CCDA Rollcage
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:46 pm
A little birdy told me that the Draft has been indepentantly reviewed and that it should be released in the next week.


I would hold off untill the new regs, I will if I have too.DanielS wrote:how will this effect me as Im planning on building a rollcage in the next month????![]()
plus how many cage failures have we had in 4x4 motorsport in australia ever? i'm not saying we should allow exaust pipe with 30 bends, but a solid main hoop and straight rear stays should really take the brunt of what most of us can dish out.krimnl wrote:wish they could make up there mind then stick to it. sick of having to keep changing things .
no other form of motorsport has to go through the changes we do. they all get time to make changes, and when entries are being accepted for events the rules and guidlines are set down first. not changed at the last minute.
agreed they need to do the job, but where is the weakness in the design specs they already had? (6 point, straight rear stays, crossbraced main hoop, spreader between front and main hoop). i had my cage all planned and set to go following those specs... now i'd better wait to see if it'd comply, so i'm lucky in that respect... just impatientludacris wrote:With all of the bad media about 4x4's and the speed that we are reaching in comps plus the higher centre of gravity they do need to make sure that the cages are going to do there job. It is better to save a tradgedy then learn from one like in Victoria.
LudaCris
I agree with Darren 100%. Ive had 2 ccda cages in mine now and if theres major changes i'm not stuffing around putting a third one in. Sometimes I think it would have been cheaper and easier to go Safari racing.krimnl wrote:wish they could make up there mind then stick to it. sick of having to keep changing things .
no other form of motorsport has to go through the changes we do. they all get time to make changes, and when entries are being accepted for events the rules and guidlines are set down first. not changed at the last minute.
IMHO it would be better if the responsibility was purely the owners - I mean i's his noggan at riskThe Fish wrote:This puts the responsibilty of the cage's strength/integrity back on the stat dec signatory and not on the CCDA, scrutineers or the event directors.
At a guess would that be wollongongwisey_86 wrote:hi guys im looking for info on eco cages for comps would u know where i could get any info
Cheers damien
p.s i live in australia