Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Pathy or Challenger Please Help!!!

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply
Posts: 1293
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:58 am
Location: Location Location

Pathy or Challenger Please Help!!!

Post by vSAHARAx »

Hey All

Well quick qn, a friend of mine is lookin at buying either a Nissan Pathfinder or a Mitsubishi Challenger.

Year models between 00 - 02 around the $16 000 mark, vehicle will mainly be used as a highway runner and camping trips up the beach, wont be used for any "extreme" 4wd'n.

What im chasing is a general oppinion / experiences, pros, cons, things to look out for and issues.

Cheers in advance Troy
GXL HDJ80 Cruiser - Lifted, Locked, 315's, 3" Zorst, Safari Intercooled, High Flowed Turbo, All the fruit. AMMS tuned coal shovel, Pushing 148rwhp... + heaps of the black sooty goodness...
User avatar
Gee
Posts: 573
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 11:20 am
Location: probably somewhere that blows...

Post by Gee »

I know the Pathfinders V6s of that era are pretty heavy on the juice- the challengers are not a great deal better- but I'm pretty sure they are at least a couple of litres better per hundred ks. Apart from that I think they are pretty similar vehicles.
Meh...
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

In magazine reviews, Pathfinder usually got higher marks for offroad performance and the V6 is more economical.

I think the Challenger has more power (for onroad) and is available with a manual - the Pathfinder is not.

Former neighbour had a Pathfinder, couldn't go larger than 30" tyres, because he couldn't fit a larger spare. I think the Challenger came stock with 30s, will take 31s without trouble.

I'm a Mitsubishi nut, so I'd take the Challenger (better the devil you know...) But I don't know that I could honestly recommend it as being better than the Pathfinder.
User avatar
Gee
Posts: 573
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 11:20 am
Location: probably somewhere that blows...

Post by Gee »

BTW- pathfinders of that era are auto only.
Meh...
User avatar
Gee
Posts: 573
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 11:20 am
Location: probably somewhere that blows...

Post by Gee »

^a minute too slow :oops:
Meh...
Posts: 2585
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 4:45 pm
Location: SYDNEY

Post by thehanko »

My old man had one of those pathys and it was an great car for what your describing - but thirsty.

we had changed over from a 4.2 turbo patrol to the pathfinder and were blown away by how well it drove on the hwy, very comfy and did what we needed off road. But considering it was a smaller vehicle, we were dissappointed by how much extra juice it used.

Ill see if i can get onto him and get his figures on real consumption.
*there's a rock, drive over it :) there's a bigger rock, drive over it :twisted: there's an even bigger rock, oops broke it :oops: Upgrade broken bit :bad-words:
Goto *
Teg
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:42 pm
Location: Port Stephens

Post by Teg »

I was in the same situation about 5 months ago and ended up buying an 02 Challenger (coil spring rear). My neighbor had a Pathfinder company car and said that it was heavy on fuel, if you do a google on both vehicles and read the feedback on both you will quickly see that the Challenger is a much preferred vehicle for everyday use and that the Pathfinder regularly gets bagged because of the fuel consumption, also the Challenger has far more cargo space with under floor storage as well. They go better in the bush than what some people will admit to and absolutely kills the sand. Try and get one with a LSD, the up market one's have them as standard and also those with two tone paint have one as well, if it has one color paint job then it most likely has a standard diff, just put your head under the rear and if it's got LSD it will have a tag on the diff. As with fuel consumption I can get 12.6L/100K mostly country driving though.
Finally (and most importantly) I like the look of the Challenger :) .
Teg
Posts: 1740
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Brisneyland

Post by RO8M »

I've seen a Challenger with 33s, but it was at the lights, so i didn't get to ask the bloke about any mods he might have done to get them in.

Mine has 30s, but i'm going to go up to 32s shortly. Spare tyre lives under the rear, with a hoist accessed from within the boot... Averaging about 12km/L; HEAPS of cargo room.
I have heavy duty raised rear leaves, and the torsions are would up a fair way. The leaves a good for the lift and carrying capacity, but rear flex lets me down sometimes.

On a recent trip to the springs, i got everywhere everyone else got (std patrol, a monster (don't laugh) prado, live axle hilux, 80 series ute, etc.

I love the challenger, everything underneath is all tucked up, and robust. Sand is easy too. On Straddie I had 5 guys plus our gear for a weekend in it, easy as.

Image

Image

Yes, this is neither car you asked about, but this is the sort of stuff i was driving comfortably in the charlie.
Image

Image
My name is Rob.

His name is Robert Paulson. His name is Robert Paulson. His name is Robert Paulson. His name is Robert Paulson.

This is legal advice.
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:39 pm
Location: Vic

Post by whitemav »

I am lead to believe that challengers are based on a early pajeo platform, so tuff but also drive well on road. And in the future if he does get more into the 4wding side should be able to lift it easy.
Main draw back for the earlier challengers was leaf springs compared to coil in the pathy. But if like others have said you go 02 they have coils anyway :)
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

whitemav wrote:I am lead to believe that challengers are based on a early pajeo platform, so tuff but also drive well on road.
When they were released the running gear was essentially Triton, which is similar to Pajero anyway. I used to go bush with a mate who had two as company cars. Travelled fine on the highway, I thought his were a little on the thirsty side (for a manual) and his second one had significant trouble with the gearbox. I think it came out twice.

Travelling on dirt roads in the leaf sprung version it felt like the rear was squirming around a lot - but when you're driving it, you don't notice any problem.
Posts: 1836
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:41 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by badger »

up untill the other week my brother had a challenger on 32 mtr's. it went alot of places and was great onroad. definatly superior to the pathfinders of the same era (know a few people who had them) i would try to get a leaf rear challenger tho as my olds had a coil one n it wallowed worse than there jeep does and couldnt tow a trailer (even efs suspension didnt fix it) didnt have any better wheel travel either.
1hd-fte 5 speed tiptronic 105 series
78 series troopy for work
gu ute play truck For sale
FTE 80 series sahara Sold

i think i have a problem
Posts: 1293
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:58 am
Location: Location Location

Post by vSAHARAx »

Cheers for the replies fellas

Im actually supprised the challengers got such a good wrap. I dont know much about either of the two. Ill admit all the challengers i have seen on fraser and moreton etc, haul arse through the soft stuff. They live in the noosa hinterland so i guess there will be alot of highway use. It will mainly be "Mums Taxi" during the week so auto licence means auto will be a must. She currently Has a 4.0L Falcon so im guessing economy will be around the same??? Which motor did the 02 challengers have? 3.0L V6 or 3.5L???

Cheers again fellas, been a great help!

Troy
GXL HDJ80 Cruiser - Lifted, Locked, 315's, 3" Zorst, Safari Intercooled, High Flowed Turbo, All the fruit. AMMS tuned coal shovel, Pushing 148rwhp... + heaps of the black sooty goodness...
Teg
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:42 pm
Location: Port Stephens

Post by Teg »

my olds had a coil one n it wallowed worse than there jeep
Mine has coils and it doesn't wallow at all, though I have HD shocks fitted, I also tow an off road van with around 140Kg tow ball weight plus all the camping gear in the back with no troubles at all even without a weight distributing hitch, goes as fast as the speed limit will allow, no wander, no swaying.

vSAHARAx, they have a 3.0Lt V6 engine.
Teg
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 4:21 pm
Location: Forest Lake

Post by shortie »

The sigle colour challenger only had open difs.

The 2 tone had limited slip.
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:01 pm
Location: PERTH WA

Post by stevet »

I had a 2000 pathfinder for 3 years , a great car . I had a rear air locker and a bit of a lift . I gave it hell , never let me down . in three years all i replaced was a brake light globe . only got rid of it because the kids were getting bigger. Would recomend it anytime.
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

Will have a 2001 Pathy forsale soon if your interested.. no offroad work
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 9:02 pm
Location: Gold Coast

Post by mitsi challenge »

mate, i was looking at the two when i bought my last 4wd. ended up with the challenger for many reasons. first, it has a stick to engage the transfer - irrelevant i know, but still.

all challengers were the 3.0 V6. mine had 32's on it without any problems. 33's required a lift and some minor trimming of the flairs to fit - nothing drastic.

as everyone has pointed out, the pathy was considered to be more thirsty than the challenger.

the challenger was built on a pajero chassis with triton running gear. easy to get some lift out of it.

