Page 1 of 2

christover went shopping :)

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 7:32 pm
by christover1
only bought the front ones, rears are planned, of course :D

Image

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 7:33 pm
by RB zook
32's ?


nice

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 7:34 pm
by nicbeer
ooooh, I see tread there.

getting sick of the slicks were ya. :D

what $$ are they worth nowdays.

cheers

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 7:36 pm
by christover1
RB zook wrote:32's ?


nice


they are the retreads, named 31's to differentiate from the remould 32's, but they both measure 31...I couldn't see point of remoulds as they are not full remoulds anyway...retreads have softer sidewalls, tho, too. ...christover

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 7:38 pm
by christover1
nicbeer wrote:ooooh, I see tread there.

getting sick of the slicks were ya. :D

what $$ are they worth nowdays.

cheers


got many different quotes, but most had no stock, so was irrelevant...I paid $155 each fitted and balanced.....yep, sick of the slix, been saving fer a while, chrustover

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 7:39 pm
by antt
good stuff mate, you'll love em in the mud ;) :D

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 7:40 pm
by christover1
I'll need a new excuse, now, can't blame the slicks :D christover

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 7:42 pm
by nicbeer
Blame old age. :armsup:

hehehehe

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 7:43 pm
by christover1
antt wrote:good stuff mate, you'll love em in the mud ;) :D


was surprised at the better than expected road handling, time will tell of course...

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 7:44 pm
by christover1
nicbeer wrote:Blame old age. :armsup:

hehehehe


thats ones out, used it too often to account for brilliance :lol:

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 7:49 pm
by antt
christover1 wrote:
antt wrote:good stuff mate, you'll love em in the mud ;) :D


was surprised at the better than expected road handling, time will tell of course...


i wouldn't suggest running them on the road too long, mine have worn down heaps driving too and from our wheeling spots around town, so i try to swap em when i get somewhere instead of running them on the road.

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 8:01 pm
by christover1
antt wrote:
christover1 wrote:
antt wrote:good stuff mate, you'll love em in the mud ;) :D


was surprised at the better than expected road handling, time will tell of course...


i wouldn't suggest running them on the road too long, mine have worn down heaps driving too and from our wheeling spots around town, so i try to swap em when i get somewhere instead of running them on the road.


I am hoping the lightness of me zook helps prevent excessive wear, other tyres I have used got incredible milage, or is it kilometerage,
but I am realistic
:snipersmile: tarmac roads

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 8:15 pm
by droopypete
Way to go Chris :cool:
peter.

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 8:26 pm
by christover1
droopypete wrote:Way to go Chris :cool:
peter.


looks like the diff ratio change is a goer, mocks is in, so that leaves more money for rubber, and less worry of S1 failures....they are very light to steer at 34lbs on road, less tread on road, I suppose..now to chase up some LJ diffs of 4;56 or 4;9 whatever comes, and save fer the rear tyres may be wise :roll:

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 11:17 am
by nicbeer
LJ diff ratios? I guess these only fit into the 1ltr diffs.

cheers

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:32 pm
by christover1
nicbeer wrote:LJ diff ratios? I guess these only fit into the 1ltr diffs.

cheers
that is true, another advantage of little diffs...hoping LJ diffs are strong enuff, time will tell..The 1.0 diffs have stood up well to the 1.3 donk, tho. christover

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:57 pm
by Da Zook
where abouts did u get these tyres mate???

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 2:42 pm
by ljxtreem
nicbeer wrote:LJ diff ratios? I guess these only fit into the 1ltr diffs.

cheers


Yep, the front is a bolt in, and the rear, because it is the same as the front on an LJ you have to use a 1ltr rear centre in the LJ third member :P


Mock

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 2:47 pm
by ljxtreem
christover1 wrote:
nicbeer wrote:LJ diff ratios? I guess these only fit into the 1ltr diffs.

cheers
that is true, another advantage of little diffs...hoping LJ diffs are strong enuff, time will tell..The 1.0 diffs have stood up well to the 1.3 donk, tho. christover


Strength, shouldnt be an issue, I hope, I mean how many LJ's out there had the 4K conversion :roll:

Anyway, U drive too eligently to be breakin shit :)


Mr Mock

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 4:09 pm
by christover1
Da Zook wrote:where abouts did u get these tyres mate???


widetread tires in Lilydale, many places say they sell mongrels, but most had no stock, these guys have loads. $155 a tyre fitted and balanced.
For those who seek Mongrels call in at WIDETREAD 32 Main St.
Lilydale or phone 9735 0188 or Fax 9735 3854 or email
peterp@a... talk to Chris Walsh or Russel Grant.

christover

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 4:19 pm
by christover1
ljxtreem wrote: Anyway, U drive too eligently to be breakin shit :)

Mr Mock


:oops: :oops: now I'll get a big head :D

tyres

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 7:18 pm
by bennybigballs
you bought retreads for 155 fitted i can get 31s centipedes fitted for 160 brand knew tyre thats if ive read you right . the 31s will probably kill the 1lt diffs i blew both c/v shafts apart within 6 months of each other and chewed 3 teeth off the pinion gear on the rear diff then the backlash got so bad i had to replace any way which caused me to flog out a rear tail shaft uni as well so i suggest you look for some early 1.3 lt diffs out of a long wheel base will bolt straight in without the brake booster

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 7:28 pm
by bigsteve
Excellent Work Chris Great to see some new shoes uder the ol' girl

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 7:38 pm
by -Mick-
they look absolutely horn Christover :twisted:

Don't worry about knockers :roll: Have fun on em ;)

Re: tyres

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 7:54 pm
by ljxtreem
bennybigballs wrote:you bought retreads for 155 fitted i can get 31s centipedes fitted for 160 brand knew tyre thats if ive read you right . the 31s will probably kill the 1lt diffs i blew both c/v shafts apart within 6 months of each other and chewed 3 teeth off the pinion gear on the rear diff then the backlash got so bad i had to replace any way which caused me to flog out a rear tail shaft uni as well so i suggest you look for some early 1.3 lt diffs out of a long wheel base will bolt straight in without the brake booster


u havnt seen chris drive :!:

I ran 36' swampers for a longtime on suzuki diffs, rearly broke stuff.
Its got more to do with the way u drive.
Chris would have more offroad experiance than 90% of the people on this forum.

Mock

Re: tyres

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 8:31 pm
by muppet_man67
bennybigballs wrote:you bought retreads for 155 fitted i can get 31s centipedes fitted for 160 brand knew tyre thats if ive read you right . the 31s will probably kill the 1lt diffs i blew both c/v shafts apart within 6 months of each other and chewed 3 teeth off the pinion gear on the rear diff then the backlash got so bad i had to replace any way which caused me to flog out a rear tail shaft uni as well so i suggest you look for some early 1.3 lt diffs out of a long wheel base will bolt straight in without the brake booster
centipedes mt's are a different kind of tyre. There isn't many tyres around as aggresive as the mongrels for that kind of money.

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 8:54 pm
by Whitey
christover1 wrote:
RB zook wrote:32's ?


nice


they are the retreads, named 31's to differentiate from the remould 32's, but they both measure 31...I couldn't see point of remoulds as they are not full remoulds anyway...retreads have softer sidewalls, tho, too. ...christover



Nice tyres!! I VERY jealous... When you talk about the full re-moulds, do you mean the mono-form tyre they talk about on the motorway website? And just wondering why you wanted softer sidewalls?? So they bag out better??

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 9:24 pm
by christover1
Whitey wrote:Nice tyres!! I VERY jealous... When you talk about the full re-moulds, do you mean the mono-form tyre they talk about on the motorway website? And just wondering why you wanted softer sidewalls?? So they bag out better??


yes, the full remould is the monoform and yes, softer does bag out better, especially on a light zook....altho I would pay the extra 30 bucks if they were moulded all the way round..because of the carcasses they using now, its only possible to do one side and the tread..so I opted for the retread...retreads are a bad choice for long, hot highway trips, but I don't do that anymore....christover...

Re: tyres

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 9:34 pm
by droopypete
muppet_man67 wrote: centipedes mt's are a different kind of tyre


They are fine for rav4's and Kia's and the like, but Chris is a bit more demanding of his tyres :)
Peter.

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 9:41 pm
by christover1
New tyres are always a better choice than 2nd hand, remoulded or retreaded tyres...no argument from me...I did consider centipede mt's but the 31's measured just under 30, odd isn't it...I chose aggressive tread, because of the terrain I enjoy, everybody makes the right choice for their own lifestyle...Nice new simexes, swampers and many such amazing rubber are all superior to a mongrel retread, of course....but with a cheaper tyre comes less stress if I kill one on a sharp rock, or if I want to park the car in a dodgy neighbourhood....I appreciate all opinions, even when they don't agree with mine, I don't know everything, and discussion is how we all benefit from this and other forums...I have been using 1.0 litre diffs with 26/28/30 and 31's for a long time, and yes I have broke 2 cv's in 7 years, both under extreme circumstances, I expect a little carnage from a 1.3 driving 1.o running gear, but its surprisingly reliable.....thanks also for those who support me in my decisions, mates and strangers....I have given this decision a few months of thought, and its the best one for me, allowing for just affordable purchase and replacement, and cost of vehicle mods to suit, and I am no way offended by negative feed back, because I value all ideas and opinions. christover.