Page 1 of 1

P76 Vs 4.6

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 12:43 am
by GURU
G'day all,

what would be a better conversion? 4.6 would be carby running gas.

Can most of the 3.5 stuff bolt onto the 4.6?

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 7:14 am
by RUFF
The 4.6 as finding a good 4.4 is getting hard. Most of them have had problems with the sleaves by now.

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 4:06 pm
by landy_man
and try finding a crank for a P76...
a few of us were discussing it the other night....
I don't reckon it is worth going for the p76... the initial outlay for the engine is low.... but they can start adding up in build cost very quickly....

Just ask TUFFRR ;)

Rover all the way for me

Re: P76 Vs 4.6

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 4:50 pm
by mickrangie
DAS wrote:G'day all,

what would be a better conversion? 4.6 would be carby running gas.

Can most of the 3.5 stuff bolt onto the 4.6?


All the parts from yr 3.5 will bolt right up to a p76 and a 4.6 so the choce is yrs really..

all i know that with a 4.4 yr extractors hit the cassis and are a HUGE PITA to get on and off... the plates for the inlet manafold is also a PITA to install get right....

then you have to grind head on pass side to get alternator on right and then it throw the power steering pump out a little so wear on belts could become a problem later down the track....

heaps of other fings that were PITA but if you going to run carbbies then you shouldn't have these problems...

installing a 4.6 you will need a $13 plate for the cam to keep it from moving in and out...

also on some builds the crank can hit the oil pan so a little lovin with a hammer will fix...

apart from those few little PITA's all is good and fits right on

HTH

Mick

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 5:47 pm
by Aquarangie
Was thinking about a 4.6 conversion myself a few years down the track, but having second thoughts now :?:

I'll stick with my 3.9. At least I know it will go straight in as I don't have the patience to :bad-words: around with it :!: :!:

Regards,

Trav