Page 1 of 1
ANYONE CHOPPED A SWB GQ INTO A UTE? PICS NEEDED
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:10 pm
by frigga 40
as post says just after some ideas
thanks
jake
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:25 pm
by frigga 40
come on someone must have some pictures of swb gq's chopped into utes
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 11:08 pm
by Artificial_Aspiration
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:20 am
by doddzee
I shifted the C piller up on mine.

Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 5:27 pm
by ozy1
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 5:55 pm
by Rampage
is there burried treasure in your back yard, (X marks the spot right!?

)
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:47 pm
by morkz
you can chop like everyone else has but if you tub the rear of the shorty i.e. keep the base of it and just remove the roof you will have better wait distribution and it will handle better at speed.
Best person to speak to would be sandy from aus4wdracing
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:57 pm
by Rhysta
morkz wrote:you can chop like everyone else has but if you tub the rear of the shorty i.e. keep the base of it and just remove the roof you will have better wait distribution and it will handle better at speed.
Best person to speak to would be sandy from aus4wdracing
Yeah but you dont acheive anything from chopping it to a style side tub, may aswell leave it as a wagon.
If your running a tray as soon as you get past the cab you can turn

and there is less crap to run tyres etc on.
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:24 pm
by morkz
Rhysta wrote:
Yeah but you dont acheive anything from chopping it to a style side tub, may aswell leave it as a wagon.
If your running a tray as soon as you get past the cab you can turn

and there is less crap to run tyres etc on.
what didnt you understand about what i said, you achieve alot by leaving it a style side cab.
most shorty that have had the arse end compeletly cut off dont handle nearly as well as the style side tub
you look at all the top competitors what do they do i have been in both and i would rather have a style side even sandy doesnt chop his wagon into a flat tray for the exact reason.
yes on a tray you can hit stuff but thats the trade off its comp truck doesnt matter if you hit the back of it anyway.
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:59 pm
by frigga 40
all i want to know is what they make the rear window out of or can you buy them. but keep thoes pics coming guys looking good
jake
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:36 pm
by ludacris
If you do not want the style side just make the tray heavier for weight distribution. We easily carried the rear of my wagon " two people" so getting the tray to weigh the same won't take much.
Talk to a window supplier and fitter and find out the prices of glass and what will make his job easier.
For my truck "wagon" I used the back of a MQ patrol. Just matted and welded.
LudaCris
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 5:07 pm
by stumpyGQ
do a search on patrol4x4.com you should find mine... shorty tub
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:40 am
by nzdarin
I cut mine to trayback and extended the wheel base to 104". At the same time the batteries and the winch are now mounted under the deck. In my opinion SWB handle bad reguardless of wieght distrubution. The extra control and therefore I get with the extra length and reduced weight is hard to descibe but it is a lot. My truck weighs 2160kgs and now I'm going to lighten it! The biggest thing I think people get wrong with GQ's is they spend huge amounts of time reducing wieght at the rear when that isn't the problem. It is the front that needs a diet! Getting rid of battereis and winch did wonderful thing to the front end.[/img]
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:43 am
by nzdarin
I should add that I also shift the 'C' pillar up the same as Doddzee's above photo. I have used polycarb (1mm thick) for the back window and fixed it in with rivets.