Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Nissan Patrol, Petrol 4.5 thinking of Gas Conversion?

Tech Talk for Nissan owners.

Moderators: toaddog, V8Patrol

Post Reply
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:38 pm
Location: Gold Coast Queensland

Nissan Patrol, Petrol 4.5 thinking of Gas Conversion?

Post by Nissan068 »

I have Nissan Patrol 4.5 Petrol. Now have to do alot of klms for work so I am thining of going gas. Has anyone had one done or have any feedback? Thanks
Posts: 1258
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 7:49 pm
Location: Mornington/ Victoria

Post by PGS 4WD »

Don't let them fit an Impco 200 A, it's a neat fit so some installers do but its way to small. A 425 works well on them with minimal HP lost. Of course if you want to spend more there is always vapour injection. Steer clear of complex converter simple mixer setups as they tend to be less reliable and are more restrictive.


Joel
-Pre trip inspections/ servicing
-Suspension/ custom modifications
-4wd Dyno & tuning
-Qualified mechanics
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 6:03 pm
Location: Victoria

Post by TEAMRPM »

PGS 4WD wrote:Don't let them fit an Impco 200 A, it's a neat fit so some installers do but its way to small. A 425 works well on them with minimal HP lost. Of course if you want to spend more there is always vapour injection. Steer clear of complex converter simple mixer setups as they tend to be less reliable and are more restrictive.


Joel


I agree totally, SVI is the only way to go for me, it is more expensive but if you were looking to keep the vehicle long term i think its worth spending more intitially. SVI (Sequential vapour injection) will cost in most cases 40% more than a complex setup. results have been proven very effective in regards to SVI. Complex does do the job on a budget but is unrelaible and harder to keep in tune. it has been dyno proven that the SVI setup has minimal power loss as apposed to complex.
:D

cheers
Last edited by TEAMRPM on Sat Jun 28, 2008 1:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 6:18 am
Location: seymour

Post by clive1100 »

I own a 4.5l patrol on gas with 200 impco convertor 270,000km on gas, no power loss at all no problems with engine just check/adjust valve clearances every 20,000km. most cost effective way to go.
User avatar
RN
A speed camera would have prevented that!
Posts: 15822
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 3:46 pm
Location: Check your six.

Post by RN »

In yesterdays Herald Sun in Vic there was a story about an Italian setup that injects gas as a liquid and as it leaves the injector it cools in the incoming air creating a denser fuel air mix . Result more power. They argued that the system creates a 4.5 litre engine out of a 4 litre.

Don't know much about the system, but the article also stated that it does not require complicated electronic controls. Would seem to piggyback the existing EFI systems.

Any one got a copy of the article. Don't know the cost or the specs, just a passing glance at the paper whilst eating dough nuts. :D
I am the Nightrider! I am the chosen one. The mighty hand of vengeance, sent down to strike the unroadworthy!
Posts: 1258
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 7:49 pm
Location: Mornington/ Victoria

Post by PGS 4WD »

clive1100 wrote:I own a 4.5l patrol on gas with 200 impco convertor 270,000km on gas, no power loss at all no problems with engine just check/adjust valve clearances every 20,000km. most cost effective way to go.
Sorry but not possible. Pull the mixer off and put a straight tube in its place, go for a drive. You loose power on both petrol and gas due to the restriction so you are often not aware of the loss. I have numerous dyno sheets, there is at least a 10% drop in peak power with a 200A. A 200A causes a power loss on a 3.0L VL and thats the correct size engine for it, but only 4-5%.
I have retrofitted 425's in place of 200A's and typically get increases of 7-9% or about 8-10 rwkW with a notivable improvement from 2000 rpm and above.

Joel

Joel
-Pre trip inspections/ servicing
-Suspension/ custom modifications
-4wd Dyno & tuning
-Qualified mechanics
Posts: 1918
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 6:03 pm
Location: Victoria

Post by Jimbo »

So is the 200A too small for a 4.2 as well?
GQII Patrol YAY!!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests