Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

What springs are you guys using???

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Posts: 1676
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:26 am
Location: brisbane

Post by 1MadEngineer »

got Rangie rears in front
and 4 sj80's in rear :lol:
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by purefmx »

atm- im running standard leaves front and rear. Currently toying with the idea of removing the load leaves and adding coils to compensate for the curb height, failing that ive also been told of using one coil mounted in the centre of the rear differential to retain height and then removing 2 leaves for added flex
1985 LWB Suzuki Sierra, Lock-Rite Rear, SPOA, 2" Body Lift, Climax shackles, Rancho's,
Series 1 Rockhoppers, 31x11.5 MT'S, "To return from the dead very sooooon!"
[url]http://www.cyberdesigns.tk[/url]
[url]http://www.purefmx.tk[/url]
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 1:37 pm
Location: New Zealand home of the warriors

Post by Luigi Malone »

purefmx wrote:atm- im running standard leaves front and rear. Currently toying with the idea of removing the load leaves and adding coils to compensate for the curb height, failing that ive also been told of using one coil mounted in the centre of the rear differential to retain height and then removing 2 leaves for added flex


Thought of getting some FOX airshox? Some in the USA are running them with no springs at all.
LM
It's better to have LIVED for a day than to have EXISTED for a hundred years.
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by purefmx »

Luigi Malone wrote:
purefmx wrote:atm- im running standard leaves front and rear. Currently toying with the idea of removing the load leaves and adding coils to compensate for the curb height, failing that ive also been told of using one coil mounted in the centre of the rear differential to retain height and then removing 2 leaves for added flex


Thought of getting some FOX airshox? Some in the USA are running them with no springs at all.
LM


Holy smokes!
Load em up eh
1985 LWB Suzuki Sierra, Lock-Rite Rear, SPOA, 2" Body Lift, Climax shackles, Rancho's,
Series 1 Rockhoppers, 31x11.5 MT'S, "To return from the dead very sooooon!"
[url]http://www.cyberdesigns.tk[/url]
[url]http://www.purefmx.tk[/url]
Minion #1
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 8:18 pm
Location: Wollongong

Post by Surfection »

Pics of the air shocks sitting and WORKING, they look like once they're set up & dialed in they could be good. For anyone that doesn't know they're 14" travel, they require nitrogen gas and oil of which i'm not sure. You add/subtract gas to get your height right and add/subtract oil to get your 'spring' rate right. [i think anyway]
@ US$225 each they're not too bad if you're considering coilovers. HTH :D
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by purefmx »

simple problem solved! Im on the phone....just kidding, certainly seem to cut out the hassle with setting up suspension. Best of both worlds
1985 LWB Suzuki Sierra, Lock-Rite Rear, SPOA, 2" Body Lift, Climax shackles, Rancho's,
Series 1 Rockhoppers, 31x11.5 MT'S, "To return from the dead very sooooon!"
[url]http://www.cyberdesigns.tk[/url]
[url]http://www.purefmx.tk[/url]
Minion #1
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 8:18 pm
Location: Wollongong

Post by Surfection »

BTW, these pics are of Billavista's buggy off pirate. :D
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by purefmx »

nice! :D
1985 LWB Suzuki Sierra, Lock-Rite Rear, SPOA, 2" Body Lift, Climax shackles, Rancho's,
Series 1 Rockhoppers, 31x11.5 MT'S, "To return from the dead very sooooon!"
[url]http://www.cyberdesigns.tk[/url]
[url]http://www.purefmx.tk[/url]
Posts: 2817
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 10:10 pm
Location: Hellbourne again

Post by bigsteve »

purefmx wrote:atm- im running standard leaves front and rear. Currently toying with the idea of removing the load leaves and adding coils to compensate for the curb height, failing that ive also been told of using one coil mounted in the centre of the rear differential to retain height and then removing 2 leaves for added flex


Are you running a track/torque bar??

My standard rears wrap like mothers with the four springs in the pack.

Scary to think what it'd be like with 2
yeshemesh
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Post by Guy »

I run after market 5 leaf units .. they get pretzeled a bit .. hmm a lot as well .. need something to take care of spring wrap big time ...
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by purefmx »

bigsteve wrote:
purefmx wrote:atm- im running standard leaves front and rear. Currently toying with the idea of removing the load leaves and adding coils to compensate for the curb height, failing that ive also been told of using one coil mounted in the centre of the rear differential to retain height and then removing 2 leaves for added flex


Are you running a track/torque bar??

My standard rears wrap like mothers with the four springs in the pack.

Scary to think what it'd be like with 2


nope all std :D
1985 LWB Suzuki Sierra, Lock-Rite Rear, SPOA, 2" Body Lift, Climax shackles, Rancho's,
Series 1 Rockhoppers, 31x11.5 MT'S, "To return from the dead very sooooon!"
[url]http://www.cyberdesigns.tk[/url]
[url]http://www.purefmx.tk[/url]
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

my four leaf pack didnt rap that bad with no overload :?

but now ive got a track bar anway :D
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Posts: 3076
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 7:09 am
Location: web wheelin' from sydney

Post by stumped »

i just bought an 87 zook, and am looking to do some mild lift and other things to it. OME springs seem to get a big rap from everyone, so i'm considering getting a set of them.

if i buy 2" lift springs and decide i wanna put in some body lift and run 31s later, am i likely to have any issues with the springs? i think i saw someone say that you need to take these things into consideration when ya buy springs....??
Posts: 6229
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 10:37 am
Location: melbourne victoria australia

Post by christover1 »

stumped wrote:i just bought an 87 zook, and am looking to do some mild lift and other things to it. OME springs seem to get a big rap from everyone, so i'm considering getting a set of them.

if i buy 2" lift springs and decide i wanna put in some body lift and run 31s later, am i likely to have any issues with the springs? i think i saw someone say that you need to take these things into consideration when ya buy springs....??


I been using OME for 7 years, with a 50mm body lift and 30" tyres. never a problem, till now. Bent a rear spring, but they been to hell and back, I am happy with them. christover.
4WD SUZUKI CLUB VICTORIA
http://www.vic.suzuki4wd.com/forum/
Posts: 3269
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 1:11 pm
Location: melting gears

Post by greg »

stumped wrote:i just bought an 87 zook, and am looking to do some mild lift and other things to it. OME springs seem to get a big rap from everyone, so i'm considering getting a set of them.

if i buy 2" lift springs and decide i wanna put in some body lift and run 31s later, am i likely to have any issues with the springs? i think i saw someone say that you need to take these things into consideration when ya buy springs....??


OME springs are great - so long as you are staying spring under - in a spring over application i gather they are too soft and will suffer from axel wrap.

You will be able to run 31's without the spring lift and just a body lift if you want.

The other issues that you have to consider is the offset of the rims and the width of the tyre - these will all dictate if you are going to be hitting the springs and body with your tyres at full lock and full stuff.
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
Posts: 3076
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 7:09 am
Location: web wheelin' from sydney

Post by stumped »

am planning on staying spua for ease of rego/insurance etc...
springs need doing, so i figured i may as well throw some lift under it while i'm there.

any opinions as to pro/cons of 2" spring lift running 28s or so, compared to 2" body lift with 31s? it seems that diff ratios need to be changed if ya make the move to 31s?
Posts: 3269
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 1:11 pm
Location: melting gears

Post by greg »

stumped wrote:am planning on staying spua for ease of rego/insurance etc...
springs need doing, so i figured i may as well throw some lift under it while i'm there.

any opinions as to pro/cons of 2" spring lift running 28s or so, compared to 2" body lift with 31s? it seems that diff ratios need to be changed if ya make the move to 31s?


It's easier to just put rockhopper (reduction) gears in your transfer case - this will have a greater affect on gearing than changing your diff gears will and make everything far more useable - especially offroad.

Running the springs, 28's and no body lift is not a problem - you will get the "nicer" ride, more travel and greater offroad performance from it, you just won't be able to fit big tyres - that's all.

where are you located stumped? it may be worth while going along to your local suzuki club (in various states) to see what the members there are running on their cars... that'll give you a good idea about what you may / may not want to have.

One piece of advice, if you are definately getting a rockhopper, don't waste money on a small tyre (like a 28), go straight to a 31 if you can afford it (if not, keep saving)... I don't think you will regret it.
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
Posts: 3076
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 7:09 am
Location: web wheelin' from sydney

Post by stumped »

live in newcastle, nsw... will have to see if theres a club around. only had the zook 2 days and i'm loving it already

i think i'll go with the spring lift for now, and save up for body, rockhopper, and 31s... and put em in in one go. usta own a rocky (love the 2.8TD), and ran rancho 9x's... very nice shocks. haven't noticed a preference for shocks on here, anyone got an opinion as to what's good and what's not (to go with OME 2" springs)
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

i use rancho 9000x and love em :D

btw im pretty close to newcastle if ya eva wana check my rig out :)
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 1:37 pm
Location: New Zealand home of the warriors

Post by Luigi Malone »

stumped wrote:live in newcastle, nsw... will have to see if theres a club around. only had the zook 2 days and i'm loving it already

i think i'll go with the spring lift for now, and save up for body, rockhopper, and 31s... and put em in in one go. usta own a rocky (love the 2.8TD), and ran rancho 9x's... very nice shocks. haven't noticed a preference for shocks on here, anyone got an opinion as to what's good and what's not (to go with OME 2" springs)


I found the OME shocks actually limited wheel travel.
I use Ranco 5000s in rear and Monroes up front.
But if all goes well for me I intend to go Fox in front. I will need to extend my shock towers more first. They are extended 2" already.
Look ahead at what you might want before you purchase shocks etc.
LM
It's better to have LIVED for a day than to have EXISTED for a hundred years.
Posts: 3269
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 1:11 pm
Location: melting gears

Post by greg »

redzook wrote:btw im pretty close to newcastle if ya eva wana check my rig out :)


I don't think he would - the pics are bad enough :D
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
Posts: 3269
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 1:11 pm
Location: melting gears

Post by greg »

Luigi Malone wrote:Look ahead at what you might want before you purchase shocks etc.
LM


Have to agree with that.

I've got rancho's too - 9112x's in the front, 9012x's in the rear... love them - always run them on 1 for the softest ride possible :cool:
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
Posts: 3269
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 1:11 pm
Location: melting gears

Post by greg »

stumped wrote:live in newcastle, nsw...


Sorry. :cry:

stumped wrote:will have to see if theres a club around. only had the zook 2 days and i'm loving it already


new castle clubs thread:

http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/PHP_Modul ... =newcastle


stumped wrote:i think i'll go with the spring lift for now, and save up for body, rockhopper, and 31s... and put em in in one go. usta own a rocky (love the 2.8TD), and ran rancho 9x's... very nice shocks. haven't noticed a preference for shocks on here, anyone got an opinion as to what's good and what's not (to go with OME 2" springs)


As per what Luigi has written - OME shocks are probably too stiff and will limit the max travel you can get out of the springs (particularly if you remove leaves from the springs)... It all depends on how big you want to go, and how much you want to spend.
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

greg wrote:
Have to agree with that.

I've got rancho's too - 9112x's in the front, 9012x's in the rear... love them - always run them on 1 for the softest ride possible :cool:
why so long of shocks? im not baggin ya
but im almost certain u wouldnt go close to using it all :?:
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Posts: 3269
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 1:11 pm
Location: melting gears

Post by greg »

redzook wrote:
greg wrote:
Have to agree with that.

I've got rancho's too - 9112x's in the front, 9012x's in the rear... love them - always run them on 1 for the softest ride possible :cool:
why so long of shocks? im not baggin ya
but im almost certain u wouldnt go close to using it all :?:


Those shocks were picked because of the valving on them (9012's are very soft, 9112's are a bit harder, but all i could get at the time), and because of the length... You're right, i don't use all of it, but getting something so long means that every time i tweak the springs to get another inch or two, i don't have to get new shocks...

I'm not really sure how much travel of the shocks i use.

p.s. the 9012's sure are long though - they are mounted 5 inches above floor height in the back (i.e. i have holes cut through the floor :cool: )
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
Posts: 3076
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 7:09 am
Location: web wheelin' from sydney

Post by stumped »

just looked at rockhopper for 1.3 zook... think is series 1 and 3....

is there any difference between the two, other than the different reduction and price? is one stronger than the other, or puts less stress on the vehicle? would you need to go to the series 3 for 31s, or is it not worth the extra $$?
Posts: 3269
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 1:11 pm
Location: melting gears

Post by greg »

Series 1:

http://www.bigballsoffroad.com/prod95.htm


Series 3:

http://www.bigballsoffroad.com/prod4.htm


In answer to your question, you could get away with a series 1, but everyone i know of (including myself) that has had a series 1 has since increased their tyre size and had to buy a series 3 because of it... so it's cheaper to get the series 3 in the long run :cool:
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 11:28 am

Post by stockman »

stumped wrote:i just bought an 87 zook, and am looking to do some mild lift and other things to it. OME springs seem to get a big rap from everyone, so i'm considering getting a set of them.

if i buy 2" lift springs and decide i wanna put in some body lift and run 31s later, am i likely to have any issues with the springs? i think i saw someone say that you need to take these things into consideration when ya buy springs....??



will 30'' tyres fit with just 2'' spring lift with 8'' rims but deep dish on outside if u know what i mean.. to stop fouling spring packs at hard lock??
Posts: 3269
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 1:11 pm
Location: melting gears

Post by greg »

stockman wrote:will 30'' tyres fit with just 2'' spring lift with 8'' rims but deep dish on outside if u know what i mean.. to stop fouling spring packs at hard lock??


30's on 8's? How wide are these tyres?

The (theoretically golden) rule is that the biggest tyre you can fit on an unchanged sierra is a 235x75x15 - which is about 28.5 - 29 inches in diameter.

This means that anything bigger than that, will start hitting the flares / firewall / front bumper mounts etc...

Using lifted spring (assuming they are flexable), will affect ride height, but should not affect how far up into the guards the tyre will go when under full compression - this means that unless you increase your bump stops, cut your guards, lift the body, or spring over the car, the biggest tyre you can fit without rubbing under the guards is still going to be limited to 28.5 inches.

This 28.5 can easily be increased to around 30" but cutting off the front bumper mount, and flattening out the seams inside the wheel well. Both these steps will allow you to fit a bigger tyre without touching and getting cut up by the seams when at full compression.

Hope that made sense.

Bascially, if you have deep dished (backspacing at a minimum) rims, you should not hit the springs at full lock, but you are more likely to hit the firewall and headlight end of the wheel well as the scrub radius of the tyre is bigger as you decrease the backspacing.

However, i still think that you will need to do some modifications to the body to make it all fit in there nice and neat.
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 11:28 am

Post by stockman »

greg wrote:
stockman wrote:will 30'' tyres fit with just 2'' spring lift with 8'' rims but deep dish on outside if u know what i mean.. to stop fouling spring packs at hard lock??


30's on 8's? How wide are these tyres?

The (theoretically golden) rule is that the biggest tyre you can fit on an unchanged sierra is a 235x75x15 - which is about 28.5 - 29 inches in diameter.

This means that anything bigger than that, will start hitting the flares / firewall / front bumper mounts etc...

Using lifted spring (assuming they are flexable), will affect ride height, but should not affect how far up into the guards the tyre will go when under full compression - this means that unless you increase your bump stops, cut your guards, lift the body, or spring over the car, the biggest tyre you can fit without rubbing under the guards is still going to be limited to 28.5 inches.

This 28.5 can easily be increased to around 30" but cutting off the front bumper mount, and flattening out the seams inside the wheel well. Both these steps will allow you to fit a bigger tyre without touching and getting cut up by the seams when at full compression.

Hope that made sense.

Bascially, if you have deep dished (backspacing at a minimum) rims, you should not hit the springs at full lock, but you are more likely to hit the firewall and headlight end of the wheel well as the scrub radius of the tyre is bigger as you decrease the backspacing.

However, i still think that you will need to do some modifications to the body to make it all fit in there nice and neat.


oh right greg sort of makes sense , yeah ill think ill just leave her and go calmini 5''lift or spring over do u know any companys that sell a weld on spiringover kit in Australia..
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests