Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

coil sprun Salisbury front axel.

Tech Talk for Rover owners.

Moderator: Micka

Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:15 am
Location: Australia

coil sprun Salisbury front axel.

Post by mcdura »

Was there ever a version of the coil spring land rover to use that Salisbury axle up front?
Posts: 200
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 1:11 am
Location: Perth WA

Post by discokid »

Yes

Later model military vehicles. I know where one is that came out of a army defender in Ireland but Im not sure if its for sale. They are a bloody heavy diff for the front and not sure of CV size/strength either
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 6:04 pm
Location: cairns

Post by defmec »

101s
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

defmec wrote:101s
101s are leaf sprung (SOA).

But to answer the question, armoured 110s were fitted with a sals front end. They are rare as hens teeth outside northern ireland though ;)

Easier to build your own from a rear sals.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:59 am

Post by FerRi »

Here is one
Image
Image

It was bought from ebay.co.uk, came as a complete Kit with track rods, panhard and double cardan driveshaft. Halfhshafts and CV´s are standard AEU2522´s, so not worth it. This axle has custom 30 spline 1.3" shafts with longfields. No breakage so far.
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Canada

Post by red90 »

Is there point to doing this?? Even with that one above, you can only go to 30 spline, which is much weaker than the Dana 60 center. It makes more sense to put a Toy center in the Rover axle with 30 spline.
[color=red]1991 Landrover 90 ex-MOD[/color]
Posts: 3064
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Yinnar South, Vic

Post by cloughy »

red90 wrote:Is there point to doing this?? Even with that one above, you can only go to 30 spline, which is much weaker than the Dana 60 center. It makes more sense to put a Toy center in the Rover axle with 30 spline.
They're high pinion and pretty weak
Wanted: Car trailer or beaver tail truck, let me know what you got
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:59 am

Post by FerRi »

red90 wrote:Is there point to doing this?? Even with that one above, you can only go to 30 spline, which is much weaker than the Dana 60 center. It makes more sense to put a Toy center in the Rover axle with 30 spline.
I really don´t think that makes any sense! With a Toyota center, your weakest link is the Ring and Pinion. I prefer (with any doubt) to have my weakest link in 1.3" alloy steel halfshaft or in a 30 Spline Longfield than in a weak 8" reverse cut Ring Gear and Pinion...You can replace a shaft or CV much easier than a broken ring and pinion! Beside that, Toyotas in portuguese competition brake A LOT OF high pinion 3rd members (only with 35" tires or smaller and small turbo diesel engines)!! I could never trust 38.5 Boggers and 430 Nm engine torque in a toyota 8" center. I know the ground clearence is not the best, such as the weight, but for the use of this truck, I really believe this is the strongest front rover axle you can get.

Overall this setup has a far superior overall resistence and is much easier to fix in the field in case of failure.
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 3:20 am

Post by 90pickup »

But, the salisbury axles bend much more. And you can not laminate them...
Posts: 1285
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 8:22 pm
Location: gold coast

Post by uninformed »

well unless theres a major difference between the sals and dana's i don't think this is a real problem..... theres a few dana's running in trucks in the USA.....
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:15 am
Location: Australia

Post by mcdura »

Does any reckon that a converted front to Salisbury is much better than a rover type front.
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Canada

Post by red90 »

cloughy wrote:They're high pinion and pretty weak
High pinion in a front axle is stronger than low pinion... The high pinion is only a weak option in a rear axle.
[color=red]1991 Landrover 90 ex-MOD[/color]
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

uninformed wrote:well unless theres a major difference between the sals and dana's i don't think this is a real problem..... theres a few dana's running in trucks in the USA.....
Salisburies have thinner-walled tubing than a D60, which makes them lighter. IME they are pretty strong, but is easy to brace them if you are worried.

I agree with FerRi on the merits of a Sals front end.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 3064
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Yinnar South, Vic

Post by cloughy »

red90 wrote:
cloughy wrote:They're high pinion and pretty weak
High pinion in a front axle is stronger than low pinion... The high pinion is only a weak option in a rear axle.
Yep, Until you reverse back :roll:

Seen them break, in young vehicles, in reverse.......weak as piss, I'd rather a rover front in the front, Tojo rear set up
Wanted: Car trailer or beaver tail truck, let me know what you got
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Canada

Post by red90 »

cloughy wrote:Tojo rear set up
A low pinion rear is just as weak in reverse as the high pinion front :roll:

People need to learn how to drive....

A Salisbury/Dana 60 should have 35 spline. No point otherwise.
[color=red]1991 Landrover 90 ex-MOD[/color]
Posts: 3064
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Yinnar South, Vic

Post by cloughy »

red90 wrote:
cloughy wrote:Tojo rear set up
A low pinion rear is just as weak in reverse as the high pinion front :roll:

People need to learn how to drive....

A Salisbury/Dana 60 should have 35 spline. No point otherwise.
Yep,sure :roll:
Wanted: Car trailer or beaver tail truck, let me know what you got
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:59 am

Post by FerRi »

red90 wrote:
cloughy wrote:Tojo rear set up
A low pinion rear is just as weak in reverse as the high pinion front :roll:

People need to learn how to drive....

A Salisbury/Dana 60 should have 35 spline. No point otherwise.
The rear Salisbury in this truck has 35 spline because it is easy to convert. The front is only possible by going open knucle...that means building an entire axle from scratch...a lot more work and LOT more expensive. And you can´t find front Dana60s easily in Europe.

So this front Salisbury is pretty much a bolt on solution. The 1.3" shafts are rated at 1750 Mpa Tensile Strength and the Longfields are stronger than a Spicer Dana60 UJ (Longfield Website data), so I believe this axle is not very far in strength to a standard 35 splined Dana60.

Like I said before, for the use of this truck, a Toyota 3rd member is not an option...too weak. And I´ve seen them break going front also, not just reverse.

So, in the end, I do believe it is easier to go front Salisbury than actually learning how to drive :finger:
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

red90 wrote:
cloughy wrote:Tojo rear set up
A low pinion rear is just as weak in reverse as the high pinion front :roll:

People need to learn how to drive....

A Salisbury/Dana 60 should have 35 spline. No point otherwise.
I agree - plenty of people need to learn how to drive - especially americans... ;)

However - with a 30spl longfield setup the ring and pinion is the weak point. I don't see the problem with having a salisbury centre and 30slp outers. If the sals is shaved the difference in clearance is only about 1" - and you have a lot more strength.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Canada

Post by red90 »

It is a whole lot of work to get no better than swapping in a Toy center, with more weight plus propshaft and clearance issues to deal with.

If Salisbury fronts were a dime a dozen, it would make sense, but they are not.

Might as well pull a 60 front out a junkyard here and have it shipped over. You guys are so scared of shipping. The LR community in Canada brings in containers from the UK twice a year. You all need to learn to work together.

People here (that know what they are doing) would never run over 35" with 30 spline and never go to a 60 at that size.
[color=red]1991 Landrover 90 ex-MOD[/color]
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:59 am

Post by FerRi »

A 30 splined Longfield Salisbury is strong enough for the truck above. A 30 splined Toyota isn´t. The salisbury is bolt on. The Toyota center isn´t. Very hard to break a 60 center. Easy to break a toyota center. That is my point.
Posts: 3064
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Yinnar South, Vic

Post by cloughy »

red90 wrote:It is a whole lot of work to get no better than swapping in a Toy center, with more weight plus propshaft and clearance issues to deal with.

If Salisbury fronts were a dime a dozen, it would make sense, but they are not.

Might as well pull a 60 front out a junkyard here and have it shipped over. You guys are so scared of shipping. The LR community in Canada brings in containers from the UK twice a year. You all need to learn to work together.

People here (that know what they are doing) would never run over 35" with 30 spline and never go to a 60 at that size.
Yet you'd comfortably run a reverse cut, high pinion Tojo 8" centre on +35's and claim its stronger :rofl:
Wanted: Car trailer or beaver tail truck, let me know what you got
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

red90 wrote:It is a whole lot of work to get no better than swapping in a Toy center, with more weight plus propshaft and clearance issues to deal with.

If Salisbury fronts were a dime a dozen, it would make sense, but they are not.

Might as well pull a 60 front out a junkyard here and have it shipped over. You guys are so scared of shipping. The LR community in Canada brings in containers from the UK twice a year. You all need to learn to work together.

People here (that know what they are doing) would never run over 35" with 30 spline and never go to a 60 at that size.
I just bought a sals for AUD$200. How much would a D60 cost - prices I have seen are US$600-1000ish??? Then there would be shipping on top of that. Then it is still not bolt in - I would need to change the width, get custom axles made, change stud pattern etc... By the time I have started it would be just as much work as starting with a sals. Longfields seem to be about as strong as OEM 35 splines (though naturally less than aftermarket 35s).

If you want an easy swap in OZ fit 60/80 series or GQ/GU axles.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: Narellan NSW

Post by andrew e »

ISUZUROVER wrote:I just bought a sals for AUD$200. How much would a D60 cost - prices I have seen are US$600-1000ish??? Then there would be shipping on top of that. Then it is still not bolt in - I would need to change the width, get custom axles made, change stud pattern etc... By the time I have started it would be just as much work as starting with a sals. Longfields seem to be about as strong as OEM 35 splines (though naturally less than aftermarket 35s).
Brakes too. To fit a D60 in the front of a rover is a nightmare. A 24 spline sals with new longs would be easier and way cheaper. You would still need to lengthen/shorten axle tubes, but apart from that its almost a bolt in fit. A toy center would be an easier to conversion though not as strong.
Posts: 4990
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 7:22 pm
Location: Qld, Hilux Country

Post by bubs »

red90 wrote:
cloughy wrote:Tojo rear set up
A low pinion rear is just as weak in reverse as the high pinion front :roll:
After running high pinions in hilux's fronts before I would much rather a low pinion in the front.

High and Low Pinions are very very similar in strength in forward direction.

Low pinions are far stronger than a high pinion in reverse.

Knowing I can quickly snap reverse and not imediatly hear the snap of pinon far outways the disadvantage of the lower drive shaft.

I know guys who do the toy swap this is not an option as the steering is behind the axle.

In a rear application, I have only broken them due to bearing failures, the gears were in correctly set-up or just plain getting it going forward.
http://www.budscustoms.com.au
Like us and follow on facebook for up to date information of what we are working on and great random specials!

Custom Parts & Fabrication!
Ph: 0417 708 598
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 6:04 pm
Location: cairns

Post by defmec »

ever tried pegging the diff bubs
Posts: 4990
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 7:22 pm
Location: Qld, Hilux Country

Post by bubs »

defmec wrote:ever tried pegging the diff bubs
??
http://www.budscustoms.com.au
Like us and follow on facebook for up to date information of what we are working on and great random specials!

Custom Parts & Fabrication!
Ph: 0417 708 598
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 4:07 am
Location: Scotland

Post by 1tonsoup »

Okay, I know as much about this as I do about the space shuttle, but surely it doesn't make any difference if it's high or low pinion so long as all other factors are the same. In other words, as long as you are running on the same side of the gear teeth, you should have the same strength. The exception being reverse cut gears - sure you have all the strength in the world when bouncing up hills going forward, but get stuck with your front end in a ditch and you'll always going to break the front R&P. Educate me! ;) Are the Toy hi-pinion fronts reverse cut or something?
ex-mil 109 FFR, rotten 110 Tdi, XJ 4.0
Posts: 3064
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Yinnar South, Vic

Post by cloughy »

Yes
Wanted: Car trailer or beaver tail truck, let me know what you got
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 6:04 pm
Location: cairns

Post by defmec »

does diff pegging work as good as they say
Posts: 1285
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 8:22 pm
Location: gold coast

Post by uninformed »

diff pegging if done properly will take some of the flex out of the crown wheel and pinion...... but you can only polish a turd so much...

saying this i am happy to stick with rover front with Maxidrive. run r606665 cv and use the stub axle as a fuse. i don't wheel that hard hell more soft than anything. so this will do me fine.

mine is a daily driver so high km reliability is a big factor for me.

i'm sorry but how can a toy 8 inch crw+p be as strong as a sals?????

cheers, serg
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests