Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Sierra Axle Forward (No PAS or high steer)

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Post Reply
Posts: 918
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:46 am
Location: Western Brisbane

Sierra Axle Forward (No PAS or high steer)

Post by Highway-Star »

OK, moving the axle forward has been covered plenty of times, however every case I have searched and found is on a vehicle with power steer, or with a SPOA running high steer.

What I want to know is for a 100% stock steering arrangement, how far can the front axle be taken forward? By crawling under my car I can see about 10mm of gap between the ball joint on the drag link and the tie rod. ATM the car has sagged standard suspension. So would about 8mm be the safe maximum? Prefer some comments from someone who has done it to a stockish car.

I'm looking at getting custom 2" lifted front springs made up with the axle hole in a more appropriate place, so my 31" tyres miss the hammered firewall by more than 1mm.

Also for those who try to suggest an alternate approach, just a few notes to please consider:
- My steering box cannot be moved forward due to my crazy front bar mounts.
- My firewall is already hammered.
- Not installing a PAS box, with the shorter pitman arm.
- Not doing a SPOA, and installing a high steer.
- Not interested in doing a RUF. It seems like a great mod, but excessive work for my requirements.

Thanks
Wheeling on completely wicked angles, without even looking stable.
User avatar
Dee
Posts: 2314
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Sunny Coast, QLD

Post by Dee »

want33s moved his front diff foward 40mm by redrilling perches on diff. After discussions with him I was told that he had some problems with steering rod/links hitting each other (to the point of dinting/bending them). I however have done a ruf (as have many others on this board) and I believe its moved my front diff foward *approx.* 35mm. I and others would experience the steering links "just polishing" eachother on uptravel, with no real damage done. I think youd be very safe in terms of tie rod/drag link clearances with a movement of 25-30mm.
Posts: 918
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:46 am
Location: Western Brisbane

Post by Highway-Star »

And your still running standard steering? If so can you explain why it doesn't hit, because I cannot see why It wouldn't...

I thought that ~30mm would hit and just not get past each other at all. I got under the car again, took a picture and made a proper measurement. Its ~12mm from the closest part of the drag links ball joint, to the tie rod.

Heres a picture of the steering linkages for anyone who is not sure what I'm rambling on about. This is with the steering straight ahead, which is when the two come closest to each other. This height is also approximetaly where my (yet to come) extended bumpstops will just about stop my uptravel. May go up a bit further,

Image
Wheeling on completely wicked angles, without even looking stable.
User avatar
Dee
Posts: 2314
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Sunny Coast, QLD

Post by Dee »

I've only had a quick look at mine, havent driven it with the setup yet, but try grabbing the lower link and twisting it. When people say their arms 'just touch' or 'polish' eachother I think what happens is under compression when they do make contact the pressure on the upper balljoint forces it to twist & 'slide' past, with a certain amount of wheelbase extension. With too much extension its too far for them to slide past eachother and the lower link takes the full 'hit' of the upper balljoint, casing damage/bending etc...
someone may want to confirm this however, im not 100% positive this is just what i've found from reading some RUF threads & also after having a quick look under mine.
Posts: 3940
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld

Post by want33s »

I had mine 40mm forward until I did the NT spring thing.

I have 2" raised springs and I found that the pitman arm was hitting the drag link at full compression. I fixed it by adding 2" bumpstop extensions and moving diff so it is 27mm forward instead of 40mm.

Image
You can see the slight kink! :shock:
A chassis extension for ruf will move the steering box and all forward 75mm eventually.
Posts: 918
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:46 am
Location: Western Brisbane

Post by Highway-Star »

Cheers Guys

I get the twisting bit your talking about DeeV8, can get about 17mm gap if I twist the drag link around a bit.

Want33s: Slight Kink, ouch mate, that sucks, instant toe adjustment. Thats why I want to get this right first time. So your 27mm forward with 2" bumpstops works; that sounds promising, I was sort of aiming for around the 15mm mark, and I'll be running whatever extended bumpstops my final tyre suspension setup dictates I need (hopefull estimate of 1.5").

Thanks
Wheeling on completely wicked angles, without even looking stable.
Posts: 6229
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 10:37 am
Location: melbourne victoria australia

Post by christover1 »

Mine was not ps when I moved mine forward.
I found 22mm was a happy medium, to avoid all issues I could think of.
Didn't have any probs with that.
Ps did give me more room.
I didn't need a tailshaft spacer, but have since fitted one, as my t-case was moved back a tad.

christover
4WD SUZUKI CLUB VICTORIA
http://www.vic.suzuki4wd.com/forum/
Posts: 918
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:46 am
Location: Western Brisbane

Post by Highway-Star »

Cheers Christover, I read your thread in the bible, but didn't realise it was done before your PAS.
Wheeling on completely wicked angles, without even looking stable.
Posts: 3825
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 8:42 pm
Location: in the sky , its a bird , its a plane ! No its super MOOSE !!!

Post by moose »

i moved mine forward about 30mm !!
no P/S , but do have a reverse shackle & mazda springs !!!
running 33,s , so have bent the steering arms a few times , that is the only time I have clearance issues !!

Image
(gotta love the approach angle !! :D )
MissForbyNoob wrote:
and one day i'll just become a worthless housewife.
Posts: 264
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:57 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by Rotazuk »

I went ~22mm standard suspension , no issues . Doubt I could have gone any further .

Chris
Posts: 918
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:46 am
Location: Western Brisbane

Post by Highway-Star »

Thanks Everyone.

I think 15mm is a good shot then, sounds pretty safe, under what you guys are running, and you still dont seem to be having issues for further forward than this. Plus it will look standard, no one will ever know (my cars not stock, its a 'sleeper') :lol:

Moose does have a kick arse approach angle :D !
Wheeling on completely wicked angles, without even looking stable.
Posts: 918
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:46 am
Location: Western Brisbane

Post by Highway-Star »

OK I finally installed my suspension last weekend, and moved the axle forward in the process. I opted for 18mm forward which seems to have worked out really well for clearance. I havn't had it flexed up yet to be sure that it clears, but around the yard and visual investigating seems all good.

Here is a picture of the wheel in the well, I think it looks reasonably balanced whilst still maintaining a stock like appearance. If I had PAS with the shorter pitman arm I would have went a bit further though. (31" tyres in the the photo BTW).

Image


So thanks to everyone who heped me out here :D .
Wheeling on completely wicked angles, without even looking stable.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests