Page 1 of 1
A Frame Vs. Triangluar 4 link
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 9:45 pm
by 4X4 shorty
I'm sure this topic has been done over and over and over and over anyway give me your 2cent worth just thinking about a new setup on my new project
Re: A Frame Vs. Triangluar 4 link
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:32 pm
by SuperiorEngineering
Their is no information for a real answer to that, generally a triangulated rear end is hard to beat if it set up correctly but you need to give the guys on this forum more info about your truck ,and what you what to achieve with it.
At the moment you have asked how long is a peice of string?
Re: A Frame Vs. Triangluar 4 link
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:16 am
by lukethedork
3-link with A Frame, only because I haven't heard of a Triangluar 4 link before.
But personally I would do a 4 link with triangulation (uppers, lowers or both) to suit your application.
Luke.
Re: A Frame Vs. Triangluar 4 link
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:14 pm
by 4X4 shorty
SuperiorEngineering wrote:Their is no information for a real answer to that, generally a triangulated rear end is hard to beat if it set up correctly but you need to give the guys on this forum more info about your truck ,and what you what to achieve with it.
At the moment you have asked how long is a peice of string?
Sorry a bit of back ground it will be a cut down 40 built for TT build light as possible rear steer running LC diffs with full hydro f&r the wheel base will be 110-115
I did TT this year and for what my truck is i'm happy with it but thought i might start again and get rid of my current truck as its all engineerd and don't want to cut it up to achive what i want.
