Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

235/85r16 instead of 31s?

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Post Reply
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Greenbank

235/85r16 instead of 31s?

Post by zookimal »

I'm about to do new rims and rubber under my Sierra project and I'm considering going to a 235/85r16 instead of 31x10.5x15s.

I realise the price difference makes a lot of people go 15s but I like the idea of the taller, narrower 32 inch tyre.

My question is will the 16 be too stiff in the sidewall to work under the zook? MT/R for example? No beadlocks at double figure pressures etc. On road and in the bush.

Until recently I hadn't considered the 16 but I think I prefer it unless anyone has any obvious issues.

Cheers,
-Mal

Zook 1, 2, 3 gone
Patrol - Wheels, engine and stuff
Posts: 3940
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld

15s or 16s ?

Post by want33s »

:D
Last edited by want33s on Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Posts: 3940
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld

15s or 16s ?

Post by want33s »

:D
Last edited by want33s on Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Posts: 1049
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 9:48 am
Location: Waikerie; SA

Post by Eddy »

Most 235/85 16s are 8 ply rating or more, so they are going to be fairly stiff on a zook, but they will be stronger than the average 31/15 for that reason.

I've only ever had them on patrols and my 8 tonne truck. They certainly did the job in 8 ply rating on my old 1700kg G60, and the Leyland truck with it's 10 ply rating set was ok too.

Gunna be a case of "suck it and see" I guess.
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Greenbank

Post by zookimal »

I thought as much.

Any words of advice from those older, wiser ones who've spoken of 7.50s or tall, narrow tyres in the past? :D

Gwagensteve? Grimbo?

Any advice appreciated.

Cheers,
-Mal

Zook 1, 2, 3 gone
Patrol - Wheels, engine and stuff
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Greenbank

Post by zookimal »

This is the desired result, courtesy of another site. Translation anyone?

Image

235/85R16 Zook
-Mal

Zook 1, 2, 3 gone
Patrol - Wheels, engine and stuff
Posts: 1049
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 9:48 am
Location: Waikerie; SA

Post by Eddy »

askmwc wrote: Any words of advice from those older, wiser ones who've spoken of 7.50s or tall, narrow tyres in the past?
When I first started in fourbies we had a wide selection of tyres.
There were an assortment of 750s etc (including tractor type) , or 31s. (Goodyear wranglers or BFG all terrain T/A)

For a while we all jumped on the 31" bandwagon, and then went back to the 750s

Some of us went to the 825s and 900s as well
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Greenbank

Post by zookimal »

Thanks Eddy.

Not sure which way I'll go then. :?
-Mal

Zook 1, 2, 3 gone
Patrol - Wheels, engine and stuff
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Greenbank

Post by zookimal »

Bump :armsup:

Thinking just 31s on 15s
-Mal

Zook 1, 2, 3 gone
Patrol - Wheels, engine and stuff
User avatar
cj
Posts: 1913
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by cj »

I like the 235/85R16 idea myself. That's what's going on my Vit next. I've tried 31x10.50's and 7.50-16's as well as some old 33x9.50's and I reckon the 235/85R16's will be the ideal compromise at this point for me. Also mugginsmoo on here has gone that way on his Jimny......50mm of suspension lift and some cutting :D :cool: I've seen the same on a Vit and a GV too now with just suspension and cutting and it looks good without screaming look at me! That and I'd rather have the extra ground clearance.
[quote="4WD Stuff"]
I haven't quoted Grimbo because nobody takes him seriously :finger: :finger: :finger: :finger: [/quote]
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by grimbo »

I'd go the tall narrow route as I have in the past. I just reckon they work better on a Sierra (and for that matter on my patrol's too 33 x 10.50 instead of 33 x 12.50)

The tall skinny puts less strain on components, is easier to fit and in conditions found in Victoria seem to work better than the wider tyre.
Ransom note = demand + collage
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests