![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
Who was selling vote's for charity? TTC organisers or someone else?
Moderator: evanstaniland
the gun wrote:Anybody got the final vote tally??? I carnt imagine that the "charity" votes would have had any effect on which competitors didnt make the final cut.
Sam
Tony, having read all of your comments, I haven't taken it any other way. You've made many positive comments in the past on TTC and comments on this thread are probably one of the first not so positive comments that I've seen from you. However, I'm not seeing sense in what you're saying about how things work with the other events on how they may take entrants. If an event only takes X amount of entrants and for most events it is first in, first taken or similar, this isn't necessarily fair is it?? At least TTC gives the opportunity to all propsective entrants to compete, this is a fundamental difference between TTC and the other comps. From there comes about one of the reasons of drawing interest to TTC. You may argue the finer points of the actual voting system but the basic system works well for TTC IMO.RUFF wrote:Please do not take this the wrong way. I think the event is great. I just think the voting system sucks.
As a competitor of more events than i care to remember, i totally agree with the need for a "qualifying" comp, a lot of vehicles AND teams need the practice/testing or at least a shakedown to blow out the cobwebs. People really want to see the best teams in the country, not the ones with the largest individual club support. ( i would rather watch Glens truck over ours - we are boring!!).Podge wrote:Tony, having read all of your comments, I haven't taken it any other way. You've made many positive comments in the past on TTC and comments on this thread are probably one of the first not so positive comments that I've seen from you. However, I'm not seeing sense in what you're saying about how things work with the other events on how they may take entrants. If an event only takes X amount of entrants and for most events it is first in, first taken or similar, this isn't necessarily fair is it?? At least TTC gives the opportunity to all propsective entrants to compete, this is a fundamental difference between TTC and the other comps. From there comes about one of the reasons of drawing interest to TTC. You may argue the finer points of the actual voting system but the basic system works well for TTC IMO.RUFF wrote:Please do not take this the wrong way. I think the event is great. I just think the voting system sucks.
You can make what you want of this information but the total number of voting slips received for TTC08 was about 1350. From that, the charitable voting slips received was about 270 or 20% of the total vote, leaving 1080 or 80% that would have come from the general populos. I'll leave it to everybody to draw their own conclusion as to whether and/or how much the charitable votes contributed to the overall outcome of the make up of the field. Just for general interest sake, there was a small number of complaints on the charitable vote aspect, however some of those names attached to the complaints did also receive votes via the system and may have come out ahead of what they expected.
Sam K, I appreciate that you provided a prospective solution. The logistics behind your suggestion are pretty full on. At what time prior to the event would you hold the "shoot out"??
Sam O, are you involved in 4WD event management or something lol. You've pointed out many things that were on my mind.
Pagie
why? i think its good that its not the same trucks each year.tom_286 wrote:Dissapointing to see Glen Dobbin didnt make the cut...![]()
my GUBanzy wrote:Dial up internet.........you'd post something and come back 2 beers later to see if it loaded.
Given that you guys didnt buy charity votes and came 30th then it would seem to me that the charity votes didnt effect the outcome of who didnt make the cut. If it turned out that the guys who didnt make the cut bought charity votes so that you had to buy votes to get a start then it would have really effected things. The charity votes probably just changed the starting order at best.the gun wrote:we had 131 votes at the time the votes became secret. No we didnt buy any votes, I spoke with my driver Pete, and we decided we wouldnt buy any as it's not in the "sprit of the competion". The west end boys were told by you know who that if a team didnt have alest 250 votes they wouldnt get a start. He had 8000 votes to sell and he sold as many as he could any way he could. Do the sums, he had more than 250 mags(3750votes). So it came down to one bloke selling entres to tuff truck. As for only 20% of the votes B---s--t.Strange Rover wrote:How many votes did you have? So did you buy any charity votes??
Sam
Glenn
Redback Mountaineers
we only had 5 votes (1 person ,1 x 2nd place vote) before we realised that $100 would ensure us a drive no matter what!! so the last 2 years entry has been cheaper but it now costs you about the same in total!!!Strange Rover wrote:Given that you guys didnt buy charity votes and came 30th then it would seem to me that the charity votes didnt effect the outcome of who didnt make the cut. If it turned out that the guys who didnt make the cut bought charity votes so that you had to buy votes to get a start then it would have really effected things. The charity votes probably just changed the starting order at best.the gun wrote:we had 131 votes at the time the votes became secret. No we didnt buy any votes, I spoke with my driver Pete, and we decided we wouldnt buy any as it's not in the "sprit of the competion". The west end boys were told by you know who that if a team didnt have alest 250 votes they wouldnt get a start. He had 8000 votes to sell and he sold as many as he could any way he could. Do the sums, he had more than 250 mags(3750votes). So it came down to one bloke selling entres to tuff truck. As for only 20% of the votes B---s--t.Strange Rover wrote:How many votes did you have? So did you buy any charity votes??
Sam
Glenn
Redback Mountaineers
I think the issue was his sales pitch saying that if you dont buy my votes then you wont get in - doesent look like it ended up like this though.
Sam
bingo!the gun wrote:and we decided we wouldnt buy any as it's not in the "sprit of the competition".
Glenn
Redback Mountaineers
I agree. Many people donate to many charities in different ways, we didn’t buy votes, not because we don’t believe in the charity, but because we don’t believe in the way it was promoted.PKiel wrote:It is a good cause yes. But....
Stella
A lot of spectators will be upset with this, many come to this one 4wd event in the calendar and they want to see the big ticket, well known trucks, they see on the dvds.j-top paj wrote:why? i think its good that its not the same trucks each year.
Unless we know for sure that we will be competing then No we won't be up there.PKiel wrote:You are still taking your vehicle though???? The 4 of you are reserves, so we will get to see you all in action, as aways someone will have problems an will not be able to compete.
I have a lot of respect for everyone involved, competitors and organisers, you are all great people.
So....... Lets get down and dirty and get ready for a Bloody Great Tuff Truck 2008.....
Stella
OVERKILL ENG wrote:Anyway enough shit talk. Glenn and I have only ourselves to blame for not getting in. Was good to see some of the other competitiors views on the voting system wether the organisers of TTC take any notice or not is upto them.
Goodluck to all the competitors that did get in and hope you all have a good weekend and you trucks hold together.
SAM
Unless we know for sure that we will be competing then No we won't be up there.
. Yeh I am pretty sure Top Truck is run that way! Seems to work for them but hey, in the end some people just ain't lucky on the day and don't get in! Same as a lot won't be lucky on the day and they will break their trucks! You take it as it comes I suppose! I was hopeing to hv my truck running in it this year but somehow I knew (my laziness) it wouldn't be ready! Goodluck to all that got in though!RUFF wrote:I beleive Top Truck in the US is run this way. But im fairly sure voting is from Subscribers only and they can only vote once each.Nev wrote: I don't know of any other comps that run this way.
first i have heard of itprontozuk wrote:Some of you might know me as the “Fat Controller with Glass”
my GUBanzy wrote:Dial up internet.........you'd post something and come back 2 beers later to see if it loaded.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 3 guests