Page 1 of 1
rover vs buick motor
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 10:51 am
by custom hauler
hey guys pretty new to the rover seen but am loving every minuite of it
by far the most enjoyable car ive eva owned.
ive run into a problem but. because ive been brought up around hot rodders and drag racers im kinda addicted to power as well
and lets face it the lil 3.5 twin carb 8 lacks quite substantially in this department
now ive recently cum to the realisation that the rover 3.5 and the buick / olds 215ci alloy block share the same manifolds
my question is how similar are these motors? ive been doing sum reasearch and they managed to take a 215ci out to a 298ci
which works out to be 4.9L instead of the 3.5. not only would the capacity jump make a difference but so would the fact it pumps it up to 10.25:1 compression ratio
so if anyone knows how different are the rover 3.5's to the buick 215's???
cheers sam
Re: rover vs buick motor
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:20 pm
by ISUZUROVER
The rover/leyland motors are available in 3.5, 3.9/4.0, 4.4, 4.6. There are also aftermarket versions which go out to 5.2 or more.
A few of the guys on pirate4x4 have done lots of research on which chev/olds parts can be used in a rover. Also there are quite a few on aulro who know this stuff.
Re: rover vs buick motor
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:39 pm
by 3DrDisco
I'm in the middle of using some Buick parts to build up a 3.9 Rover Block. I'm using the Buick Crank to stroke it out to 4.8 will be using 4.6 heads (slightly worked
![Twisted Evil :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
), intake manifold and plenum. Hopefully will go alright.
Talk to Mark and D&D Fabrications. I'm pretty sure D&D were the ones that first started using Buick parts with Rover blocks, though I might be mistaken. I just received a whole heap of parts from him and he is really good to deal with, although a bit tough to get hold of on email as he only answers emails from home after hours. It sometimes may take a couple of days for a response, but once he knows your serious he is quick to respond.
Re: rover vs buick motor
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:41 pm
by garrycol
[quote="3DrDisco"]I'm in the middle of using some Buick parts to build up a 3.9 Rover Block. I'm using the Buick Crank to stroke it out to 4.8 will be using 4.6 heads (slightly worked
![Twisted Evil :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
), intake manifold and plenum. Hopefully will go alright.
Talk to Mark and D&D Fabrications. I'm pretty sure D&D were the ones that first started using Buick parts with Rover blocks, though I might be mistaken. I just received a whole heap of parts from him and he is really good to deal with, although a bit tough to get hold of on email as he only answers emails from home after hours. It sometimes may take a couple of days for a response, but once he knows your serious he is quick to respond.[/quote]
I am thinking of doing the same with a spare 3.9 that I have, but have no idea where do get parts and advice etc - who are D & D Fabrications? I was following this article.
http://www.britishv8.org/Articles/Affor ... ker-V8.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Garry
Re: rover vs buick motor
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:01 pm
by Bush65
I have an article in an old hot rod magazine about building the buick/olds 215 aluminium engine (which rover purchased tooling for and lead to the rover V8) with buick 300 components (heads, crank, etc.). It mentions D&D fabrications in the USA).
I'll see if I can post copies of the article over the W.E.
Edit: the following pics are the relevant pages. Note mag published in 1986 and most of this info (probably more up to date) is in the tech pages of the D&D Fabs website
http://www.aluminumv8.com/tech/tech.htm &
http://www.aluminumv8.com/tech/increasedisplacement.htm
The D&D Fabs site contains most
![Image](http://i600.photobucket.com/albums/tt84/bushie39/Rover%20V8/P165.jpg)
Re: rover vs buick motor
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:06 pm
by ISUZUROVER
http://www.aluminumv8.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: rover vs buick motor
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:22 pm
by uninformed
i have read that the limiting factors with the rover V8's are the heads and their port design. Wildcat V8 in the uk produce some very trick ($$$) stuff including their own cast heads.....I also read somewhere that a company in the USA recently took over a buick V8 parts company and is going to produce their own heads similar to wildcat but less expensive....
I cant remember the name of the USA company...does anyone know about this
cheers,
Serg
Re: rover vs buick motor
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 8:48 pm
by 3DrDisco
uninformed wrote:i have read that the limiting factors with the rover V8's are the heads and their port design. Wildcat V8 in the uk produce some very trick ($$$) stuff including their own cast heads.....I also read somewhere that a company in the USA recently took over a buick V8 parts company and is going to produce their own heads similar to wildcat but less expensive....
I cant remember the name of the USA company...does anyone know about this
cheers,
Serg
This is similar to what Mark told me also. I had to have the pistons machined down to suit use with the rover heads. He put me on to RPI Engineering in the U.K where I brought their Stage 3 Valve kit. I will have them installed and have a bit of work on the Rover heads so hopefully will go okay.
I think the biggest issue with using the Buick crank is having a flywheel that will suit. AFAIK D&D are the only ones that make something to suit.
Re: rover vs buick motor
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:47 pm
by awright
I know one of the major differences was the heads. From memory the Buick Skylark heads will actually give you more engine volume but lower comp. Fine for a blower or turbo but also getting very hard to get and expensiv-ish A while ago I looked into it and finally found a guy in the states who had a set and then needed re-co but wanted $500 usd (about $450 AUD these days) but back then it was about $800 AUD plus shipping! I think it gave another .2L So you could get up to 5.4 out of it in total.
Re: rover vs buick motor
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:24 am
by red90
TA Performance is in the process of building an all new HP head at lower cost...
http://www.v8buick.com/showthread.php?t=172229" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wizkid45/s ... 480262913/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: rover vs buick motor
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:13 am
by uninformed
Thanks red90,
thats the company I was referring to.
Serg
Re: rover vs buick motor
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:39 pm
by Loanrangie
custom hauler wrote:hey guys pretty new to the rover seen but am loving every minuite of it
by far the most enjoyable car ive eva owned.
ive run into a problem but. because ive been brought up around hot rodders and drag racers im kinda addicted to power as well
and lets face it the lil 3.5 twin carb 8 lacks quite substantially in this department
now ive recently cum to the realisation that the rover 3.5 and the buick / olds 215ci alloy block share the same manifolds
my question is how similar are these motors? ive been doing sum reasearch and they managed to take a 215ci out to a 298ci
which works out to be 4.9L instead of the 3.5. not only would the capacity jump make a difference but so would the fact it pumps it up to 10.25:1 compression ratio
so if anyone knows how different are the rover 3.5's to the buick 215's???
cheers sam
Essentially the buick/rover are the same casting for the block with a couple of vital exceptions, the buick went to the BOP (buick/olds/pontiac) bellhousing pattern whereas the rover still used the pre1964 pattern. A lot of buick V8 parts right up to the buick 350V8 (not chev ) can be used on a 3.5 also some Buick V6 parts will fit.