for that sort of price, you should be able to get yourself into a nice LS model, which had auto, leather, woodgrain trimmings and chrome highlights outside. otherwise, it is the pov pack, which is still bloody well equipped - power mirrors, windows and steering, aircon, cd player, cruise etc. there was a special editin XS brought out that was single tone that had the LSD in the rear.

i loved my challenger, and took it many places. bloody comfortable car to drive everyday. i loved it.

ulitmately, the best advise you can get is to drive many examples of both. you will end up finding one you like better. what is good for me may not suit your needs.

if you want to know any more information, feel free to ask.

regards

Nathan
I love terra firma - the less firma the more terra :-)
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 6:27 pm
Location: Near Warragul, Victoria

Post by nickj2411 »

Troy

Try the Classified section here http://www.pcoa.org.au/forum/viewforum.php?f=13

Nick
Posts: 1379
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 8:28 pm
Location: West of Woodridge, North of Ipswich, South of Oxley, East of Wacol

Post by chikoroll_ »

challenger on 33's
sweet arse factory bullbars!

Image
Image
Image
'98 Jackaroo
Bullbar, 32" muddies, Homebrew Timber centre console, Homebrew 3" Stainless rubber bend snorkel, Homebrew Steel rear bumper, Campervan interior
Posts: 760
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:33 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by mikmav »

Another "modded" challenger pic, some slight panel work done.

Image
--
98 GU.. front locker, cheezy sliders, 33's, winch etc.. .... long shopping list.
Posts: 1379
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 8:28 pm
Location: West of Woodridge, North of Ipswich, South of Oxley, East of Wacol

Post by chikoroll_ »

lol circle work or just plain stupidity?
'98 Jackaroo
Bullbar, 32" muddies, Homebrew Timber centre console, Homebrew 3" Stainless rubber bend snorkel, Homebrew Steel rear bumper, Campervan interior
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

chikoroll_ wrote:lol circle work or just plain stupidity?
Cornering really fast, and G forces exceeded the structural integrity of the cabin?

:lol:
Posts: 1379
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 8:28 pm
Location: West of Woodridge, North of Ipswich, South of Oxley, East of Wacol

Post by chikoroll_ »

:cry: should have got that chipped windscreen fixed, it would have protected the challenger from the G-Forces
'98 Jackaroo
Bullbar, 32" muddies, Homebrew Timber centre console, Homebrew 3" Stainless rubber bend snorkel, Homebrew Steel rear bumper, Campervan interior
Posts: 1293
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:58 am
Location: Location Location

Post by vSAHARAx »

Cheers for your replies everybody. My friends drove both the pathy and Challenger and loved the both of them. In the end they said they would buy the best example they could find at the right price. Whether it be the Pathy or Challenger, which ever they found first. They ended up with a 2003 ST Pathy and i must admit this thing is mickey mouse, its like it was detailed everyday......Its spotless!!!

So thanks again everybody, some really useful input, which actually made their decision harder as they relised they are both great vehicles :P

Cheers Troy
GXL HDJ80 Cruiser - Lifted, Locked, 315's, 3" Zorst, Safari Intercooled, High Flowed Turbo, All the fruit. AMMS tuned coal shovel, Pushing 148rwhp... + heaps of the black sooty goodness...
Posts: 760
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:33 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by mikmav »

chikoroll_ wrote:lol circle work or just plain stupidity?
Saw it at stockton 2 weeks ago.. apparently rolled 4 times :shock:

1 of the passengers was a little worse for ware, didnt hear how they went, hopefully came out ok. Westpac chopper took all 5 passengers away though I heard.
--
98 GU.. front locker, cheezy sliders, 33's, winch etc.. .... long shopping list.
Posts: 1740
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Brisneyland

Post by RO8M »

My name is Rob.

His name is Robert Paulson. His name is Robert Paulson. His name is Robert Paulson. His name is Robert Paulson.

This is legal advice.
Posts: 722
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 7:40 pm
Location: QLD

Post by zagan »

A guy I know has a pathfinder 2000 to 2002 (don't know which year)

Took it up to weipia about 2 months ago with a camper trailer, said it handled everything quite fine, month and a half trip all up.

Know another guy with the Challenger as well, he doesn't takle it anywhere 4wding but saying it goes alright as well.

Seems more like a coin toss up as to which one would be better.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests