Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Who wants tyres? Group Buy

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:36 pm
Location: sydney

Who wants tyres? Group Buy

Post by patrol42 »

Guys,

I am after expressions of interest here..I have come across some cheap michelin tyres and wondering how many if any would be interested in a set, so I could do a group buy

The deal on these tyres is.. $500.00 each, but buy 4 and get the 5th free (thats the price if I buy 10 sets)

To give you a comparison the XZL Michelins in 24R21 retail for around the 1500.00 each mark...

I have not heard what exact sizes are available yet but the tyres are below. I am waiting on exact details of this deal, so will post the info as I get them. Not all these tyres are new, but they tell me that they are at least 90% with most more than that.


Michelin XL

Image

Size , Load Range , Overall Diameter, Overall Width
6.50R16 , D
9.00R16 , D , 36.1 , 9.8
11.00R16 , E , 38.7 , 10.9
11.00R20 , H , 43.1 , 11.1
12.50R20 , F , 40.7 , 13.1
14.00R20 , J , 49.4 , 14.7
14.5R20 , L , 43.4 , 14.4
16.00R20 , J , 53.1 , 16
14.75/80R2 , J , 45.1 , 14.4
15.5/80R20 , J , 46.6 , 15.5



XML Michelin

Image

Size , Load Range , Overall Diameter , Overall Width inches
325/85R16 , D , 38.7 , 12.9
12.00R20 , G , 44.5 , 12.2
14.00R20 , G , 49.5 , 15.1
395/85R20 , G , 46.7 , 15.4



XZL Michelin

Image

Size , Load Range , Overall Diameter , Overall Width inches
6.50R16 , D
9.00R16 , D , 36.4 , 9.9
11.00R20 , , H , 43 , 11.8
16.00R20 , M , 52.9 , 17.2
14.00R20 , J , 49.5 , 15.1
335/80R20 , F , 40.7 , 13.3
365/80R20 , L , 43.1 , 14.6
365/85R20 , J , 45 , 14.5
395/85R20 , J , 46.8 , 15.3
24R21 , H , 54.6 , 23.9
Go Portal!
[url=http://www.tractivforce.com]TractivForce[/url]
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: Narellan NSW

tyres

Post by andrew e »

you have a pm.
Posts: 1836
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:41 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by badger »

even on 3 psi these wont bag on anything short of a dump truck or franna crane :P

but cheap huge tyres
1hd-fte 5 speed tiptronic 105 series
78 series troopy for work
gu ute play truck For sale
FTE 80 series sahara Sold

i think i have a problem
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Post by Guy »

badger wrote:even on 3 psi these wont bag on anything short of a dump truck or franna crane :P

but cheap huge tyres
Not true .. have you seen the article in oneof the yank rags .. they are radials and have quite a reasonable thickness sidewall in em
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 7:04 pm

Post by MudSkull »

Pm sent...
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:36 pm
Location: sydney

Post by patrol42 »

Can I make one suggestion..as I am in Sydney, freight on these may be expensive due to their 'bulk'

I would suggest that if there are a few of you from say Melbourne, then I can organise to ship the whole lot of tyres to one address and you pick them up from that person..may save you all a bit on freight.
Go Portal!
[url=http://www.tractivforce.com]TractivForce[/url]
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: Narellan NSW

Post by andrew e »

Whats better for rocks XLs or XMLs? wasnt there a michelin that was a sticky compound, built for ice driving?


sydneys good for me. everytime i buy diffs, cars, tyres, motors etc they are either in qld, or victoria, and i have to do a weekend roadtrip. being in sydney is a first.



Andy.
Posts: 3288
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 10:15 pm
Location: Central West NSW

Post by Slunnie »

Bit more info on these tyres
http://www.militarytires.com/
Cheers
Slunnie

Discovery TD5, Landy IIa V8 ute.
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:36 pm
Location: sydney

Post by patrol42 »

I would probably say the XL's are the better rock tyre, but for Oz where Mud is also prevalent then the XML's as they look like they would sel;f clean better. Mind you they also look noisier if thats a worry.
Go Portal!
[url=http://www.tractivforce.com]TractivForce[/url]
Posts: 1857
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:16 am
Location: ipswich

Post by nastytroll »

A mate of mine runs XML 11r 16 on his 80s has had em for at least 6 years they are the older 3 lug pattern and work great. They were replaced with thr new series 328/85r16
Posts: 14668
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:10 pm
Location: western shitney

Post by j-top paj »

I could b interested if they are in a 35 or 37
Banzy wrote:Dial up internet.........you'd post something and come back 2 beers later to see if it loaded.
my GU
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

Mock ran XML's in 325/85/16 for the first Oz-Rock in late 05 (his car, I was driving)

They are very heavy but gripped and flexed surprsingly well on Mocks light car. (But broke MQ CV's like twigs)

325/85's are marked with "legal for road use in Australia" on the sidewall - can't argue with that!
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Temporary Australian
Posts: 6728
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 7:45 am
Location: somewhere........ who knows where

Post by Vulcanised »

buy up guys!! :D I'm after a set of the XML's........ they look horn :cool:
There is no "I" in Team, but there are 5 in Individual Brilliance
Road Ranger
Posts: 10722
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:21 pm
Location: In a town near you

Post by Tiny »

Patrolden wrote:buy up guys!! :D I'm after a set of the XML's........ they look horn :cool:
hmmm xmls on the 70 :cool:
If the above post did not offend you in any way please PM me so I can try harder!!
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:36 pm
Location: sydney

Post by patrol42 »

Guys I am up to six sets so far..only 4 more and we get the discount..Thanks to everyone that has replied so far..
Go Portal!
[url=http://www.tractivforce.com]TractivForce[/url]
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: mornington peninsula

Post by Mayhem Mat »

i used to fit michelin earthmover tyres and i see some potential probs with these tyres on a road going 4x4
1st prob is the extra weight aprox 25 kg over conventional 4x4 tyre the same size. alot more strain of bearings, axles, cv's etc
2nd/ far to rigid in the side wall for the weight of the vehicle e.g when suspension bottoms out the tyre is the next thing to soften the impact is the give in the side wall of the tyre. no give in the side wall so axle housings bend and thngs break.
don't want to be a downer but thought that these are points that you my not be aware of
at the end of the day it is up to you but these tyres are designed for 20 to 30 tonne equipment not 1 to 3 tonne 4x4's
got GQ Lwb much cooler than my old XJ jeep
Road Ranger
Posts: 10722
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:21 pm
Location: In a town near you

Post by Tiny »

Mayhem Mat wrote:i used to fit michelin earthmover tyres and i see some potential probs with these tyres on a road going 4x4
1st prob is the extra weight aprox 25 kg over conventional 4x4 tyre the same size. alot more strain of bearings, axles, cv's etc
2nd/ far to rigid in the side wall for the weight of the vehicle e.g when suspension bottoms out the tyre is the next thing to soften the impact is the give in the side wall of the tyre. no give in the side wall so axle housings bend and thngs break.
don't want to be a downer but thought that these are points that you my not be aware of
at the end of the day it is up to you but these tyres are designed for 20 to 30 tonne equipment not 1 to 3 tonne 4x4's
XMLs etc are not a new option for 4wdrives, they have being used my a heap of people, often with larger rigs as a road tyre, I need something other than the 44 boggers to run on the road anbd for a light trip, something like this is ideal, despite being a big commercial equipment tyre, and they would not be heavier imo than a 44 bogger
If the above post did not offend you in any way please PM me so I can try harder!!
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:36 pm
Location: sydney

Post by patrol42 »

Mayhem Mat wrote:i used to fit michelin earthmover tyres and i see some potential probs with these tyres on a road going 4x4
1st prob is the extra weight aprox 25 kg over conventional 4x4 tyre the same size. alot more strain of bearings, axles, cv's etc
2nd/ far to rigid in the side wall for the weight of the vehicle e.g when suspension bottoms out the tyre is the next thing to soften the impact is the give in the side wall of the tyre. no give in the side wall so axle housings bend and thngs break.
don't want to be a downer but thought that these are points that you my not be aware of
at the end of the day it is up to you but these tyres are designed for 20 to 30 tonne equipment not 1 to 3 tonne 4x4's
I understand where your coming from but these are not earthmover tyres..are you thinking of their AG Spec tyres (such as XM47' or XMCL) , in which case thats quite true.

These three models are all considered their off road radials for soft ground, mud and sand and military use.
Go Portal!
[url=http://www.tractivforce.com]TractivForce[/url]
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

I agree, the 325 XML's whilst they are heavy, do flex fine. They bag alarmingly on an ASLAV (their intended application)

Michelin are renowned for soft, flexible tyres.

Steve.

PS Patrol42 i hope you didn't think I was ordering a set, I don't have anything even remotely big enough, but will spread the word about the 9.00X16's

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: mornington peninsula

Post by Mayhem Mat »

i stand corrected :oops:
got GQ Lwb much cooler than my old XJ jeep
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:36 pm
Location: sydney

Post by patrol42 »

Gwagensteve wrote:I agree, the 325 XML's whilst they are heavy, do flex fine. They bag alarmingly on an ASLAV (their intended application)

Michelin are renowned for soft, flexible tyres.

Steve.

PS Patrol42 i hope you didn't think I was ordering a set, I don't have anything even remotely big enough, but will spread the word about the 9.00X16's

Steve.
LOl no mate i didnt think that ;)
Go Portal!
[url=http://www.tractivforce.com]TractivForce[/url]
Posts: 4065
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 8:31 am
Location: ACT

Post by Wendle »

Tiny wrote:and they would not be heavier imo than a 44 bogger
Yeah, they would be, they are insanely heavy.

I have a good friend that runs the 1100r16 (~39") XZL on an 80 series and after helping him change broken axle parts a few times :lol: and having to lift the wheels on and off it is unbelievable how heavy these things are. One of his 39's on a steel rim would be a good 10-15kg heavier than my 42" iroks on their steel beadlocked rims with an 8mm centre. My wheel/tyre combo comes in at 70.6kg per corner, so the 38-40" michelin sizes on a steel wheel will probably be up over 80.

I ran some ~37" XML's as a road tyre for a while years back and had to get rid of them because the weight of them made my brakes into a sad joke.

You won't beat the quality of these tyres, they make EVERYTHING else look sub-standard, they run quiet, they run cool, they work well in rocks, mud, snow and dirt, they last FOREVER, but they are real, real, heavy.

Sorry for the long post...
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Post by Guy »

Wendle wrote:
Tiny wrote:and they would not be heavier imo than a 44 bogger
Yeah, they would be, they are insanely heavy.

I have a good friend that runs the 1100r16 (~39") XZL on an 80 series and after helping him change broken axle parts a few times :lol: and having to lift the wheels on and off it is unbelievable how heavy these things are. One of his 39's on a steel rim would be a good 10-15kg heavier than my 42" iroks on their steel beadlocked rims with an 8mm centre. My wheel/tyre combo comes in at 70.6kg per corner, so the 38-40" michelin sizes on a steel wheel will probably be up over 80.

I ran some ~37" XML's as a road tyre for a while years back and had to get rid of them because the weight of them made my brakes into a sad joke.

You won't beat the quality of these tyres, they make EVERYTHING else look sub-standard, they run quiet, they run cool, they work well in rocks, mud, snow and dirt, they last FOREVER, but they are real, real, heavy.

Sorry for the long post...
How much would a decent quaility alloy rim help in reducing the weight ?
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Road Ranger
Posts: 10722
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:21 pm
Location: In a town near you

Post by Tiny »

love_mud wrote:
Wendle wrote:
Tiny wrote:and they would not be heavier imo than a 44 bogger
Yeah, they would be, they are insanely heavy.

I have a good friend that runs the 1100r16 (~39") XZL on an 80 series and after helping him change broken axle parts a few times :lol: and having to lift the wheels on and off it is unbelievable how heavy these things are. One of his 39's on a steel rim would be a good 10-15kg heavier than my 42" iroks on their steel beadlocked rims with an 8mm centre. My wheel/tyre combo comes in at 70.6kg per corner, so the 38-40" michelin sizes on a steel wheel will probably be up over 80.

I ran some ~37" XML's as a road tyre for a while years back and had to get rid of them because the weight of them made my brakes into a sad joke.

You won't beat the quality of these tyres, they make EVERYTHING else look sub-standard, they run quiet, they run cool, they work well in rocks, mud, snow and dirt, they last FOREVER, but they are real, real, heavy.

Sorry for the long post...
How much would a decent quaility alloy rim help in reducing the weight ?
hmmm, wouldnt have thought that

performace alloy have some good alloy options for strenght ot looks, not sure if they whould have them in a suitable size, but then again I am not sure the weight would be much different considering the overall weight of the tyre :shock:
If the above post did not offend you in any way please PM me so I can try harder!!
Posts: 1857
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:16 am
Location: ipswich

Post by nastytroll »

the 11.00r16 WENDLE is speaking of are on 80s gxl rims n are half worn n weigh 68kg each we checked them last time we rotated them
Posts: 4065
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 8:31 am
Location: ACT

Post by Wendle »

nastytroll wrote:the 11.00r16 WENDLE is speaking of are on 80s gxl rims n are half worn n weigh 68kg each we checked them last time we rotated them
I would have thought that they would weigh in a bit more than that, still fawking heavy for a half gone, skinny radial tyre though :lol:
Within a few kg of a taller, wider, brand new, bias ply super swamper tyre on a stupidly heavy, beadlocked wheel. :lol:
Road Ranger
Posts: 10722
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:21 pm
Location: In a town near you

Post by Tiny »

Wendle wrote:
nastytroll wrote:the 11.00r16 WENDLE is speaking of are on 80s gxl rims n are half worn n weigh 68kg each we checked them last time we rotated them
I would have thought that they would weigh in a bit more than that, still fawking heavy for a half gone, skinny radial tyre though :lol:
Within a few kg of a taller, wider, brand new, bias ply super swamper tyre on a stupidly heavy, beadlocked wheel. :lol:
which as anyone who has tried lufing them around knows is fawkin heavy I thought 36 pedes on beadlocked rims were a PITA until I :oops:ot the boggers :oops: :oops:
If the above post did not offend you in any way please PM me so I can try harder!!
Posts: 14668
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:10 pm
Location: western shitney

Post by j-top paj »

why cant they make the XLs in a 35x12.5 :cry:
Banzy wrote:Dial up internet.........you'd post something and come back 2 beers later to see if it loaded.
my GU
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

Because they make them in a better size..... 36X10 :armsup:

I really can't think of a situation where a 35 12.5 would be better than a 9.00X16 XL offroad, especially on a heavy car like a GU

XL's have a fairly high wear rate though, but they are regroovable.

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 14668
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:10 pm
Location: western shitney

Post by j-top paj »

but 10 is too narrow :cry:
Banzy wrote:Dial up internet.........you'd post something and come back 2 beers later to see if it loaded.
my GU
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests