Page 1 of 2

15x8 vs. 15x10

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2003 10:16 pm
by MQ080
For a 35/12.5 what do people think is the best way to go.... no "theories" - i could make these up myself. I'm sure there are people out there that have tried both... your thoughts please.

I know there are a lot of other factors want a bit of an idea

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2003 10:21 pm
by Kev80
I have tried both & like my 10" rims.

I think if you intend to to drop your tyre pressure down low the 8" rim could be beter if not bead locked.
The tyres fill out beter on the 10" rims and make them look fatter. :cool:
Also think the tread is flatter so it wears evenly.

Only illegal in QLD though ! :bad-words:

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2003 10:36 pm
by MUSS
Kev80 wrote:I have tried both & like my 10" rims.

I think if you intend to to drop your tyre pressure down low the 8" rim could be beter if not bead locked.
The tyres fill out beter on the 10" rims and make them look fatter. :cool:
Also think the tread is flatter so it wears evenly.

Only illegal in QLD though ! :bad-words:


:shock: bugger me... why they only legal in qld????? i think im gonna have to go 16x10s when i go procomp X terrains (315x75x16r) hmmmm do they even make 16x10 rims?????

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2003 10:39 pm
by MQ080
16x10's do exist

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2003 10:45 pm
by Kev80
JAKE wrote::shock: bugger me... why they only legal in qld?????


illegal = not legal in QLD :finger:



JAKE wrote: do they even make 16x10 rims?????


Yup, i have 10x16 rims running 315/75/16 muds.

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2003 10:48 pm
by MUSS
awwe teh he teh he i can read :roll: :rofl: what make are they kev... MANGELS??? what price did you get em for?

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2003 10:54 pm
by Kev80
Mickey Thompson classic 2 (alloy) imported from OS through USA 4x4.:cool:

Nice rims but not cheap, couple hundred $$$ each.

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2003 11:04 pm
by MQ080
Yeah the only 16x10's i can think of are through the states, casue that seems to be the norm over there

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 12:38 pm
by auto_eng
Are you sure they are illegal in Qld?

I thought the rule for width was largest manufactures option plus 30% for the tyre and the rim just had to be suitable for that tyre?

Could be wrong. They used to have max rim widths but they got dropped.

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 1:34 pm
by bogged
also illegal in Vic, and NSW from whats been talked about 298472984792834792374928347 times before.

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 2:32 pm
by Wendle
bogged wrote:also illegal in Vic, and NSW from whats been talked about 298472984792834792374928347 times before.


the dude that posted above you is an engineering signatory, and he is right, the rules are a changing.

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 2:47 pm
by Kev80
Wendle wrote:the dude that posted above you is an engineering signatory, and he is right, the rules are a changing.


Good point, just because something has been discused before doesn't mean nothing has changed.

Auto_eng, Are things changing ?
I heard they may bring all states inline with each other, if so would we be beter off or worse ?

BTW- like ya email address ! :twisted:

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 3:33 pm
by bogged
Wendle wrote: the rules are a changing.


Are doesnt mean have...

Is that part of the ADR rules going national (which I thought they were, but are different from state to state? eg QLD is tight as a nuns nasty on what you can and cant do.... ) cause thats been happening since jesus played in the centers for Jerusalem under 10D's...

Personally I dont see what the problem with wider rims is from the authorities side, I cant see a dangerous side of the argument... anyone got an idea? Or is it just being anal?

16x10 mickey thompson classic 2

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 3:44 pm
by robbie54
IVE GOT 30 OF THESE IN STOCK AT THE MOMENT.THEY RETAIL AT $376.00 EACH BUT FOR MEMBERS OF THIS SITE I TAKE OFF 5%

CHEERS
ROBBIE

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 4:01 pm
by Kev80
bogged wrote:Personally I dont see what the problem with wider rims is from the authorities side, I cant see a dangerous side of the argument... anyone got an idea? Or is it just being anal?


Could it be the bead is not seated as well ?
Or does it change the offset ? (just a guessing)

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 4:19 pm
by MUSS
the reason why wider tyers are illegal in other states is purely because the tyres will sit proud of the guards no matter what off set... and if a vehicle runs one of these while both vehicles are movin it can an wil project the car sky ward..... air borne....weeeeeeee....... :shock: ......LOOK AT ME MUMMY :finger:

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 4:33 pm
by Wendle
increased track width and increased leverage on steering and suspension bits.

