another ultimate LR
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:33 pm
sorry i don't have any pics, i will try and sort something out. i was reading LRO April 1992 p50-51, and came across this:
so it was the engineers associated with the land rover decided to draw up a second new vehicle which rover might produce, "should the land rover not be successful in holding sales," as Tom Barton put it recently. The exact start date of this project is impossible to establish, but all evidence points to late 1952. the new vehicle was a farm tractor, although it was sufficiently different from the tractors then in production to be of considerable interest. The inspiration had probably come from two sources: firstly, from the land rover itself, which had of course been designed primarily as an agricultural vehicle, and secondly, from the discussions which senior members of the rover company had conducted in autum 1952 with Harry Ferguson, whose lightweight "grey fergie" tractor had been enormously successful in the immediate post-war years. The talks, which involved some sort of collaboration between ferguson and rover, eventually foundered; but they must have left their mark.
The new tractor was drawn up by John Cullen and Tom Barton, who were then the two most senior land rover engineers. The single prototype had a very simple rectangular frame with a land rover petrol tank at the rear, a 1595cc engine (probably P3 car engine if the air cleaner arrangements in surviving pictures are anything to go by) and four wheel drive. For manouevrability, Cullen and Barton also provided FOUR WHEEL STEERING, in order to give it maximum rough-terrain ability, they developed a system of gears IN the wheel assemblies by means of which the vehicle could be raised an extra 10 or 12 inches.
now from the one pictue in the mag it looks impressive, it must be running approx the same size tractor wheels/tyres as the forest rover, if not bigger. the first thing i noticed is the axle center line is about 5-6 inches LOWER than the center line of the wheel it self. so it looks like it has a reverse portal that must be able to turn in the wheel.
any thoughts?
cheers, serg
so it was the engineers associated with the land rover decided to draw up a second new vehicle which rover might produce, "should the land rover not be successful in holding sales," as Tom Barton put it recently. The exact start date of this project is impossible to establish, but all evidence points to late 1952. the new vehicle was a farm tractor, although it was sufficiently different from the tractors then in production to be of considerable interest. The inspiration had probably come from two sources: firstly, from the land rover itself, which had of course been designed primarily as an agricultural vehicle, and secondly, from the discussions which senior members of the rover company had conducted in autum 1952 with Harry Ferguson, whose lightweight "grey fergie" tractor had been enormously successful in the immediate post-war years. The talks, which involved some sort of collaboration between ferguson and rover, eventually foundered; but they must have left their mark.
The new tractor was drawn up by John Cullen and Tom Barton, who were then the two most senior land rover engineers. The single prototype had a very simple rectangular frame with a land rover petrol tank at the rear, a 1595cc engine (probably P3 car engine if the air cleaner arrangements in surviving pictures are anything to go by) and four wheel drive. For manouevrability, Cullen and Barton also provided FOUR WHEEL STEERING, in order to give it maximum rough-terrain ability, they developed a system of gears IN the wheel assemblies by means of which the vehicle could be raised an extra 10 or 12 inches.
now from the one pictue in the mag it looks impressive, it must be running approx the same size tractor wheels/tyres as the forest rover, if not bigger. the first thing i noticed is the axle center line is about 5-6 inches LOWER than the center line of the wheel it self. so it looks like it has a reverse portal that must be able to turn in the wheel.
any thoughts?
cheers, serg