Page 1 of 1
DiD with bigger exhaust???? Its done!
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:32 pm
by crankycruiser
ok ive got my triton booked in for friday to get a 3" mandrel bent exhaust..
just wondering whos got a DiD with a bigger zorst and wat sorta difference it made???
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 6:25 pm
by pickle
Don't know of anyone who has modded their exhaust on the DID Paj, but it looks like you will be first to do one on the Triton.
Let us know how it goes.
Dave
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 3:57 pm
by crankycruiser
Well i got my exhaust on firday.. and it has made a difernce to the power.. not heaps but it does pull better from lower revs...
also found out that these new TD's run a cat convertor
so even with jsut one very small straight thru muffler on it, it makes no noise at all
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:11 pm
by NLShorty
My shorty NL paj has a 3.2 Did in it with a 2.5 inch mandrel bent system and hi flow muffler, not sure if its makes a difference as i had to mod the exhaust as part of the conversion.
Anyone know if the cat is a requirement on diesels these days?
Cheers, ben
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:11 pm
by crankycruiser
NLShorty wrote:My shorty NL paj has a 3.2 Did in it with a 2.5 inch mandrel bent system and hi flow muffler, not sure if its makes a difference as i had to mod the exhaust as part of the conversion.
Anyone know if the cat is a requirement on diesels these days?
Cheers, ben
im not too sure.. but i think it is..
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:45 pm
by rocknferoza
crankycruiser wrote:Well i got my exhaust on firday.. and it has made a difernce to the power.. not heaps but it does pull better from lower revs...
also found out that these new TD's run a cat convertor
so even with jsut one very small straight thru muffler on it, it makes no noise at all
Are you running the standard cat or a bigger one
Mate is talking about putting a 3 inch exhaust on his DID pajero
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:48 pm
by crankycruiser
rocknferoza wrote:crankycruiser wrote:Well i got my exhaust on firday.. and it has made a difernce to the power.. not heaps but it does pull better from lower revs...
also found out that these new TD's run a cat convertor
so even with jsut one very small straight thru muffler on it, it makes no noise at all
Are you running the standard cat or a bigger one
Mate is talking about putting a 3 inch exhaust on his DID pajero
Well its stil runnin the std one as the exhaust guy reckons the the diesel ones are always heaps bigger than they need to be and would be a waste of money to change..
Also i got my muffler taken out now .. so now its jsut a straight thru 3" pipe from the turbo back and it now does make a littel noise and its definatly got more go overall..
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:50 am
by Ian Sharpe
NLShorty wrote:My shorty NL paj has a 3.2 Did in it with a 2.5 inch mandrel bent system and hi flow muffler, not sure if its makes a difference as i had to mod the exhaust as part of the conversion.
Anyone know if the cat is a requirement on diesels these days?
Cheers, ben
Gidday Ben,
Hows the 3.2 going>? Do you regret getting rid of the 3.5l & SC??
cheers
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:22 am
by NLShorty
Hi Ian,
The 3.2 is going great, no problems at all so far, put over 10k on it already with a couple of trips to the high country and coffs coast.
No regrets with doing the changeover from the s/c v6 to the Did, only let down i have found so far is probaly on the freeway/overtaking, where the petrol would blow the Did away, but then again it was supercharged!
Cant believe the difference in fuel economy though especially when 4wding. Last trip to the High country was with my brither who has a 4.0 vvti prado, did the same kays and his truck did 24.5 litres/100 and my paj did 16 litres/100. Pretty happy with that.
Have considered puitting a Dtronic or DP chip on it, as it already has a much larger intercooler than standard, an extra oil cooler and a straight through 2.5 mandrel exhaust, so the chip would probaly unleash a heap more power and take advantage of these mods but i dont know weather its worth it for the sake of compromising long term reliability.
Cheer's, Ben
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 11:50 am
by crankycruiser
NLShorty wrote:Hi Ian,
Have considered puitting a Dtronic or DP chip on it, as it already has a much larger intercooler than standard, an extra oil cooler and a straight through 2.5 mandrel exhaust, so the chip would probaly unleash a heap more power and take advantage of these mods but i dont know weather its worth it for the sake of compromising long term reliability.
Cheer's, Ben
this is the same delema im havin at the mo.. not sure wat the DP chip wil do to long term relability..
and they already go very well as they are...
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:33 pm
by Ian Sharpe
NLShorty wrote:Hi Ian,
The 3.2 is going great, no problems at all so far, put over 10k on it already with a couple of trips to the high country and coffs coast.
Cheer's, Ben
Glad you are pleased with the 3.2!
cheers
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:46 pm
by Bitsamissin
Ian my missus has got a new NP 3.2DiD GLX auto.
I call it the "Clacker Jabber" as it's still a Jabber but goes clack, clack, clack..................
It goes very well indeed - economy is awesome 800K's + from 90ltrs no worries.
My 3.5 DOHC would beat it in outright acceleration from a standing start but not by much I can tell you. The 3.2 would have the edge on rolling acceleration though thats where they really perform with all that torque.
Down low around 2000rpm the 3.2 is also tops.
You would have to keep the 3.5 DOHC on the constant boil (and I mean 5-6000rpm) to see off a well driven 3.2.
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:21 pm
by Ian Sharpe
Bitsamissin wrote:Ian my missus has got a new NP 3.2DiD GLX auto.
I call it the "Clacker Jabber" as it's still a Jabber but goes clack, clack, clack..................
It goes very well indeed - economy is awesome 800K's + from 90ltrs no worries.
My 3.5 DOHC would beat it in outright acceleration from a standing start but not by much I can tell you. The 3.2 would have the edge on rolling acceleration though thats where they really perform with all that torque.
Down low around 2000rpm the 3.2 is also tops.
You would have to keep the 3.5 DOHC on the constant boil (and I mean 5-6000rpm) to see off a well driven 3.2.
\
Frank,
You seem to have Pajeros everywhere!!!!!!!!!!!!
A 2 Pajero family, dual Pajs
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:46 pm
by Bitsamissin
Yep - twin Jabber family.
And one's a Clacker Jabber - I never ever thought I would own a diesel but there ya go..............
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:46 pm
by Rugrat
Frank,
you can roll diesels (not that either of us want to do it again) get em up right and the buggers fire - cough weeze, blow out the smelly black stuff and then putter on as though nothings happened
Run on oily rag as well.
Love my diesel... doubt i'll got back to ulp But they aint the quickest of things - even when chipped