usta own a rocky that i had to take these lovely shocks off after i parked it on its side...
just bought an 87 sierra, am looking to put 2" OME springs under it... was wondering if it's going to be possible to use my RS99117s on it? need to convert from pin to eye at the top; does anyone have any ideas 'bout length and that kinda thing? would be nice to be able to use em, make the suspension setup cheaper...
any ideas?
Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
rancho RS99117s for a sierra?
rancho RS99117s for a sierra?
___,,,,_('o')_,,,,____
part of the newy conspiracy...
part of the newy conspiracy...
they are 12.250 compressed and 18.625 extended 6.375 travel
pretty short they may work spua as i dont know how far the shock mounts are apart?
ive got some 9008 that i will be gettin rid of soon eye to eye might be a bit long for you though?
pretty short they may work spua as i dont know how far the shock mounts are apart?
ive got some 9008 that i will be gettin rid of soon eye to eye might be a bit long for you though?
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
that sounds 'bout right, lol... pretty sure that is it actually. planning on staying spua unless someone convinces me otherwise 
what're the measurements of the 9008s? i guess compressed is the main thing... wouldn't wanna limit the springs too much. wouldn't mind checking out ur rig sometime before i start doing mods to mine if ur willing. gimme a week or so to finish uni exams and stuff, and maybe we can work something out?
what're the measurements of the 9008s? i guess compressed is the main thing... wouldn't wanna limit the springs too much. wouldn't mind checking out ur rig sometime before i start doing mods to mine if ur willing. gimme a week or so to finish uni exams and stuff, and maybe we can work something out?
___,,,,_('o')_,,,,____
part of the newy conspiracy...
part of the newy conspiracy...
just wanna to see what NOT to do 
do you have any problems with cops or rego or insurance with spoa? are you able to insure it at all? did you do the conversion, or get it done... and how much $$? how does it go with the raised cog, any issues with it being easier to tip?
20 questions, lol
do you have any problems with cops or rego or insurance with spoa? are you able to insure it at all? did you do the conversion, or get it done... and how much $$? how does it go with the raised cog, any issues with it being easier to tip?
20 questions, lol
___,,,,_('o')_,,,,____
part of the newy conspiracy...
part of the newy conspiracy...
Don't forget about the valving on the shocks guys... I see you are talking about eyes / pins / lenghts - but you also need to work out if the shocks are going to be hard / soft enough for your car...
sadly i don't know of anywhere that this information is listed about ranchos
sadly i don't know of anywhere that this information is listed about ranchos
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
stumped wrote:ahh... thanks greg...
no idea if that will cause problems. the rocky was 1.6t, the zook plate says it's about 1.3t (is that right? i thought they were lighter...), so maybe the difference won't call a problem...??
I think a hardtop 1.3L sierra is about nine hundred and something kilos...
The application guide for ranchos is a bit confusing though - the shocks i am running are designed for using as duel shocks on the back of toyota pickup trucks or bronco's or something...
Then again, my swampers are meant to be used as duelies too
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
stumped wrote:yeah, i thought it was sposed to be less than a tonne...
dual shocks eh? does tyre choice make any difference to shock choice at all? (forgive the stupid questions, lol)
I guess the weight of a tyre pulling down on the spring and shock could have some affect about what shock valving should be, but i don't really think so.
However, tyre choice does affect your shock choice in a slighty more indirect manor - for example, if you want to run tyres beyond a certain size, you will need to do some changes to the positioning of your axels under your car (i.e. move the front axel forward) to allow bigger tyres clearance around the firewall etc... This would affect your suspension setup, and that would affect what shock you would want to use.
make sense?
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
for me I am using shocks designed for an 80 series crusier in the rear of mine .. but at the angle they are mounted yo uget greater mechanical advantage over them, The rear of my hardtop Zuk is soft enough for me (I also carry alot of crap in mine) and the front I use gabriel "Red Ryder" shocks for the rear of a HQ or VL commodore or something like that. as they are soft and have a 11 or 12 inch stroke .. and they cost $40 
Really need something a bit stiffer IMHO. But was experimenting with setups at the time..
Really need something a bit stiffer IMHO. But was experimenting with setups at the time..
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
.. guess you can see where the screen name comes from now .. 
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests