Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

ultimate wheelbase?

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply
Posts: 1836
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:41 am
Location: Brisbane

ultimate wheelbase?

Post by badger »

whats the ultimate wheel base
no f#@k wits need reply
i wish to kno the pros and cons of different wheelbases
and the peoples oppinion of ideal
Last edited by badger on Thu Mar 23, 2006 6:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Posts: 337
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 10:16 pm
Location: Gympie

Post by small talk »

will depend on tyre size etc your running on your truck.
Last edited by small talk on Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1984 Hilux dualcab.
Posts: 16934
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:57 pm

Post by RUFF »

The next smart ass reply will be banned for life!

The guy has asked a simple question if you cant answer it then Shut the Fark up :roll:
Posts: 7230
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 10:42 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by MissDrew »

My buggy will have a 105 wheel base, why? I think its a good compromise between break over angle and stability. I never had anything this short before and have basicly only decided this as it is in the middle of a shorties wheel base (which is too short) and my hilux (which is too long) :roll:
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:44 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by jakam04 »

Ive got a FJ73 MWB cruiser, would like to think ive got the best of both worlds. Short wheel base seem to be like a jack rabbit lol where as the long wheel seems to wallow.

My opinion (hopefully appears to be a valid one as dont wanna be banned lol)

Jarrod :)
2008 Nissan Patrol Wagon ST 3.0TD
1994 LN106 Singlecab 2.8
Posts: 8459
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 8:15 pm
Location: Townsville

Post by "CANADA" »

need to know more 'specs' about the rest of the truck...will depend on everything from tire size to weight and more importantly what it would be driving on...
[quote="dazza30875"]whats "FAIL" mean[/quote]

[quote="fool_injected"]

Sometimes your funny Canada :D[/quote]
Posts: 1836
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:41 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by badger »

bundera with extra cab chop (to be done at same time)
and 35's
i like to drive most terains but dont like how shortys stand up
nor do i like how wagons bottom out
guess im looking 4 an idea on whats the happy meduim
God of Athiests
Posts: 8337
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 2:14 am
Location: Brownsville

Post by DamTriton »

Whichever amount you choose, it is always a compromise. There really is no "ideal" wheelbase. "Midwheelbase" will have a combination of the best and worst of both short and long wheelbases. 105-115" seems too be acknowledged as a reasonable midwheelbase length and the best compromise. (SWB zook 88", GQ Patrol ~122" - correct me if I'm wrong)
George Carlin, an American Comedian said; "Think of how stupid the average person is, and realise that half of them are stupider than that".
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:57 pm
Location: geelong

Post by GQ4.8coilcab »

a few mates who have the mwb conversion (102inch)on their GQ's wreckon they are just about right for comp work as they lose that edge of wanting to wheel stand on steep climbs but arnt too long to bottom out. For what you do, maybe a 100 inch or slightly more wheelbase will suffice with the size of your tyres.

Just my 2c,
Julian
[color=red][size=150][b]CTRL + W[/b][/size][/color]
Posts: 4275
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by ozy1 »

i have a GQ SWB, which is in the middle of a ute chop, then ill be onto wheel base extension, factory it sits at 94" and im hoping to get out to 104-110, might get to about 106 i think at this stage,
Posts: 1397
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: West Australia Posts: Less than DeWsE

Post by jeep97tj »

Short wheel base 90-100 is good for tight tracks and uneven ground (less chance of bellying out) and max 38" tyres, 110+ is good for 44+ tyres and steep climbs, 100-110 is best for average Joe that wants the best of both worlds, steep climbs and tight tracks.

That’s my view on the world of wheel base, but this Q is a bit like " Whats better manual or auto", or "Whats the best tyre" U are going to get so many different opinions.
Shane
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Post by Beastmavster »

Have a SWB GQ which I believe is something like 98". It's too short for some of the more scary climbs (I've backout out of a couple from fear factor and lack of front locker).

But the roughly ~130" stuff like LWB Defenders and GU's can struggle in the tight stuff, and it can also be pretty hard keeping both ends on a ridge on a twisty trail in a LWB.

In the end you would build for the type of work you want to do.

I'd love maybe another 6" of wheelbase though. I think about 105-110" would be ideal for the sort of stuff I do.
Posts: 1767
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Just Near Fraser Island

Post by Maggot4x4 »

I've found 100" to be a perfect combo with 35's, esp if you can keep the truck low.

It rarely feels like it wants to go over backwards, but it also dosen't bottom out very often.
[quote="Wooders"]If ya want a 4x4 camry go ahead & buy a Patrol or Cruiser.[/quote]Rangie with 80s LC diffs, Isuzu 4bd1, Twin ARB lockers, 8000lb Hi mount warn, 315x75x16 Procomp XTerrains
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 9:43 am
Location: lost in my pile of parts

Post by Tim D »

My brothers have rovers, 100inch and "the 109" , i had a 109 leafer, hated it, with coils power steer and 35's the 109 is awsome up hills, the 100 inch lifts a little up hills, but still not enough to worry u.
My ideal wheel base would be 107 like an early series 1 landrover lwb ;)

my 2 cents
Posts: 571
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 3:56 pm
Location: New York

Re: ultimate wheelbase?

Post by zzzz »

badger wrote:whats the ultimate wheel base
no f#@k wits need reply
i wish to kno the pros and cons of different wheelbases
and the peoples oppinion of ideal
105" :finger:
Posts: 4065
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 8:31 am
Location: ACT

Post by Wendle »

depends on a lot of other factors, but i think:

105" for competitive rock crawling.
110" for straight out driving big stuff.
Posts: 1144
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Quirindi, NSW

Post by bushy555 »

I reckon the ultimate wheel base is one that you can change on the go...

...as in a winch on the rear diff, pulling the front diff backwards, whilst you gain a bit of height. Got it all sorted out on me tube buggy plans.

Or shove some hydraulic rams as rear trailing arms to pull/push the rear diff. Simple.
Bushies: http://www.angelfire.com/on4/bushy5560/ http://www.angelfire.com/on4/bushy5561/
Lightforce HID conversion stuff: http://www.angelfire.com/on4/bushy5551/
Posts: 3614
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2002 9:02 am
Location: Gold Coast

Post by 83 lux »

i think the best WB for me is 117''
:armsup:
HOOLAY Wish i could buy boggers for my DH bike
Posts: 4990
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 7:22 pm
Location: Qld, Hilux Country

Post by bubs »

110" :armsup:
http://www.budscustoms.com.au
Like us and follow on facebook for up to date information of what we are working on and great random specials!

Custom Parts & Fabrication!
Ph: 0417 708 598
Posts: 1837
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2002 10:49 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by beebee »

83 lux wrote:i think the best WB for me is 117''
:armsup:
I see your 117" and raise you to 118 1/2" :shock:
TEAM DGR WEBSITE
TEAM DGR ON FACEBOOK

Sponsors:
SUPERIOR ENGINEERING
LOCKTUP 4X4
UNIVERSAL DRIVESHAFTS QUEENSLAND
MASSOJET UNDER BODY BUDDY
DIRTCOMP
4WD TV
Posts: 10984
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 3:47 pm
Location: Bum drilling with my buddy Ray!

Post by GRIMACE »

100" 35" tyres
105" 38" tyres
110" 42" tyres

:D
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

100.5 for a buggy
104 for trail rig :D
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Posts: 2066
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 8:17 pm
Location: Gympie

Post by Rhett »

95" gotta luv em short
Its a wheelbase thing
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

I've been thinking about this (because it beats thinking about more important issues :D ) and I'm wondering if there's a few basic guidelines?

For instance, ramp-over angle is probably important, which is affected by clearance under the belly/chassis rails (rather than diff clearance) and also relates to tyre size.

Short wheelbase, small tyres could have same ramp-over as longer wheelbase and larger tyres, but would have smaller clearance. :?

That's OK - 'coz I'll just lift my shorty to the same clearance, and I'll have BETTER ramp-over. :armsup:

But then it may be too pitchy/unstable? :cry:

Hang on. Instead of lifting the suspension, I'll chop the guards and whack in some MASSIVE tyres! :armsup: I've now got the big clearance, got an EXCELLENT ramp-over angle :armsup: and I DON'T have the huge suspension lift! But it's still almost as tall as it is long, and looks like a full-scale promotion for next season's hot new kiddy toy. :bad-words:

So I'm guessing PROPORTION is an important word here - but what works and what doesn't? :?

For the record, I've got 33" tyres on a wheelbase which is supposedly 95" - and I think it would be too short for competition work. For touring it's a little pitchy, but for the tracks to which I limit myself (such as the medium/hard tracks around LCMP) it's a pretty good package.

Cheers,

Scott
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests