Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

LPG stroker

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply
Posts: 347
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 4:22 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT

LPG stroker

Post by Gordo »

Hi, I'm converting my Jeep 4.0L 6 to lpg-only this April and want to complete a long-overdue 4.7L stroker project at the same time.

From my research it appears the ideal CR i'm after is 12:1 to 14:1 (stock is just under 9:1)

Has anyone done this (ie a high/er CR, naturally-aspirated lpg stroker either v8 or 6) or know of any good links for info ?

I mainly want to clear up whether the stock 4.0L bottom end (currently 140k on the motor) will like such a raise in CR or if big $$ are needed to prevent kaboom or spat head gaskets.

tia :)
97 TJ [i]Goatsack[/i]
Posts: 144
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 3:45 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by hillbilly »

sounds way too high ( 14:1 ) to run on pump fuel unless
you are running a fuggin huge cam.
But I'm more holden than jeep.


Rather than fork out thousands on the stroker, force some air into
it with better results allround.



.
Posts: 144
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 3:45 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by hillbilly »

hahaha....my bad (the gas thing)
I should learn to read properly.



But still go for the forced induction (with less cr). :D




.
Posts: 2752
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 10:46 pm
Location: Carrum Downs Vic

Post by CRUSHU »

12 or 14 to one is too high, even for straight LPG.
www.CVEPerformance.com

Crushu F150 Buildup: http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/ftopic21987.php&highlight=crushu
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 5:09 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by jessie928 »

you can easily run 12: 1 comp on LPG, but it will be much more tempremental to LPG with a low butane content.

you should at that compression run proper gas cam and set your ignition timing curve properly.

jes
ATTACH BROKEN TOYOTA HERE--->
DUCATI <-----Worlds best warning label
Posts: 2752
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 10:46 pm
Location: Carrum Downs Vic

Post by CRUSHU »

I would consider 12 : 1 on a propane engine, but not LPG, the butane is no good for fuel.
www.CVEPerformance.com

Crushu F150 Buildup: http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/ftopic21987.php&highlight=crushu
Posts: 826
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 4:18 pm
Location: Northern NSW

Post by slosh »

I'm building mild Cleveland with 224 @ .50 cam on straight gas... I asked around and general opinion was 10.0 to 1 compression, even Gas Research said that. Originally was hoping to go a bit higher than that the quality of LPG isn't so great anymore I've been told.
BTW if running alloy head(s) 11.0 to 1 would be acceptable.
Posts: 347
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 4:22 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT

Post by Gordo »

mmm thanks for the feedback

I guess the 12-14:1 range I was looking at was more propane-based. Is there really that much extra non-propane in our lpg ? I guess so...

Have got a gas cam ready to go and was keen to up the cr a little as the pistons have to be custom made anyway so can order to suit.

Dismissed the idea of either super/turbo charging long ago for a million reasons - main one... I'm a tightarse :)

aint keen for the $$ alloy head. am just going to run a flowed stocker cast one with bigger valves.

as part of the stroker install an adjustable map sensor is going in for fine tuning but I'm keeping the factory computer. may have to address this later with an add-on chip.
97 TJ [i]Goatsack[/i]
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 145 guests