Page 1 of 1

internal air intake

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 10:36 pm
by EricB
Hi
Saw this pick of a GQ on ebay. It looks as if the air intake goes through the firewall. Is this wise? It looks neat.

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 11:03 pm
by ozy1
they normally send em into the glove box, just dont leave stuff in there........... :D

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 11:19 pm
by toughnut
It'd be great unless you found yourself in deep water and you got stuck or had to flood your car so you could get traction without floating. :D

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 1:01 am
by paul1a
I considered rigging up an internal intake but wouldn't it be very noisy!

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 8:08 am
by bigsteve
I ran one on my zook, it was very noisy.

But seeing though I drove it on raod as well I just unbolted the pod filter & reattached it to the hose section back under the bonnet.

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 8:32 am
by J Top
It is the Pod filters that are noisy,if you run the normal air cleaner , or silencer as the yanks used to call them, the induction noise is reduced.
I set a Ford Exploder up this way with a removable hose and a plug for the hole, but the customer found the noise so little he never took the hose off and fitted the plug.
J Top

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:55 pm
by objet
I had been thining about this to get cooler air into my hilux diesel on hot days. I runs so much better with cool air.
The cab is nice and cool, espesh with a/c on, why not feed the engine with it? I thought it would be noisy and thats why noone does it, but the snorkel intake doesn't seem that loud (not that I've listened to it at 3000rpm).

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 8:25 pm
by built4thrashing
doing this is illegal and can be dangerous!!!!


by putting your air intake inside the cab it can creat a negative air pressure in the cab and suck out oxygen that you need to breath. it was ok for big steve coz it was a permanent convertable.

also if you stuc a vacumn inside the cab then engine will stall from lack of air. you'd have to drive everywhere with a window down so the thought of cold air from a/c helping will be lost.

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 8:48 pm
by mickyd555
what would be the advantage to doing this over a snorkel?? i cant see any, adn i dont reckon it would be that much cheaper in the long run, not to mention the noise everyone is talking about.......

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 9:16 pm
by J Top
Not defacing the visible parts of the vehicle.
No snorkle available for your vehicle.
No external pipework to get torn off in trees.
J Top

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 10:54 pm
by toughnut
A friend of mine used to have a mini with an SD Webber carby and the intakes used to poke inside the cab. We used to try to throw stuff down the intakes just to p!$$ him off. After He'd done some work to the car he was driving around and the car backfire through the carby and singed his hair on his arm and leg. :rofl:

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:10 pm
by christover1
toughnut wrote:A friend of mine used to have a mini with an SD Webber carby and the intakes used to poke inside the cab. We used to try to throw stuff down the intakes just to p!$$ him off. After He'd done some work to the car he was driving around and the car backfire through the carby and singed his hair on his arm and leg. :rofl:


ditto, almost, had a mate with a moke with webers in thru the dash...I wouldnt get in, cause fumes and fear of backfires was too scarey...was very noisey, almost ripped ya pants off under acceleration..christover

Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:44 am
by EricB
Thanks, they are all good points.

I was just thinking it might be a cheap alternative.

Safari want $500 fitted :?