Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
WARNING: DECC (EPA) are proposing NEW noise laws.
Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators
but unfortunately the laws would also make it hard for people doing simple mods to their exhaust that will improve it.
as for the tosspots on the harleys that make that much noise then i have no sympathy for them if they get fined. that much noise is excessive and unnesescary in my opinion
as for the tosspots on the harleys that make that much noise then i have no sympathy for them if they get fined. that much noise is excessive and unnesescary in my opinion
my GUBanzy wrote:Dial up internet.........you'd post something and come back 2 beers later to see if it loaded.
I dont think i can show you one, i doubt many exist, but theres no reason it cant be built.KiwiBacon wrote:I'd like you to show me an aftermarket exhaust which improves performance, econonomy and emissions while staying within the noise regs.wrksux wrote:KiwiBacon wrote:I keep hearing this, but I have yet to see it proven.Highway-Star wrote:What a PITA, dont they understand some aftermarket exhausts improve emissions; and make the engine more efficient.
Car companies spend billions designing their cars, if it were possible to get more power and better fuel economy from an exhaust while staying within the noise regs then they'd do it.
But you wrote this didnt you?
ffs you are an idiot arent ya
I don't think you could. No matter how many times you want to misread what I write.
Cost is a big reason manufacturerers go for LOG style headers, pressed bends, mass manufactured cheap cat's etc.
Go for high flow cats, mandrel bends, extractors, resonators, theres absolutely no reason you cant make an exhaust that beats the OEM system in performance, noise, and emmisions. Just dont cry when the exhaust shop gives you the bill.
Highway-Star " thats why you own a Harley" maybe you need a few more years of engineering to find out the difference between a honda and a harley, which is like saying a gq is the same as a 40s......... heres a PIC OF MY OUT OF DATE BIKE http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v692/ ... CBR600.jpg[/quote]
0422948007
I'm not taking sides, but if you redone a OEM system with mandrel bent stainless, different cat and a good quality muffler, you would see gains in power and economy, and the same size pipe would keep the noise to a minimum.KiwiBacon wrote:I'd like you to show me an aftermarket exhaust which improves performance, econonomy and emissions while staying within the noise regs.wrksux wrote:KiwiBacon wrote:I keep hearing this, but I have yet to see it proven.Highway-Star wrote:What a PITA, dont they understand some aftermarket exhausts improve emissions; and make the engine more efficient.
Car companies spend billions designing their cars, if it were possible to get more power and better fuel economy from an exhaust while staying within the noise regs then they'd do it.
But you wrote this didnt you?
ffs you are an idiot arent ya
I don't think you could. No matter how many times you want to misread what I write.
The main reason people use larger diameter pipes on thier exhaust is its cheaper.
It is cheaper to get an 'okay' larger system, than a spot on smaller piped system, as a lot more manufacturing work would go into installing it.
Instead of getting a mandrel bent, finely tuned 2" system with a muffler with good flow and noise properties, it is cheaper for the rice boys to get a 2.5" or 3" system with press bends and a larger cheaper 'performance' muffler.
[quote="RockyF70 - Coming out of the closet"]i'd be rushing out and buying an IFS rocky[/quote]
[/quote]Fleming wrote:Highway-Star " thats why you own a Harley" maybe you need a few more years of engineering to find out the difference between a honda and a harley, which is like saying a gq is the same as a 40s......... heres a PIC OF MY OUT OF DATE BIKE http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v692/ ... CBR600.jpg
I'm sorry, I'm not picking up on what your saying? I never tried comparing a Honda and a Harley... I never even mentioned a Honda? The only thing Honda and Harley share in common is that when you buy one, you pay extra just for the 'name'.
Your out of date bike is on an out of date page too bud, it doens't work .
I don't own a harley, and yes some exhausts on them are too loud, but in my opinion (my taste, its not everyones cup of tea, i get that; so dont have a hissy), they can sound nice.
Anyway I think j-top paj pointed out the biggest flaw with any strict law changes, the effect on business.
So continue to enjoy your argument, because there isn't much constructiveness left here!
Wheeling on completely wicked angles, without even looking stable.
Road Ranger
I hear things like this all the time, car manafactureres spend millions to blah blah blahKiwiBacon wrote:I keep hearing this, but I have yet to see it proven.Highway-Star wrote:What a PITA, dont they understand some aftermarket exhausts improve emissions; and make the engine more efficient.
Car companies spend billions designing their cars, if it were possible to get more power and better fuel economy from an exhaust while staying within the noise regs then they'd do it.
Exhaust flows at cruise are a fraction of full power, which is why putting a 3" exhaust on a 1.8L japanese 4 cylinder offers no fuel economy benefit at all.
Don't get me started on those muppets who put an echo chamber on the last 3 inches of their exhaust and claim it's a "performance exhaust".
imo they spend millions to develop a product that is a happy medium, people dont want a noisy car, they dont want to replace engine soocer coz of a more free flowing filter lets some more in, they dont wantto build a 4wd suspension system that is gun offroad as it effects on road to much
If the above post did not offend you in any way please PM me so I can try harder!!
Harleys don't have any laws on them about the noise they make, from what I have been told by people.Highway-Star wrote: That being copied from a motorcycle forum, I can see a bunch of HD owners chucking a massive shirty, thats why you own a Harley, they sound so pleasant with a de-baffled exhaust.
Though sports bikes and everything else does.
that's why they can get away with it, though they have to pull you over then have a look around then work out what to do then fine first before it'd affect anyone really.
bullshitzagan wrote:Harleys don't have any laws on them about the noise they make, from what I have been told by people.Highway-Star wrote: That being copied from a motorcycle forum, I can see a bunch of HD owners chucking a massive shirty, thats why you own a Harley, they sound so pleasant with a de-baffled exhaust.
Though sports bikes and everything else does.
that's why they can get away with it, though they have to pull you over then have a look around then work out what to do then fine first before it'd affect anyone really.
all motor vehicles are subject to the EPA noise guidlines.
hmm let me get this striat, all the want to do is get rid of crapy milo tin's and poorly fitted systems? if this is true then its only going to efect "boy racer" and his "fully sic carolla bro" , so i dont see a point to worry about.
mq shorty, black, rust free!!, quarter chop, F&R tube bars and sliders, q78's or 33'' stt's, 4.88's with lsd waiting to be thrown in.. :D http://www.patrol4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=9540
If you're prepared to step into a completely different set of compromises, then sure you can improve on one aspect. But it usually involves big tradeoffs in other areas.Tiny wrote:
I hear things like this all the time, car manafactureres spend millions to blah blah blah
imo they spend millions to develop a product that is a happy medium, people dont want a noisy car, they dont want to replace engine soocer coz of a more free flowing filter lets some more in, they dont wantto build a 4wd suspension system that is gun offroad as it effects on road to much
For the exhausts you've got emissions (cat converters), noise, backpressure and space. If you want to improve on one from the factory then you'll have to compromise in another.
Traditionally the noise and emissions are the two that go out the door with aftermarket exhausts, but legislation has tightened significantly.
Road Ranger
I dont dissagree that there are comprimises, but its both ways, from aftermarket and from factory gearKiwiBacon wrote:If you're prepared to step into a completely different set of compromises, then sure you can improve on one aspect. But it usually involves big tradeoffs in other areas.Tiny wrote:
I hear things like this all the time, car manafactureres spend millions to blah blah blah
imo they spend millions to develop a product that is a happy medium, people dont want a noisy car, they dont want to replace engine soocer coz of a more free flowing filter lets some more in, they dont wantto build a 4wd suspension system that is gun offroad as it effects on road to much
For the exhausts you've got emissions (cat converters), noise, backpressure and space. If you want to improve on one from the factory then you'll have to compromise in another.
Traditionally the noise and emissions are the two that go out the door with aftermarket exhausts, but legislation has tightened significantly.
If the above post did not offend you in any way please PM me so I can try harder!!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 145 guests