Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Disc guards - are they necessary?

Tech Talk for Rover owners.

Moderator: Micka

Post Reply
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Sunshine Coast QLD

Disc guards - are they necessary?

Post by Mark2 »

Currently reassembing my new disc rear end. I'm seriously thinking about ditching the guards. I think it would be easier to clean out the brakes, monitor the condition of the rotors, less chance of sticks and stuff getting caught up as well. Its hard to see how the disc could get damaged anyway.

Does anyone have a compelling reason for keeping them on?
Posts: 3278
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:03 pm
Location: St Helena, Melbourne.

Post by Loanrangie »

I cant see any reason not to keep them, with the wheel in front and the guard at the rear you are less likely to damage anything not that it would happen much. I always take a wheel off every now and then just to check the discs/pads.
Saddle up tonto, its the not so loanrangie! . 98 TDI DISCO lightly modded with more to come.
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Canada

Post by red90 »

Ditch them. They hold mud and rocks and contribute to pad wear.
[color=red]1991 Landrover 90 ex-MOD[/color]
Posts: 2158
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:16 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by KiwiBacon »

Their function on the front seems to be limited to keeping swivel oil off the discs.
Posts: 3064
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Yinnar South, Vic

Post by cloughy »

KiwiBacon wrote:Their function on the front seems to be limited to keeping swivel oil off the discs.
:rofl:
Wanted: Car trailer or beaver tail truck, let me know what you got
Posts: 490
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 3:44 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Philip A »

I had no guards on my 77 rangie, and I found that in sand the rear pads disappeared at an amazing rate.

I once went to Fraser for a week. Went there with about 50% pads, got back to Tewantin with metal only. yikes.

And I am really careful not to use brakes on sand.

regards Philip A
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Sunshine Coast QLD

Post by Mark2 »

Philip A wrote:I had no guards on my 77 rangie, and I found that in sand the rear pads disappeared at an amazing rate.

I once went to Fraser for a week. Went there with about 50% pads, got back to Tewantin with metal only. yikes.

And I am really careful not to use brakes on sand.

regards Philip A
I would have thought the guards had the potential to keep sand in there........
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 8:21 pm
Location: North Brissy

Post by subaman »

I would say for offroad use they just end up bent and get in the way more than anything. Thats my 2 cents.
gas grass or arse no one rides for free
Posts: 2588
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:45 pm
Location: Hobart Tas

Post by Reddo »

I think the problem with excesive pad wear is due to mud and sand collecting on top of the caliper, above the pads and feeding into the gap between the pad and the disc, acting like grinding compound. Not much you can do about this other than retro fit a shield of some sort atop the calipers (an idea to ponder). But best to leave any shield that's on there as a precaution against more mud and sand accumulating around the brake/pad area.

I've even heard of some serious off roaders pushing pads back and locking off rear brakes to prevent excessive pad wear on trips where they know brakes are not going to be in demand. Southport for example in Tassie (now shut) was a b'tard on brakes - one set per trip was not uncommon. Had to do with the fine silty quartz suspended in the peaty water logged soils. Was great for bearings and seals too.
Nice gq swb ute chop with a huffer for the good times
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:28 pm
Location: Eastern Sector

Post by mickrangie »

red90 wrote:Ditch them. They hold mud and rocks and contribute to pad wear.
Yep too true!! they act like shovels!! Loose them!
TD5 96 Discovery UTE.
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Canada

Post by red90 »

Reddo wrote:I think the problem with excesive pad wear is due to mud and sand collecting on top of the caliper, above the pads and feeding into the gap between the pad and the disc, acting like grinding compound. Not much you can do about this other than retro fit a shield of some sort atop the calipers (an idea to ponder). But best to leave any shield that's on there as a precaution against more mud and sand accumulating around the brake/pad area.
Except that with the stock guards, it is almost impossible to clean all of the mud out after a run, so they continue to grind during street use. Without the guards, the calipers are easily and fully cleaned.
[color=red]1991 Landrover 90 ex-MOD[/color]
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:39 pm
Location: In a horse near you

Post by chimpboy »

Can you keep the guards but modify them so you can blast water through them to clear them out?
This is not legal advice.
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:28 pm
Location: Eastern Sector

Post by mickrangie »

chimpboy wrote:Can you keep the guards but modify them so you can blast water through them to clear them out?
you can modify them with a F*&king sledge hammer and that might make them 2% ok...... trust us they are more pain then they are good.....
TD5 96 Discovery UTE.
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

They must provide some benefit. I noticed on all the WRC cars (at the LAST EVER Perth WRC round) that they all had guards made from 2-3mm (approx) steel plate with heaps of 6mm holes driilled in them (don't know if for weight or ease of cleaning).

Now I am sure if they were completely unnecessary they would ditch them.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 2158
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:16 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by KiwiBacon »

ISUZUROVER wrote:They must provide some benefit. I noticed on all the WRC cars (at the LAST EVER Perth WRC round) that they all had guards made from 2-3mm (approx) steel plate with heaps of 6mm holes driilled in them (don't know if for weight or ease of cleaning).

Now I am sure if they were completely unnecessary they would ditch them.
Surely on a WRC car they'd be to stop thrown stones from damaging the rotors.
Vent holes would make sense too.

I know the last time my turbo hose came apart, the rear disc guards kept all the oil off the brakes.
Posts: 1575
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:50 pm
Location: Moronfield....

Post by nottie »

Plus on say a hilux you usually have a scoop like thing off the front of them to direct air onto the disc for cooling.
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:28 pm
Location: Eastern Sector

Post by mickrangie »

ok i think we are missing the point! A WRC car is going fast and needs the brakes cooled....... that why they have them with out getting all technical

My rangie dosn't go fast! It goes threw mud! I never seen a comp truck with stupid disc guards!!

Comparing a Land Rover to a WRC car is pretty funny so 10 points for that!
TD5 96 Discovery UTE.
Posts: 425
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by walker »

mickrangie wrote:
My rangie dosn't go fast! It goes threw mud!

I didn't think your Rangie went anywhere! :P :P :P
Thanks,

Adam
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:28 pm
Location: Eastern Sector

Post by mickrangie »

walker wrote:
mickrangie wrote:
My rangie dosn't go fast! It goes threw mud!

I didn't think your Rangie went anywhere! :P :P :P
:finger:
TD5 96 Discovery UTE.
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

mickrangie wrote:ok i think we are missing the point! A WRC car is going fast and needs the brakes cooled....... that why they have them with out getting all technical

My rangie dosn't go fast! It goes threw mud! I never seen a comp truck with stupid disc guards!!

Comparing a Land Rover to a WRC car is pretty funny so 10 points for that!
Yes, but plenty of people drive on beaches, deserts and wa pea-gravel, and often at pretty reasonable speeds. Ever seen the underneath of a car that has been on a desert trip? underneath of the car looks like it has been sandblasted...

If you are only driving slow speeds, or in mud, then I agree, they won't have any benefit. But not all of us have the misfortune to only have mud to drive in ;) :D
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:28 pm
Location: Eastern Sector

Post by mickrangie »

ISUZUROVER wrote:
mickrangie wrote:ok i think we are missing the point! A WRC car is going fast and needs the brakes cooled....... that why they have them with out getting all technical

My rangie dosn't go fast! It goes threw mud! I never seen a comp truck with stupid disc guards!!

Comparing a Land Rover to a WRC car is pretty funny so 10 points for that!
Yes, but plenty of people drive on beaches, deserts and wa pea-gravel, and often at pretty reasonable speeds. Ever seen the underneath of a car that has been on a desert trip? underneath of the car looks like it has been sandblasted...

If you are only driving slow speeds, or in mud, then I agree, they won't have any benefit. But not all of us have the misfortune to only have mud to drive in ;) :D
Yeah I guess but they still useless!!
TD5 96 Discovery UTE.
User avatar
BJ
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 2:17 am
Location: Narbethong

Post by BJ »

:rofl: I agree wth Mick
BLACKBURN 4X4 RACING
http://www.blackburn4x4.com/
http://stores.ebay.com.au/4X4-BLACKBURN
Nissan Spare Parts Direct
Ph. 03 9877 2755
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests