Page 1 of 3
4PLAYOFFROAD Creations
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:38 pm
by moose
finally took the camera down to 4PLAY,s workshop !!
the lil' blue LJ 50/80
consists of
1.6 EFI
auto
sierra centres , with lockers , front & rear
Vitara dash & steering coloumn
rear disc,s
SPOA
sierra x-case
& more !!
the coil LWB zook has
coil front , with OME LTR shocks
1.6 EFI
Auto
twin transfers
4.6 diffs , lockers ..front & rear
A-frame coil rear
custom cab
& more !!!!
(pics to follow !!!)
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:40 pm
by bigsteve
Old news is so exiting
Now post the damn pics!!!!!
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:42 pm
by *BESTY*
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:43 pm
by moose
bigsteve wrote:Old news is so exiting
Now post the damn pics!!!!!
taddaa !!
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:45 pm
by *BESTY*
sorry 'bout the delay in posting the pics bigsteve
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:49 pm
by moose
they have both been built in accordance of engineering & legality !
(just 4 yug , tyres not included !!!
)
the LJ , only has to get a new rear cage section ,
to mount the retractable seat belts !!!
then its all done !!!
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:53 pm
by Guy
moose wrote:they have both been built in accordance of engineering & legality !the LJ , only has to get a new rear cage section ,
to mount the retractable seat belts !!!
then its all done !!!
Swampers and all ???
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:55 pm
by moose
oh OK , not with swampers !!!
but who runs the tyres they were engineered with ??
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:55 pm
by *BESTY*
The swampers aren't the new treads for the LJ....it will be running Siverstone MT-117's !
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:59 pm
by grimbo
How is Joe planning on opening the rear door if he uses any sort of tray?
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 4:00 pm
by Guy
moose wrote:oh OK , not with swampers !!!
but who runs the tyres they were engineered with ??
wasn't trying to be picky .. I was just looking out for Greg .. He would have pooped his pants and passed out if that had been the case ...
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 4:07 pm
by *BESTY*
grimbo wrote:How is Joe planning on opening the rear door if he uses any sort of tray?
My guess is with a gas axe once he welds it shut
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 4:09 pm
by moose
other toys from there include...
Victors car .. SWB hardtop
1.6 EFI
twin transfers
SPOA
33" claws
disc rear
Cams SWB Softtop
1.75 carby , (soon to be throttle body injected !!)
twin transfers
4.6 diffs , lockers front & rear
dropped suspension , (all mounts have been lowered 30mm , on seperate frame)
scissor shackles , pinned for onroad !!
he,s also doing a
1.6 Baleno swap , SWB zook
4spd Auto 1.6 , Jimny
& a few other things !!
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 4:10 pm
by moose
grimbo wrote:How is Joe planning on opening the rear door if he uses any sort of tray?
tilt tray !!!
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:21 pm
by Squik
oooooooooo!!! That LJ is soooooooo cuuute!!!.............Greg...honey....sweetie......darling......
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:28 pm
by fightara
LJ wants ROPS
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 7:26 am
by moose
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 8:16 am
by *BESTY*
R oll O ver P rotection S ystem
6 point or 4 ???
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 2:12 pm
by Mudzuki
Nice, any pics of the other cars mentioned?
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 2:17 pm
by *BESTY*
I'm sure that next time Moose goes to the workshop, he will take his digi camera along
That's it for now
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 2:34 pm
by bigsteve
Take some pics of the tail shafts of these to SWB running duals too
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 2:37 pm
by *BESTY*
bigsteve wrote:Take some pics of the tail shafts of these to SWB running duals too
I'm pretty sure that the rear tailshafts are still longer than a standard TJ Wrangler
Not too many SWB running dual t-cases ........... are you thinking of doing it ??
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 2:41 pm
by bigsteve
Ferozius wrote:bigsteve wrote:Take some pics of the tail shafts of these to SWB running duals too
I'm pretty sure that the rear tailshafts are still longer than a standard TJ Wrangler
Not too many SWB running dual t-cases ........... are you thinking of doing it ??
Just curious of the length/angle.
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 6:31 pm
by greg
bigsteve wrote:Ferozius wrote:bigsteve wrote:Take some pics of the tail shafts of these to SWB running duals too
I'm pretty sure that the rear tailshafts are still longer than a standard TJ Wrangler
Not too many SWB running dual t-cases ........... are you thinking of doing it ??
Just curious of the length/angle.
I think you should do it big steve - you won't have any issues with binding or short tail shaft lengths because you are spring under and have no flex
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 6:33 pm
by redzook
greg wrote:bigsteve wrote:Ferozius wrote:bigsteve wrote:Take some pics of the tail shafts of these to SWB running duals too
I'm pretty sure that the rear tailshafts are still longer than a standard TJ Wrangler
Not too many SWB running dual t-cases ........... are you thinking of doing it ??
Just curious of the length/angle.
I think you should do it big steve - you won't have any issues with binding or short tail shaft lengths because you are spring under and have no flex
why do you melb people want lower gearing? i thought mud=wheelspeed
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 6:47 pm
by greg
redzook wrote:greg wrote:bigsteve wrote:Ferozius wrote:bigsteve wrote:Take some pics of the tail shafts of these to SWB running duals too
I'm pretty sure that the rear tailshafts are still longer than a standard TJ Wrangler
Not too many SWB running dual t-cases ........... are you thinking of doing it ??
Just curious of the length/angle.
I think you should do it big steve - you won't have any issues with binding or short tail shaft lengths because you are spring under and have no flex
why do you melb people want lower gearing? i thought mud=wheelspeed
for the same reason we all want spring overs man - posing
extra gearsticks = extra bling i guess
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 7:45 pm
by bigsteve
greg wrote:bigsteve wrote:Ferozius wrote:bigsteve wrote:Take some pics of the tail shafts of these to SWB running duals too
I'm pretty sure that the rear tailshafts are still longer than a standard TJ Wrangler
Not too many SWB running dual t-cases ........... are you thinking of doing it ??
Just curious of the length/angle.
I think you should do it big steve - you won't have any issues with binding or short tail shaft lengths because you are spring under and have no flex
Aye whos computer did you hijack??
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2004 8:03 am
by moose
I think the rear shaft is only shortened about 10-15 mm !!!
but the jack-shaft between the Vit transfer & the zook transfer becomes a RR rubber coupling !!!!
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2004 8:19 am
by sierrajim
I believe that he is modifing the Vitara transfer case and shortening it considerably.
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2004 8:25 am
by moose
vitarajim wrote:I believe that he is modifing the Vitara transfer case and shortening it considerably.
Yep !!!
you,ve lost me !!!