the rear seat and the rear seat bacj is in line with the profile.micka1 wrote:i think the back doors need to be a bit bigger and it would look better .
Wheel base is out at 104" and won't be going any further.
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:54 pm
Very cool. Should be great when done.
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:57 pm
Do it, just don't weld to the chassis.
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:17 pm
hehe to late already have ... but it wasn't with square plates and side stepslump_a_charcoal wrote:Do it, just don't weld to the chassis.
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:09 pm
HELL YEAH!
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:42 pm
I think it'd look better with a longer rear door, wether pointless or notSteelArt wrote:No point being any bigger as there is no where to go after that as the rear shock hoopes sit behind the rear seat and the rear seat bacj is in line with the profile.micka1 wrote:i think the back doors need to be a bit bigger and it would look better .
Wheel base is out at 104" and won't be going any further.
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:07 pm
sorry mate , still believe the rear door should be longer by at least 2 , 3 - 4 inches .. and also think it should have a solid rear side window .
apart from that it looks good . and also what sort of drive train are you running and intended use were you after ?
apart from that it looks good . and also what sort of drive train are you running and intended use were you after ?
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 12:33 am
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:14 am
Damnit man, forget about the bog, the zombie blue heelers are here - run for the hills!
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:41 am
awesome =) what colour are you going to paint it at the end???
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:14 am
Probably the same colour as the rest of it. 
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 1:00 pm
That looks excellent. Well done.
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 1:10 pm
i love the look of this and can't wait to see it completed. I've seen the odd one or two dual cab utes done from cut down troopy's and extended 40's but can't wait to see this done
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 1:18 pm
Great concept, but as others say, I think it will look better if you can make the door longer, even it means shortening the rear window.
Cheers
Cheers
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 1:51 pm
I can't see these images but I would like to!
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:38 pm
SteelArt wrote:
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:03 pm
That rocks. But the back doors should open backwards... and no pillars in between 
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:04 pm
i know it sounds crazy and NFI if theres room with a 3b i know there isnt with a 2f but if you moved the front 1/2 of the body forward by 100mm it would make the front wheels sit more centered in the guard and give the door a extra 100mm making it look better proportioned
tho either way will look sweet
tho either way will look sweet
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:21 am
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:24 am
Not really the room for it.pcman wrote:i know it sounds crazy and NFI if theres room with a 3b i know there isnt with a 2f but if you moved the front 1/2 of the body forward by 100mm it would make the front wheels sit more centered in the guard and give the door a extra 100mm making it look better proportioned
tho either way will look sweet
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:25 am
Visually it looks more like the rear axle wants to go back a touch. But I am not saying it would be worth the effort, what you're doing lookes fricking cool anyway.
Don't get me wrong I am just responding to the comment above, not being picky and nosey!
Don't get me wrong I am just responding to the comment above, not being picky and nosey!
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:27 am
I would not have posted it if I didn't want feedback. Good / Bad or stupid it all helps in getting where I want it to be, so thanks for your comments.chimpboy wrote:Visually it looks more like the rear axle wants to go back a touch. But I am not saying it would be worth the effort, what you're doing lookes fricking cool anyway.
Don't get me wrong I am just responding to the comment above, not being picky and nosey!
I agree in the pictures that the rear needs to go back further, in reality the flare sits a little further forward but it is still touch and go.
Once I have finished the inner pillars and foot well I will look at it and see if it needs to go back some more.
For now it will stay as the links are made and I said I wanted 104" wheel base and that is what I have.
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:59 am
ON the first pics I thought the door/ply looked far too short, but i think in this photo it is further back - may have been how you always planned but it didnt appear the same with the ply.SteelArt wrote:chimpboy wrote:I can't see these images but I would like to!
I think it looks
as you have it in this pic, cant wait to see it finished.Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:06 pm
Thats sweetSteelArt wrote:chimpboy wrote:I can't see these images but I would like to!
Well done on doing something different and making it that cool
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:06 pm
are those blue bits from my 40 Brad? I thought they look familiar..SteelArt wrote:chimpboy wrote:I can't see these images but I would like to!