Page 1 of 1
rear springs up front
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 3:44 pm
by zerosin
done a search on this and everyone says yeh thats the way to go but no one is saying which ones???
pre 88 47" long seems most likely but is anyone doin it with the later ifs rears 52" long
got me a sas ready to go 'ceptin for the springs
any help much appreciated
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 6:51 pm
by bubs
47s dude
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 6:53 pm
by NICK
i disagree bubs,
if you are doing a solid swap i would fit the longer ones, it really isnt any more hassel.
NICK
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 7:35 pm
by bubs
think of the approach angle you would lose
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 7:37 pm
by NICK
arnt they the same lenght or very similar, on the short side?
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 7:44 pm
by bubs
2in on the short side
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 7:56 pm
by NICK
yeah thats right, now i remember. Whizzy has IFS rears all round and had to build the hangers forward 2 inch and then redrill the spring pearch to get the axle foward, without trimming or any other major mod you cant run bigger than 35's with IFS rears in the front, but they do flex awesome.
NICK
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 7:58 pm
by RUFF
If you are going to talk like you know what you are on about get it right at least Bubs
They are 1.5" longer on the sghort side and with the axle farward on the perch they can be made exactly the same.
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:02 pm
by bubs
i was ment to say about - and you told me 2in :wink:
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:10 pm
by NICK
bubs wrote:i was ment to say about - and you told me 2in :wink:
i believe you, tony always gets it wrong, 8inches, 2 rolls, 1 flop, 38's, 550
NICK
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:15 pm
by RUFF
You are stoned Bubs i never said 2" my rear axle is back 1.5" on the IFS rears.
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:25 pm
by bubs
i am postive you said to me last year "my rear axle went backwards
about 2in" now i left out the about
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:30 pm
by NICK
bubs wrote:i am postive you said to me last year "my rear axle went backwards
about 2in" now i left out the about
bubs, you know your in a whole and your creditibility is out the window, and now you continue to dig yourself deeper
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:35 pm
by bubs
NICK wrote:bubs wrote:i am postive you said to me last year "my rear axle went backwards
about 2in" now i left out the about
bubs, you know your in a whole and your creditibility is out the window, and now you continue to dig yourself deeper
damn and i thought i was padding
OK - i am wrong it is 1.5" - i thought it was 2" i was wrong i will admit defeat this time only
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:39 pm
by NICK
bubs wrote:NICK wrote:bubs wrote:i am postive you said to me last year "my rear axle went backwards
about 2in" now i left out the about
bubs, you know your in a whole and your creditibility is out the window, and now you continue to dig yourself deeper
damn and i thought i was padding
OK - i am wrong it is 1.5" - i thought it was 2" i was wrong i will admit defeat this time only
is that about 1.5, because i believe that it is 1 3/4 which is more like 2
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:42 pm
by bubs
it also depends on wether you are running sagged springs :wink:
or maybe it is like at my work 1 5/8" chain - is called 1.654