Page 1 of 1
Coil Spring Question
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 2:37 pm
by Bartso
at the moment im running a 4 inch spring lft in my GQ is it possible to get springs that sit at the same height it is now but offer more downward travel i know your shocks dictate how far they go but my springs will pop out if i go a longer shock, i have enforcer springs at the moment i know probably not the best i was even thinking going to 5 inch i have heard people using a top hat at the top of the coil for more travel what are everyones opinions
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 2:59 pm
by stool
NICK Mannell welded cones on the inside of the top seat as a spring guides about 3 to 4" in length
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 4:20 pm
by bru21
what you want is a softer longer spring. the downside to this is they drive badly on road and need replacing every year or two as they yeild far easier. they are also harder to obtain.
cheers bru
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 4:25 pm
by Bartso
i was thinking about setting up something like this i take it the bottom of the spring is clamped as well
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 6:09 pm
by Daisy
Bartso wrote:
i was thinking about setting up something like this i take it the bottom of the spring is clamped as well
Macquarie 4x4 did that for the Barlow cruiser
Might pay to give em a call.. i think it was a kit
TOM
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 6:32 pm
by RV80
is that gigantor?
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 6:34 pm
by stool
Yep it is the gig
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 10:04 pm
by duncan
put in the taperd pipes into your upper mounts then raise your lower shock mounts did this on mine extended my bump stops got heaps of travel 4 inch coils come of there seats and slide down the tapperd cones about 3 inches works a treat
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:19 am
by Bartso
duncan wrote:put in the taperd pipes into your upper mounts then raise your lower shock mounts did this on mine extended my bump stops got heaps of travel 4 inch coils come of there seats and slide down the tapperd cones about 3 inches works a treat
can you post a pic of this

Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:42 pm
by bru21
you acheive little by doing this. rather hold your coil to the mount. unless its a ramp rig. i wanted to do a similar thing a while back but it leads to more unstability, unpridictability and little benefit as its only the unsprung weight of the diff touching the ground.
cheers mate bru
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:40 pm
by Bartso
bru21 wrote:you acheive little by doing this. rather hold your coil to the mount. unless its a ramp rig. i wanted to do a similar thing a while back but it leads to more unstability, unpridictability and little benefit as its only the unsprung weight of the diff touching the ground.
cheers mate bru
so bru you reckon its better to just keep the travel i have rather than trying to go for more downward travel im thinking of putting in 5 inch springs in but you know don't want to go to high because of the unstableness of a SWB
just curious how does doing a action of what is above lead to unstability

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:14 am
by duncan
I run this with the bottom of the spring captured and it works well giving heaps of artic down while keeping my 38s out of the guards .Now I run a Aframe rear much nicer and easier to flex again
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:58 am
by bru21
leads to unstability as the diff is no longer held under positivly and the truck is free to rock whithin the free space. its more the jerking of the un sprung diff weight than anything. also on extreme off cambers the car droops more.
cheers
bru