I'm living quite far of you on the other side of our planet
, in russia actually But we have same toyota's here. Same hiluxes, 40's, 60's, "heavy" 70's (rare), "light" 70's (we never call it bundera btw ), 80's (a lot) and 100's and 105's.We use some of ur experience in offroad car building but I never saw any links to a stock bundy with 3L engine, only 2LT.
Do anybody know any reason for such a difference in the engines?
For example in stock my TLC was: LJ72, short, 1993, 3L 2.8litre non-turbo diesel, 4.88 diffs, 4spd manual, 2 batteries, some additions for cold areas like 2 heaters and fuel heater etc.
I lifted it up with 80's coils and 105's shocks, put 35" Simex ET2, bullbars, sidesteps and bla bla bla...
But 3L is weak for such a tyres, so we put on it the supercharger out from 1J-JZE 2.0litre Toyota petrol engine and tuned fuel pump a bit.
Now it drives nearly the same as before on 31". Maximum speed on 35" (Simex ET2) now is about 120km/h (on speedometer actually ~100
). Dont know actually if it have now more power then 2lt engine but on low rpm I have MUCH more power then the same car with 2lt and even may be more then such a car with 1kz-te. but only on low rpm.Do anybody have an expirience of a supercharger on that diesel? Or everybody put there turbos out from 2lt of aftermarket? What is better? We have here wery few information about such a stuff.
Thanks.