has anybody running the 32/36 webber carby had a emmissions test done?
i did mine at tafe today and it was shocking...
HC 3312 ppm - unburnt fuel, should be 100- 150 ppm.
CO 0.04 % - very deadly, good
CO2 5.13% - should be 16%
O2 13.02% - should be 3 -6 %
NO 71 ppm - Ok
A/F ratio 28.59 : 1 - should be 14.7 : 1
good thing im getting a new engine very soon
Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
emissions
I'm surprised the system even pretended to measure an A/F of 28.59:1........
I think you might find its accuracy is very sus at that sort of reading - there just no way petrol is combustible at that ratio.
It might have been the mass of the unburnt fuel pushing the pistons down
P.S. I hate carbies too.
I think you might find its accuracy is very sus at that sort of reading - there just no way petrol is combustible at that ratio.
It might have been the mass of the unburnt fuel pushing the pistons down
P.S. I hate carbies too.
( usual disclaimers )
It seemed like a much better idea when I started it than it does now.
It seemed like a much better idea when I started it than it does now.
Yea id also like to know how ya got a reading like that. Must be an ultra wide band o2 sensor or something. Best ive seen from a wide band is 17:1 at atmosphere. Would like to know how accurate the equipment is. Try and run a comparison to a zuk the samish condition to urs but with the standard carb.MightyMouse wrote:I'm surprised the system even pretended to measure an A/F of 28.59:1........
I think you might find its accuracy is very sus at that sort of reading - there just no way petrol is combustible at that ratio.
It might have been the mass of the unburnt fuel pushing the pistons down
P.S. I hate carbies too.
Cheers Dan
Van-tastic!
Posts: 6107
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:22 pm
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:22 pm
Location: .."I MIGHT NOT AGREE WITH WHAT YOU SAY, BUT ILL DEFEND YOUR RIGHT TO SAY IT".
JrZook wrote: Yea id also like to know how ya got a reading like that. Must be an ultra wide band o2 sensor or something. Best ive seen from a wide band is 17:1 at atmosphere. Would like to know how accurate the equipment is. Try and run a comparison to a zuk the samish condition to urs but with the standard carb.
Cheers Dan
i used a proper 5 gas analyser, it samples the gas mixture and can give a little printout. it is very expensive so i took the oppertunity while i had the chance.
i also have a dead miss on #3 cylinder at idle.
Which sounds like it's way lean....alien wrote:sounds like its way out of tune to me too.... mine ran more efficient and smelt far cleaner when i chucked the weber on. It did however ping on 92 ron fuel, so 98 ron in and it purrs beautifully.
Crackatinny, are you sure the miss isn't because its sooo far beyond rich the spark is getting snuffed out?
Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests