Aerial's ain't aerials...Or are they?
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:55 pm
I need a new aerial. A tree *may* have claimed a chunk of my aerial .
I'm confooosed and don't know which one to get!
(Had a search but couldn't find a lot of relevant info. Sorry if it's been covered)
1. None of the fibreglass ones say what material the core is made from. In theory there's a hierarchy of effective materials (starting with gold etc..). In reality does it make a noticeable difference?
2. My understanding of Gain is this... Aerials aren't powered independantly so cannot 'add' energy to the signal. Any antenna connected to the same radio will receive and transmit the same energy. The higher the gain, the more concentrated the transmission will be in one direction. The compromise is a lack of signal in another direction. Is this correct?
The first aerial on the site below is 6.5dB but still seems to have a fairly broad transmission pattern. Is there any reason not to get a 6.5dB aerial?
3. 470mHz is about a 640mm wavelength. What sort of fraction of a wavelength is the most effective aerial length?
I'm lead to believe that shorter aerials (1/4 wavelength) are more effective in places with more 'stuff' such as trees, buildings, etc.. Longer aerials (3xwavelength etc) are better in open areas (deserts).
I use my radio everywhere. I guess mostly highway cruising in a convoy, in forests, on beaches. Is there a good compromise?
Is there anything else I should consider? It's for a GME TX4000 radio and will be mounted on the side of my bonnet (the gap between the bonnet and the quarter panel).
The ones I'm considering are on the site below. The 1st, 2nd and 6th packages.
http://www.prestigecom.net.au/default.a ... openmenu=3
I'm confooosed and don't know which one to get!
(Had a search but couldn't find a lot of relevant info. Sorry if it's been covered)
1. None of the fibreglass ones say what material the core is made from. In theory there's a hierarchy of effective materials (starting with gold etc..). In reality does it make a noticeable difference?
2. My understanding of Gain is this... Aerials aren't powered independantly so cannot 'add' energy to the signal. Any antenna connected to the same radio will receive and transmit the same energy. The higher the gain, the more concentrated the transmission will be in one direction. The compromise is a lack of signal in another direction. Is this correct?
The first aerial on the site below is 6.5dB but still seems to have a fairly broad transmission pattern. Is there any reason not to get a 6.5dB aerial?
3. 470mHz is about a 640mm wavelength. What sort of fraction of a wavelength is the most effective aerial length?
I'm lead to believe that shorter aerials (1/4 wavelength) are more effective in places with more 'stuff' such as trees, buildings, etc.. Longer aerials (3xwavelength etc) are better in open areas (deserts).
I use my radio everywhere. I guess mostly highway cruising in a convoy, in forests, on beaches. Is there a good compromise?
Is there anything else I should consider? It's for a GME TX4000 radio and will be mounted on the side of my bonnet (the gap between the bonnet and the quarter panel).
The ones I'm considering are on the site below. The 1st, 2nd and 6th packages.
http://www.prestigecom.net.au/default.a ... openmenu=3