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 4:43 pm
by MUSS
Wendle wrote:increased track width and increased leverage on steering and suspension bits.


but thats not why you cant legally road them... been told that its purely a safety issue

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 4:46 pm
by MQ080
Robbie54 what type of rims are you talking about? 15x10 steels? I'll do a set with -44 offset for $175ea Outerlimits member or non :cool:

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 4:58 pm
by Kev80
MQ080 wrote:Robbie54 what type of rims are you talking about? 15x10 steels? I'll do a set with -44 offset for $175ea Outerlimits member or non :cool:


I think he's talking about the 16x10 Mickey Thompson classic 2 (alloy)

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 4:59 pm
by MQ080
Oh well, i'll under cut him with them too :D

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 7:44 pm
by CRUSHU
the problem with extra load on steering and axle components is the safety issue when your axle breaks as you do 100kph on the onramp to the bolte bridge, or any other high speed situation, when your car or truck unexpectantly becomes a trike!

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2003 8:10 am
by auto_eng
I'm not sure that there is one particular reason why limits are set for alternative rims and tyres but both above make sense.

The ADR's (Australian Design Rules) are the rules that must be met when a vehicle is first manufactured. This certification is done at a Federal Level. Once a vehicle is registered and used on the road it becomes a state level and the states get to make up their own rules/guidelines. Just because your modification meets the ADR does not mean it will meet the state guidelines

There is good and bad to different schemes. Each vehicle when certifed for the first time has to meet the relevant ADR for braking systems. Fitting larger diameter tyres decreases the effectiveness of the brake system so I think that is why they set limits.

There are certification schemes available at a Federal Level for new vehicles. If you were really keen you could take a new Criuser Ute (just and example) and put the biggest set of tyres on it you could find that were still an aproved combination and gain approval (called a second stage of manufacture) but you would have to prove the vehicle still meets the ADR's affected - brakes, ligh layout, rims size, rim selection, turning circle . This would mean a full brake test amongst other things. This test includes a lane change manouver fully laden.

Basically if you want to take full advantage for the ADR limits as opposed to the state limits you need to be ready to shell out the cash and get the approvals. Not cheap!

If you don't want to blow all your cash on approvals then you have to stick within the limits set by the states.

Can I take a minute to mention my posts are provided for infomation only. Please don't think if I say something is not legal or approvalbe that I am saying you should change it or should not have done it. I'm not the police - some people just want to know where they stand.

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2003 8:12 am
by Wendle
JAKE wrote:
Wendle wrote:increased track width and increased leverage on steering and suspension bits.


but thats not why you cant legally road them...


Yes it is. More than 25mm increased track width gets the authorites "UP IN ARMS" :D

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2003 8:45 am
by MQ080
auto_eng wrote:There are certification schemes available at a Federal Level for new vehicles. If you were really keen you could take a new Criuser Ute (just and example) and put the biggest set of tyres on it you could find that were still an aproved combination and gain approval (called a second stage of manufacture) but you would have to prove the vehicle still meets the ADR's affected - brakes, ligh layout, rims size, rim selection, turning circle . This would mean a full brake test amongst other things. This test includes a lane change manouver fully laden.

Can I take a minute to mention my posts are provided for infomation only. Please don't think if I say something is not legal or approvalbe that I am saying you should change it or should not have done it. I'm not the police - some people just want to know where they stand.


Auto are you telling me it's advice only, I just bought a new cruiser ute like you said... can you also give advice how to pay it off? :D :D :D

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2003 6:56 pm
by MUSS
Wendle wrote:
JAKE wrote:
Wendle wrote:increased track width and increased leverage on steering and suspension bits.


but thats not why you cant legally road them...


Yes it is. More than 25mm increased track width gets the authorites "UP IN ARMS" :D


ILL GIVE YA THAT ONE WENDLE... ARMS UP TO THE LOT OF YA :finger: :D

rims

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2003 11:18 am
by robbie54
yeah I WAS TALKING ABOUT 16X10 M/T CLASSIC 2

Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2003 2:04 am
by WOLF
Even if you decided to run 10" rims and you were worried about the wheel sticking out of your guard you do have a few RIM OFFSET options,maybe not so much here in OZ but over in the states you can get ANYTHING.
I think it adds some extra stability to a lifted fourbe too. :roll:

Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2003 2:48 pm
by MQ080
Who increases their height without increasing track.... that makes t r u c k s verrrryyy ssllleeeppppy

Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2003 3:40 pm
by MUSS
MQ080 wrote:Who increases their height without increasing track.... that makes t r u c k s verrrryyy ssllleeeppppy


WTF.....vry sleepy????? :roll: ???????? :? ????????