Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

2.4 Hilux Q's (1984, LN65?)

Tech Talk for Cruiser owners.

Moderators: toaddog, Elmo, DUDELUX

Post Reply
Posts: 8556
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:34 pm
Location: Sydney

2.4 Hilux Q's (1984, LN65?)

Post by RockyF75 »

Sick of the rocky, just spotted a 2.4 Lux Dual Cab for sale might have a look at it this arvo.

Biggest question I have at this stage is economy? Any owners care to share what they use in L/100k?

And how gutless are they? It'll be step down from the 2.8TD I drive now :cry: But I'm sick of unreliability. Which brings me to my next question, how reliable are they?

I know there's only limited info to go off, I'll try and post up some more info like year and amount of k's soon.
Last edited by RockyF75 on Sun Aug 10, 2008 9:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
60 + Turbo, 33"s :armsup:
Posts: 675
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:06 pm
Location: campbelltown

Post by Nat84 »

my old 84 D/Cab Deisel was geting 550 to a tank on 33's

as for reliable i drove mine from campbelltown NSW to doveton VIC and back with no probs accept for the car i reversed over :oops:
Tires are like boobs, they always look big until you have played with them for a while, then you just want a bigger set
Posts: 8556
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:34 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by RockyF75 »

Nat84 wrote:my old 84 D/Cab Deisel was geting 550 to a tank on 33's
Awesome.... but.... how big are their tanks? :lol:
60 + Turbo, 33"s :armsup:
Posts: 8556
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:34 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by RockyF75 »

Ok its a 1984 Dual cab, 2L motor. Car has 265xxx on the clock, motor is a reco tho so at this stage I don't know how many K's

He wants $1500. Has vic rego till next month. Needs new tires, and maybe a pressure can spray over some surface rust to pass from what I can see.

Any one know the size of their fuek tank so I can work out Nat's consumption?
60 + Turbo, 33"s :armsup:
Posts: 675
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:06 pm
Location: campbelltown

Post by Nat84 »

i think they are 50-55L tanks give or take
Tires are like boobs, they always look big until you have played with them for a while, then you just want a bigger set
Posts: 8556
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:34 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by RockyF75 »

sweet. 10L/100 is good enough for me.

How do they go on the highway? Manage to sit on 100 ok? I gotta drive 55k's each way to work everyday.
60 + Turbo, 33"s :armsup:
Posts: 675
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:06 pm
Location: campbelltown

Post by Nat84 »

mine sat on 100-110 untill i hit a hill and if the hill was long enough i would have to go back to 3rd ....but you learn to live with it...and if you can't well 4.88 diffs is not the answer as i put them in mine and was raving at 3500+RPM in 5th just to sit on 100
Tires are like boobs, they always look big until you have played with them for a while, then you just want a bigger set
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:10 pm
Location: Kingaroy, QLD

Post by kanookie »

I get about 10-13L/100 will sit on 110 at 3000 RPM with 31's alright wouldnt push it much more tho. the tanks in them are 66L i think....reliable as long as they are serviced good and not thrashed as ive found out twice already :lol:
Posts: 8556
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:34 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by RockyF75 »

kanookie wrote:I get about 10-13L/100 will sit on 110 at 3000 RPM with 31's alright wouldnt push it much more tho. the tanks in them are 66L i think....reliable as long as they are serviced good and not thrashed as ive found out twice already :lol:
What problems have you had with it?

Undecided as to what I want really, but reliability is right up there in my needs/wants list. I know its always different between each car, especially when its so old, but Toyota's got a bit of a name with reliable cars.

The other thing I'm looking at, is an XF ute on gas. But yeah, its a ford, so luck of the draw really if its any good.
60 + Turbo, 33"s :armsup:
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:10 pm
Location: Kingaroy, QLD

Post by kanookie »

RockyF75 wrote:
kanookie wrote:I get about 10-13L/100 will sit on 110 at 3000 RPM with 31's alright wouldnt push it much more tho. the tanks in them are 66L i think....reliable as long as they are serviced good and not thrashed as ive found out twice already :lol:
What problems have you had with it?

Undecided as to what I want really, but reliability is right up there in my needs/wants list. I know its always different between each car, especially when its so old, but Toyota's got a bit of a name with reliable cars.

The other thing I'm looking at, is an XF ute on gas. But yeah, its a ford, so luck of the draw really if its any good.

First engine i got with the ute it put a valve thru one of the pistons second engine just wore out and liked to overheat alot couldnt figure it out. but it was thrashed abit. got a reco engine from a wreckers with 10,000ks on it and looking after it hasn't really let me down yet. apart from some glow problem now a real bitch to try and start at below 0 temps.

you will regret getting the XF the hilux would be alot better if you get it change filters/oil straight away and keep up oil/ filter changes at 5000ks
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests