Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Sierra replacement fuel tank

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Post Reply
Posts: 4792
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 9:05 pm
Location: Watching out for stray buses

Sierra replacement fuel tank

Post by Brendan-s »

Yes I searched.

Any common fuel tanks out there that people replace stock Sierra tanks with? Apart from new aftermarket ones I mean. Mine only holds about 30L total from all the dents and instead of a straight replacement I'd love to get something that'll hold more, on the cheap.

It's for an 88 WT
User avatar
NIK
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:13 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by NIK »

There was a thread awhile back cant remember if it was a topic within another thread though.
I think one of the vit tanks 50L??
Nik
Posts: 5062
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:06 pm
Location: queensland

Post by ofr57 »

i know the carry van will bolt up but its the same size only thing it will do is lift it 2 inchs
[color=green]Vote Earth[/color]
Posts: 3940
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld

Post by want33s »

Here are pics of a Carry tank. Same 40l.. Same fittings.. Sender is even compatible with Sierra but....
WILL NOT BOLT IN to a Sierra. Not a SWB anyway.. maybe a factory ute.??
Image
Image
Posts: 677
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 7:22 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by foolsp33d »

why wont it bolt in?? i was under the impression they were an EASY swap for a bit of tank height... is it possible it wont fit a WT but WILL fit a NT!??
[quote="-Nemesis-"][quote="bj on roids"]whens the aussie one start?[/quote]

A few episodes before they can it? :lol:[/quote]
Posts: 1889
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by just cruizin' »

Nt and WT are the same.
;)
Posts: 677
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 7:22 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by foolsp33d »

mounting wise you mean!?? as my NT has a drain plug and my WT dont!! but my NT also has dents and my WT dont!- I have differences :lol:
[quote="-Nemesis-"][quote="bj on roids"]whens the aussie one start?[/quote]

A few episodes before they can it? :lol:[/quote]
Posts: 3940
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld

Post by want33s »

foolsp33d wrote:why wont it bolt in?? i was under the impression they were an EASY swap for a bit of tank height... is it possible it wont fit a WT but WILL fit a NT!??
Carry tank is about 100mm shallower than Sierra but at least 300mm wider. Half the depth but twice the width/length.
It definately will not bolt up to Sierra mounts. :cry:
NT & WT are the same tank except for drain and one return/vent pipe.
I don't have the carry tank here so can't give exact measurements but will be picking one up one the weekend so will post up dimensions then.
Posts: 5714
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2002 3:55 pm
Location: Perth WA.

Post by nicbeer »

ever looked at sierra mounts. they suck for fitting another tank easy in. all mountings on different plains.

I am looking at a long ranger one for mine
[url=http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/viewtopic.php?p=930942#930942&highlight=]Zook[/url]
U SUK Zook Built and Sold.
New rig is 97 80 DX. 2" list 33s
Posts: 5226
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 2:03 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Squik »

If you have a bodylift, there's a bloke in Granville Sydney (name escapes me but Liam from BBM knows) that splits your tank horizontally then welds in a belt/collar... turns a 40L into a 50L...
DRS smells like a cat-food milkshake... and wet socks... and gorgonzola cheese... all whizzed up in a blender
Posts: 343
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: Mt Gambier SA

Post by -ZukChiK- »

A Carry tank requires relocation of mounts, plus you have to re-route your exhaust since this tank is wider. I had considered the carry option, and a custom built option for my body lift, but have stuck to my original & have had the mounts redone. I think you can buy long range tanks that fit standard mount somewhere in Oz... but I cant 'remember!
[url=http://www.oceanculture.com]Ocean Culture Sandboards & Gear[/url]
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Perth, WA

Post by alien »

wasnt there an aftermarket tank that was clear plastic of sorts, and larger? i'd choose that over a long ranger tank - being SPOA and having a lot of clearance means i can afford the tank to drop a tiny bit.
The worst thing about censorship is ███████.
Posts: 5062
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:06 pm
Location: queensland

Post by ofr57 »

want33s wrote:Here are pics of a Carry tank. Same 40l.. Same fittings.. Sender is even compatible with Sierra but....
WILL NOT BOLT IN to a Sierra. Not a SWB anyway.. maybe a factory ute.??
Image
Image
sorry my mistake
[color=green]Vote Earth[/color]
Posts: 5062
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:06 pm
Location: queensland

Post by ofr57 »

alien wrote:wasnt there an aftermarket tank that was clear plastic of sorts, and larger? i'd choose that over a long ranger tank - being SPOA and having a lot of clearance means i can afford the tank to drop a tiny bit.
http://www.lowrangeoffroad.com/samengine.htm

no clearance lost :?
[color=green]Vote Earth[/color]
Posts: 4792
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 9:05 pm
Location: Watching out for stray buses

Post by Brendan-s »

That Petroworks one looks the biz, but then again so does the Long Ranger 70L one, and they're both probably out of my budget. As is custom making a tank.

Anyone got a link to that original thread? Couldn't find it when I searched.

Looks like I'm back to carrying a couple of jerry cans...
User avatar
NIK
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:13 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by NIK »

All I remember is that it was mentioned the clint aka bogoor had a 2nd tank possibly vit in front of the stock one but that would probly only work with spoa.
Nik
Posts: 1183
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 5:05 pm
Location: Tewantin

Post by flyinwall »

if you have a lwb tray back with a body lift you can put a hilux tank in there like i did (about 70 lt instead of 40lt)

Image
R.I.P. Darryl "DAZZA" Mutch 02/08/1978 - 26/08/2012 aged 34 years ... You will be missed my little brother.

http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=39190&start=150
Posts: 242
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:27 am
Location: Perth, WA

Post by croatian4x4 »

I emailed long ranger tanks to see if they made a bigger aftermarket fuel tank that would suit my 2" body lifted WT Zook without ruining departure angle.... ie: utilise the extra 2" of height....

They said they offer a tank that olds approximatley 90L which is manufactured for the 2" body lifted zooks and will not cause the zook to lose any departure angle.... $910inc everything needed...

What you fellas think of that?? I know its expensive...but mmmm 90L.... lol
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 8:31 pm
Location: Victoria

Post by jono_785 »

seems like a whole lot of useless weight to me
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Perth, WA

Post by alien »

i reckon! if i had a choice on ideal tank size it'd be 55L... get at least 500k's before refilling, theres not many trips where you can drive 500k's without stopping for a loo break or food =)
The worst thing about censorship is ███████.
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:03 pm
Location: brisbane

Post by chazza »

does any one have the Petroworks tanks? they seem a good bang for the buck with currency these days.
Posts: 5714
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2002 3:55 pm
Location: Perth WA.

Post by nicbeer »

I am going to be grabbing a 75L long ranger one soon. hopefully get more than 250k range then.

They will mod a smaller tank(75L) to suit a BL about 100 extra for it.

Mines going to be ARB staff price so i bit less than that cost posted up.
[url=http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/viewtopic.php?p=930942#930942&highlight=]Zook[/url]
U SUK Zook Built and Sold.
New rig is 97 80 DX. 2" list 33s
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Perth, WA

Post by alien »

why 75L nic? will they shift it over the wheels more to reduce the weight behind the leaves?
The worst thing about censorship is ███████.
Posts: 5714
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2002 3:55 pm
Location: Perth WA.

Post by nicbeer »

90L maybe but 75L is enough i think. mines only 30-40 at moment.

they will shift the balance point above to it takes in the BL space.

cant really get it forward on the leaves as the diff is there and the diff needs to go up there :)

on yours maybe it may work but mine wont be that high.
[url=http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/viewtopic.php?p=930942#930942&highlight=]Zook[/url]
U SUK Zook Built and Sold.
New rig is 97 80 DX. 2" list 33s
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Perth, WA

Post by alien »

ah yeh... my diff is 1" backwards too so that also helps. But the difference moving the front forward 6" makes to handling is awesome... it'd suck to have the rear do the reverse of that by hanging the weight out more.
The worst thing about censorship is ███████.
Posts: 912
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 6:29 pm
Location: {Sydney, Australia or Rio, Brazil Ride: Sierra JXi}

Post by Santos »

wouldn't a heavier tank at the rear balance the weight of the front engine? Make it a little more friendly on the road cornering with the weight distribution blah blah?
-[b]Santos[/b][img]http://www.teamswift.net/images/smilies/icon_furious.gif[/img]
Suzuki, Jeep & Toyota Soft tops with welded seams for SALE (PM me)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests