Page 1 of 2
Sydney's sweetest zook?
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 4:00 pm
by STUMPY
Saw this one today.
36"swampers
3 link front
A frame rear
Sweetest barwork
Not sure i he's a wheeler or a bling king.
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 4:01 pm
by STUMPY
more
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 4:15 pm
by STUMPY
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 4:20 pm
by Vineboy
Wow!
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 4:58 pm
by jeep97tj
Thoses fenders look Grimace, but i spose if u want to drive it on the road u need them, would of been better if u could remove them though.
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 5:18 pm
by Squik
Hmmm....no sill bars....and no damage......either lucky, good driver, newly done...........or BLING!
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 5:21 pm
by redzook
Squik wrote:Hmmm....no sill bars....and no damage......either lucky, good driver, newly done...........or BLING!
looked at that myself but i think there is a bit of angle or somthing welded there?
but still there is no paint taken off it
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 5:24 pm
by CHOPZUKI
doesnt do much for me sorry
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 6:13 pm
by SAWZALL
CHOPZUKI wrote:doesnt do much for me sorry
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 6:16 pm
by Spike_Sierra
ditto,
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 6:22 pm
by jo_shnz
4 words city slicker show pony
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 6:40 pm
by RUFF
Built by Matt Dunk about 4 years ago for Dave from Humbug car sales. Dont think Dave ever realy used it and then it was sold off. I hadnt heard anything about it since.
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 6:42 pm
by ZOOK60
this thing has been round for years from memory it runs rangie running gear i remember seing it in the trading post for sale about 5 years ago
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 7:36 pm
by Bentzook
its one ugly mother fcuker
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 7:45 pm
by jo_shnz
yes it is rather ugly,why would u spend so much $$$$ on it?and it ended up looking fugly anyway
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 8:22 pm
by markil
It's had about 3 or 4 owners in the last few years too. The last owner was asking $8k for it I think. When it was for sale the 1st time I saw it (probly 4-5 yrs ago now) owner was asking $23K for it initialy and I'm pretty sure soon dropped it to $17k. Seems like it is just a ugly show pony these days.
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 8:26 pm
by HotAe92
But coilies are shit?
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 8:30 pm
by cutzook
yeah its not floating my boat either... looks
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 8:53 pm
by lay80n
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 10:09 pm
by beally
i saw it for sale in the 4x4 trader about a year ago.
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 11:09 pm
by CHOPS1
ugly? seems to look like most highly modified zook on here!
Chop
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 11:36 pm
by "CANADA"
CHOPS1 wrote:ugly? seems to look like most highly modified zook on here!
Chop
or not!
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 11:58 pm
by CHOPS1
MADZUKI wrote:CHOPS1 wrote:ugly? seems to look like most highly modified zook on here!
Chop
or not!
Yep your right, its not chopped and has nearly all its panels!
and not nearly enough bar work.
Chop
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 12:05 am
by munecito
I don't really like its look too. Nice, but.....
Will
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 12:33 am
by mach.25
I like it. Doesn't look like it does much much off roading.
Shame to waste a Zook on the road.
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:29 am
by grimbo
HotAe92 wrote:But coilies are shit?
Its not a coily but rather a car converted to coil sprung which is very different as the design flaws of the coily will have been fixed with a custom suspension design
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 12:07 pm
by -ZukChiK-
Looks like it stole Dame Edna's glasses... Somebody part this ugly MOFO!
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 2:16 pm
by waxhead..
Unless I am mistaken it was posted up here as 'suzuki monster truck' or something similar earlier this year, there was a photo posted of it in a car yard, I thought they were asking 14 or 16k for it.
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 5:04 pm
by ofr57
the person that built that should be ashamed
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 6:00 pm
by zookiemad
its not all that bad
but if your not going to take it off road what the point in spending that much cash
jess
