Page 1 of 1

rear triangle and trailing arms

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:38 pm
by ranover
has anyone got these or tried to make something similiar for their rangie i think it looks like a sick setup really like the a arm mod and would the arms be better then cranked ones http://www.equipe4x4.com/inglese/ARTICO ... MS&NFOTO=2

http://www.equipe4x4.com/inglese/ARTICO ... 20TRIANGLE

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:54 pm
by ISUZUROVER
Bear in mind that heim/rose joints are illegal on-road in OZ AFAIK.

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:59 pm
by Rangie ute on 38''
can and will buy a pair of them :twisted:

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:55 pm
by ranover
who will know anyway they would be for a purpose biult rig. but they do look sweet

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:08 pm
by uninformed
i'm pretty sure that all there products are bolt on for coil sprung rovers.

these guys were the originals that scrapion racing copied

there quality is reputed to be very high, just make sure you buy equippe not scorpion.

apart from the unretained springs, everything looks shit hot. for a daily driver(but make sure retained) they may be easy to get engineered and could be returned to stock easily

cheers, serg

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:38 pm
by ISUZUROVER
ranover wrote:who will know anyway they would be for a purpose biult rig. but they do look sweet
If it is for a purpose-built (offroad) rig then you can do a lot better than use the standard chassis mount positions.

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 9:10 pm
by ranover
uninformed wrote:i'm pretty sure that all there products are bolt on for coil sprung rovers.

these guys were the originals that scrapion racing copied

there quality is reputed to be very high, just make sure you buy equippe not scorpion.

apart from the unretained springs, everything looks shit hot. for a daily driver(but make sure retained) they may be easy to get engineered and could be returned to stock easily

cheers, serg
i thought i saw them somewhere else (the design) and i would definaitly keep the springs retained

IZUZUROVER i know they might be illegal on road and i could make a better setup for offroad rig and would, but was just checkin them out cause we dont have a great deal of stuff over here that is a bolt on type of product such as these and would love to distribute or have a shop one day that deals in this sort of stuff (ok im dreamin again)

Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 2:50 pm
by Jack Flash
They look too pretty to be any good !! Get some steam pipe that fits neatly over the whole trailing arm,take one end off and slide it on, cut to length and weld the steam pipe to each of the rounded bush ends so nothing of the original trailing arm can be seen. You will have to replace the rubber bushes as these will get a little burnt in the weld !! You now have a super strong trailing arm that I have tried to bend .... but cant !!!

Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:13 pm
by ranover
got any pics of them sound good

Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 6:28 pm
by 460cixy
steam pipe is the way to go for parts like that its strong stuff

Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 6:39 pm
by Michele
Uniballs (rose joints?) seem not to last long...

May I ask why to focus on the rear axle while the front is usually more restricted?
Same old question I know...


BTW E*uipe hq is 30 mins far from me...

Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 10:18 am
by ranover
they where just the pics i have seen so i posted them is all. no real focus front would be what you said more restricted of course.

have you priced there stuff i guess you would have if so how much would some of there stuff cost you

Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 2:32 pm
by red90
I guess the answer is there is really no point. The stock setup is fine for tons of travel. You should put in stronger trailing arms though as they are known to fold up on occasion.

Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 2:57 pm
by walker
Yes, I have wondered about some of these mods that give extra movement. I admit they look fantastic but not sure if they are worth the money.

the problem I can see is that even with stock rear suspension components, 2.5" spring lift, 2.5" body lift and a 2 door with guards cut to the max, it is the wheel well that is limiting my movement, not the suspension.

Image

rose

Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 5:25 pm
by def90
hey ben i thought heim joints were 2? but zippy gets his disco's engineered with them on the top mount of his big boy bilsteins, instead on eyes, on the back end of his rovers? unless he knows the 'right engineer'?

Re: rose

Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 6:42 pm
by ISUZUROVER
def90 wrote:hey ben i thought heim joints were 2? but zippy gets his disco's engineered with them on the top mount of his big boy bilsteins, instead on eyes, on the back end of his rovers? unless he knows the 'right engineer'?
Hi Sam,

Now that you mention it, I have seen some trucks that were supposedly approved, and had a heim at one end and a rubber bush at the other - so it may be possible that way. But funnily enough, zippy was the first person I heard say that rose joints were illegal - about 6 years ago. How is he doing anyway???

Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:30 pm
by ranover
doesnt the smith family run them on their rangie the blue one they are rose joints

heim

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 7:54 am
by def90
benny he's going well, went for a wheel with him on the weekend to the springs, near warwick. his moved out near ipswich somewhere and has his custom shop out there, doing disco ute conversions (alex from the L/R club bought one) and fab work. he's going to ute a P38 soon :armsup: