Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

rear door/spare tyreshanger woes

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Post Reply
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:56 am
Location: launceston, tasmania

rear door/spare tyreshanger woes

Post by keechox@autospeed.com »

hi guys,
has anyone had problems with the rears door spare tyre hanger?

mine is slowly but surely tearing the rear door to pieces.

Has anyone made up new brackets or re-inforced it ??

seems to be very weak area

any info on what you guys have done would be greatle appreciated

cheers
there is BBQ shapes floating round the cab, we ARE under water
Posts: 3940
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld

Post by want33s »

There's heaps of info in the bible if you.....
Image
Look around before you ask or you'll get flamed. :D
Posts: 4825
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Berwick vic

Re: rear door/spare tyreshanger woes

Post by droopypete »

keechox@autospeed.com wrote:hi guys,
has anyone had problems with the rears door spare tyre hanger?

mine is slowly but surely tearing the rear door to pieces.

Has anyone made up new brackets or re-inforced it ??

seems to be very weak area

any info on what you guys have done would be greatle appreciated

cheers
I have run 33 or 34 inch tyres for about 10 years now and I have always used a "space saver" spare (same diameter, but as skinny as I can find) I have never had a flat and my rear door is as good as new (except for a bit of rock rash :) )
It is the weight that kills it, weight=leverage x bouncing = kafoockta on the rear door hinges.
I am against building a swing out tyre carrier because to make it strong enough you will be adding a lot of killograms to a vehicle that's main feature is it's light weight.
Peter.
Cable bracing is the way of the future!

v840 said "That sounds like a booty fab, hack job piece of shit no offence."
Posts: 2297
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:23 pm
Location: Melbourne-Australia

Post by MightyMouse »

What skinny spare are you using for a 34" ?
( usual disclaimers )

It seemed like a much better idea when I started it than it does now.
Posts: 4825
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Berwick vic

Post by droopypete »

MightyMouse wrote:What skinny spare are you using for a 34" ?
33x9 mud terrain pumped up to the bejesus
Cable bracing is the way of the future!

v840 said "That sounds like a booty fab, hack job piece of shit no offence."
Posts: 2297
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:23 pm
Location: Melbourne-Australia

Post by MightyMouse »

Ok- not quite as "compact" a solution as I was hoping for... may as well just run a 34x9.5 as a full size spare :)
( usual disclaimers )

It seemed like a much better idea when I started it than it does now.
Posts: 4825
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Berwick vic

Post by droopypete »

MightyMouse wrote:Ok- not quite as "compact" a solution as I was hoping for... may as well just run a 34x9.5 as a full size spare :)
its not the size, it is the weight, a 33x9.5 bfg mud on a 6" rim is heaps lighter than a 34 swamper on a bead locked rim.
Peter.
Cable bracing is the way of the future!

v840 said "That sounds like a booty fab, hack job piece of shit no offence."
Posts: 2297
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:23 pm
Location: Melbourne-Australia

Post by MightyMouse »

droopypete wrote:
MightyMouse wrote:Ok- not quite as "compact" a solution as I was hoping for... may as well just run a 34x9.5 as a full size spare :)
its not the size, it is the weight, a 33x9.5 bfg mud on a 6" rim is heaps lighter than a 34 swamper on a bead locked rim.
Peter.
Ok - still an option perhaps...... Where's the major difference the rim or the tyre ?
( usual disclaimers )

It seemed like a much better idea when I started it than it does now.
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

Both.

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 2297
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:23 pm
Location: Melbourne-Australia

Post by MightyMouse »

Oh well, as the rim already exists the gain isn't going to be as significant as could be - will just have to live with an undersize spare.
( usual disclaimers )

It seemed like a much better idea when I started it than it does now.
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:56 am
Location: launceston, tasmania

Post by keechox@autospeed.com »

want33s.... where in the bible is there any info about this?????? i looked before and still cant find anything
there is BBQ shapes floating round the cab, we ARE under water
Posts: 3940
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld

Post by want33s »

Posts: 2955
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:19 am
Location: Melton

Post by suzuki boy »

I took mine off the back door for that reason! Bloody light door with no tyre on it! Bog up the holes and put it in the back!

I'm mounting mine on th eangle and cutting out the back door around it :twisted: I'll post up when i do it should look different..... ;)

But yeah been covered heaps of times!
Built swb sierra, building a lwb sierra ute and have a dmax for family camping
Posts: 885
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:45 pm
Location: Maroochydore, sunshine coast

Re: rear door/spare tyreshanger woes

Post by spamwell »

droopypete wrote:
keechox@autospeed.com wrote:hi guys,
has anyone had problems with the rears door spare tyre hanger?

mine is slowly but surely tearing the rear door to pieces.

Has anyone made up new brackets or re-inforced it ??

seems to be very weak area

any info on what you guys have done would be greatle appreciated

cheers
I have run 33 or 34 inch tyres for about 10 years now and I have always used a "space saver" spare (same diameter, but as skinny as I can find) I have never had a flat and my rear door is as good as new (except for a bit of rock rash :) )
It is the weight that kills it, weight=leverage x bouncing = kafoockta on the rear door hinges.
I am against building a swing out tyre carrier because to make it strong enough you will be adding a lot of killograms to a vehicle that's main feature is it's light weight.
Peter.

mines strong enough and weights just a little bit more than the seats i took out the back. :D
Posts: 4825
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Berwick vic

Re: rear door/spare tyreshanger woes

Post by droopypete »

spamwell wrote:
droopypete wrote:
keechox@autospeed.com wrote:hi guys,
has anyone had problems with the rears door spare tyre hanger?

mine is slowly but surely tearing the rear door to pieces.

Has anyone made up new brackets or re-inforced it ??

seems to be very weak area

any info on what you guys have done would be greatle appreciated

cheers
I have run 33 or 34 inch tyres for about 10 years now and I have always used a "space saver" spare (same diameter, but as skinny as I can find) I have never had a flat and my rear door is as good as new (except for a bit of rock rash :) )
It is the weight that kills it, weight=leverage x bouncing = kafoockta on the rear door hinges.
I am against building a swing out tyre carrier because to make it strong enough you will be adding a lot of killograms to a vehicle that's main feature is it's light weight.
Peter.

mines strong enough and weights just a little bit more than the seats i took out the back. :D
Where do you put your swag, food, recovery gear, camping gear and spares? (let alone the kids)
Peter.
Cable bracing is the way of the future!

v840 said "That sounds like a booty fab, hack job piece of shit no offence."
Posts: 977
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 7:57 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by Gutless »

I Recently made a full tube rear bar with tube swing away, hayman reece hitch, LED's, and jerry holder and the whole contraption weighed in at 35kg.

Image
Image


IMO thats an acceptable gain in weight considering the advantages.

Peter
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by grimbo »

nice
Ransom note = demand + collage
User avatar
Dee
Posts: 2314
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Sunny Coast, QLD

Post by Dee »

VERY nice gutless :cool:

how much for another one!!!!
Posts: 977
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 7:57 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by Gutless »

Dee wrote:VERY nice gutless :cool:

how much for another one!!!!
You Have PM. :D make sure you are sitting down though :finger:
Posts: 977
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 7:57 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by Gutless »

Also made the sliders on that zook. They are stronger than Arnies and stallones lovechild :D Bolt on too :armsup:
Posts: 4825
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Berwick vic

Post by droopypete »

Yes, very good work
Cable bracing is the way of the future!

v840 said "That sounds like a booty fab, hack job piece of shit no offence."
Posts: 1213
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:25 pm
Location: SE Melbourne

Post by dank »

Gutless wrote:I Recently made a full tube rear bar with tube swing away, hayman reece hitch, LED's, and jerry holder and the whole contraption weighed in at 35kg.

Image
Image


IMO thats an acceptable gain in weight considering the advantages.

Peter
Man that zook is shiny!!!! :cool:
Work - KPD4X4.COM - KPD Industries Australian Distributor of Diesel Power Modules - Germany.
Play - dank's zook
Posts: 977
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 7:57 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by Gutless »

Yeah a mate of mine owns it. He REALLY looks after it!! Its probably the neatest zook I've ever seen :cool:
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests