Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
SWB or 100", which is best ??
Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators
SWB or 100", which is best ??
G'day all,
Is a SWB TOO short for rock crawling? is it too inclined to go end over end on hills ?
the reason I ask is I have been building a SWB Defender (currently 91" long, no spring lift, plan 2" lift so would end up been 90" long). After going to the woodpecker challenge (I want to compete in my rig) I believe a SWB is too short. The Blue GQ SWB almost went over in stage II and patrols are about 94" long (I think), so my 90" would go over for sure. I have built it with a lower centre of gravity, BUT I think it would be too short.
I know 100" is that magic number of happy medium but would it be worth it?? I would mount the motor further back (more or less push the front diff forward) and lower giving an even better centre of gravity.
Anyway I would like to hear about people who have bought SWB vehicles and mad the wheelbase longer and what length their rig is now.
Is a SWB TOO short for rock crawling? is it too inclined to go end over end on hills ?
the reason I ask is I have been building a SWB Defender (currently 91" long, no spring lift, plan 2" lift so would end up been 90" long). After going to the woodpecker challenge (I want to compete in my rig) I believe a SWB is too short. The Blue GQ SWB almost went over in stage II and patrols are about 94" long (I think), so my 90" would go over for sure. I have built it with a lower centre of gravity, BUT I think it would be too short.
I know 100" is that magic number of happy medium but would it be worth it?? I would mount the motor further back (more or less push the front diff forward) and lower giving an even better centre of gravity.
Anyway I would like to hear about people who have bought SWB vehicles and mad the wheelbase longer and what length their rig is now.
[i]DAS[/i]
MY05 4.4L V8 Range Rover Vogue
Series 2a Buggy....In the Building
MY05 4.4L V8 Range Rover Vogue
Series 2a Buggy....In the Building
Re: SWB or 100", which is best ??
DAS wrote:G'day all,
Is a SWB TOO short for rock crawling? is it too inclined to go end over end on hills ?
the reason I ask is I have been building a SWB Defender (currently 91" long, no spring lift, plan 2" lift so would end up been 90" long). After going to the woodpecker challenge (I want to compete in my rig) I believe a SWB is too short. The Blue GQ SWB almost went over in stage II and patrols are about 94" long (I think), so my 90" would go over for sure. I have built it with a lower centre of gravity, BUT I think it would be too short.
I know 100" is that magic number of happy medium but would it be worth it?? I would mount the motor further back (more or less push the front diff forward) and lower giving an even better centre of gravity.
Anyway I would like to hear about people who have bought SWB vehicles and mad the wheelbase longer and what length their rig is now.
I drove my zook off all those steps no problems at all, it is only 87 inches.
I am going to stretch mine to about 100 inches. It should climb alot better at that length.
Re: SWB or 100", which is best ??
DAS wrote:Anyway I would like to hear about people who have bought SWB vehicles and mad the wheelbase longer and what length their rig is now.
My short Maverick is at about 100" now. I haven't driven it at that length, still have to put it all back together, but it has been at about 98" for the last 12 months, much easier to drive hard than at standard length.....
Re: SWB or 100", which is best ??
mickbj42 wrote:I drove my zook off all those steps no problems at all, it is only 87 inches.
I am going to stretch mine to about 100 inches. It should climb alot better at that length.
So you feel 87" is too short ? How high is your truck and what size tyres?
Shorty 40
Mine is now 101" And it is so much more stable climbing and descending. The extra 10" or so width helps aswell
The width isn't the issue with my rig, its wide enough, just concerned with length.
[i]DAS[/i]
MY05 4.4L V8 Range Rover Vogue
Series 2a Buggy....In the Building
MY05 4.4L V8 Range Rover Vogue
Series 2a Buggy....In the Building
My Disco is at 101" (rear axle pushed back a bit), now from 100", that's a 1% increase, and the effect IS 1% on driving...
...BUT, i did drive a nice D-90 on a 100m section that my Disco had NOT problems with, where I felt the "up" and "downs" were a wee bit less stable and the front tires were not well planted on the climbs (his gearing is 4.11s, mine 4.7)...a mate in a D110 drove the section and was having clearence problems, that is when I was happy that I had the "just right" WB...
Its just like Goldilocks...not too hot, not too cold...just right!

Its just like Goldilocks...not too hot, not too cold...just right!
LR Disco truggy:
42" Iroks, ZF, dual cases & ARBs, 30 splined, Longfielded, OMEs, Optimas, M8274-50s, Rockstomper rope & Bead-L
LR D-90 TD5 ST:
33" BFT AT, tuned, caged, 1/2 top
42" Iroks, ZF, dual cases & ARBs, 30 splined, Longfielded, OMEs, Optimas, M8274-50s, Rockstomper rope & Bead-L
LR D-90 TD5 ST:
33" BFT AT, tuned, caged, 1/2 top
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests