Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Simex 35x10.5x15 ETs weight?

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply
Posts: 691
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Lebanon

Simex 35x10.5x15 ETs weight?

Post by DiscoDino »

Can anyone shed some light into the exact weight of this tire? Thanks.
LR Disco truggy:
42" Iroks, ZF, dual cases & ARBs, 30 splined, Longfielded, OMEs, Optimas, M8274-50s, Rockstomper rope & Bead-L
LR D-90 TD5 ST:
33" BFT AT, tuned, caged, 1/2 top
Posts: 691
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Lebanon

Post by DiscoDino »

Anyone? Can anyone attest to the fact that they are heavier than 30KG each unmounted?
LR Disco truggy:
42" Iroks, ZF, dual cases & ARBs, 30 splined, Longfielded, OMEs, Optimas, M8274-50s, Rockstomper rope & Bead-L
LR D-90 TD5 ST:
33" BFT AT, tuned, caged, 1/2 top
Posts: 571
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 3:56 pm
Location: New York

Post by zzzz »

I would hazard a guess around 30kg each.
But that is from memory picking them up and mounting them months and months ago.

Just contact chris hummer and ask him.
Website is called dynamic4x4 of something...
Posts: 1513
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: North East Melbourne

Post by ORSM45 »

my 35 inch MTRs on 15x8 rims are 35kgs. so roughly round there???
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Post by Guy »

35x12.5 Bias ply baja claws on 15x8's were 44Kg each
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Posts: 3054
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by hottiemonster »

ok guys i weighed them

35x10.5x15 centipedes way an exact 28kg not on a rim. that is a brand new tyre
Gq ute new built
Posts: 733
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: VIC working on my junk

Post by 308LUX »

love_mud wrote:35x12.5 Bias ply baja claws on 15x8's were 44Kg each


off subject...but i thought 35" x 12.5 baja's where only radial and the bias tyre in the 35" was x13.5 only ????
"The object of war is not to die for you country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - General George Patton
Posts: 3054
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by hottiemonster »

bias claws are
35x13.5
33x13.5
31x11.5

radials are
31x10.5,
33x12.5
35x12.5
Gq ute new built
Posts: 691
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Lebanon

Post by DiscoDino »

Thanks Hottie Monster! so...decisions:

35x10.5x15 ETs = 28kg
36x13.5x15 IROK = 30kg
36x12.5x15 SXs = 35kg

Which ones to take to RFC? :roll:
LR Disco truggy:
42" Iroks, ZF, dual cases & ARBs, 30 splined, Longfielded, OMEs, Optimas, M8274-50s, Rockstomper rope & Bead-L
LR D-90 TD5 ST:
33" BFT AT, tuned, caged, 1/2 top
Posts: 3054
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by hottiemonster »

DiscoDino wrote:Thanks Hottie Monster! so...decisions:

35x10.5x15 ETs = 28kg
36x13.5x15 IROK = 30kg
36x12.5x15 SXs = 35kg

Which ones to take to RFC? :roll:


isnt RFC only Jungle trekkers and Centipedes?
Gq ute new built
Posts: 1403
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 7:59 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by DaveS3 »

hottiemonster wrote:
DiscoDino wrote:Thanks Hottie Monster! so...decisions:

35x10.5x15 ETs = 28kg
36x13.5x15 IROK = 30kg
36x12.5x15 SXs = 35kg

Which ones to take to RFC? :roll:


isnt RFC only Jungle trekkers and Centipedes?


Didn't think so, just sponsered by simex???
Posts: 389
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 9:51 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by LOCKY »

SX's by far.

Irocs too shallow and soft.
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

DiscoDino wrote:Thanks Hottie Monster! so...decisions:

35x10.5x15 ETs = 28kg
36x13.5x15 IROK = 30kg
36x12.5x15 SXs = 35kg

Which ones to take to RFC? :roll:


Had a good look at the Iroks, they are FUCKIGN heavy! but the sidewalls are thick. The tread felt soft though. The tread is NOT very deep, I think they would be a good rock tire, the TSL would have to be the pick of the 3...
Posts: 691
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Lebanon

Post by DiscoDino »

Yeah, I was going SX until I saw the IROKs...

Now as far as shallow tread is concerned, the Interco Site states that both the IROK 36x13.5x15 and the SX 36x12.5x15 have a tread depth of 22/32

Still debating.... :?
LR Disco truggy:
42" Iroks, ZF, dual cases & ARBs, 30 splined, Longfielded, OMEs, Optimas, M8274-50s, Rockstomper rope & Bead-L
LR D-90 TD5 ST:
33" BFT AT, tuned, caged, 1/2 top
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Post by Guy »

hottiemonster wrote:bias claws are
35x13.5
33x13.5
31x11.5

radials are
31x10.5,
33x12.5
35x12.5


Not true ... I HAVE 35x12.5 bias claws says so on the sidewall of the tyre
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Posts: 3054
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by hottiemonster »

love_mud wrote:
hottiemonster wrote:bias claws are
35x13.5
33x13.5
31x11.5

radials are
31x10.5,
33x12.5
35x12.5


Not true ... I HAVE 35x12.5 bias claws says so on the sidewall of the tyre


i didnt think they came in that size, oh well, u learn something all the time.
Gq ute new built
Posts: 571
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 3:56 pm
Location: New York

Post by zzzz »

36x12.5 simex's :)
Just cut some of the centre out to make them better for the mud.
I will be cutting mine when I get tired of the standard tread pattern :)

Or go Q78's, they have the deepest tread depth of all swampers (as well as boggers).
Posts: 3054
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by hottiemonster »

zzzz wrote:Q78's, they have the deepest tread depth of all swampers (as well as boggers).


what depth are they? even deeper than the 44" bogger?
Gq ute new built
Posts: 691
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Lebanon

Post by DiscoDino »

Q78 are at 27/32" tread depth.

The 36x12.5 ETs are WAY too tough to turn..a friend has them on his nitros blown SBC in Lebanon and they do NOT turn easy...not sure the Solihul crap we are running will like that. the SXs are easier to turn...dunno why?
LR Disco truggy:
42" Iroks, ZF, dual cases & ARBs, 30 splined, Longfielded, OMEs, Optimas, M8274-50s, Rockstomper rope & Bead-L
LR D-90 TD5 ST:
33" BFT AT, tuned, caged, 1/2 top
Posts: 3054
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by hottiemonster »

DiscoDino wrote:Q78 are at 27/32" tread depth.


thats huge. someone told me it was around an inch
Gq ute new built
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

DiscoDino wrote:Q78 are at 27/32" tread depth.


fuck, 32inchs of tread.. thems big blocks on those tires....Cant imagine how big the tires themselves would be, around 60's!! :rofl:
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 7:44 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by MKPatrolGuy »

bogged wrote:
DiscoDino wrote:Q78 are at 27/32" tread depth.


*****, 32inchs of tread.. thems big blocks on those tires....Cant imagine how big the tires themselves would be, around 60's!! :rofl:


That is a fraction u goon, works out to 21.43mm Tread depth
[size=100][url=http://www.vickrawlers.com/]VicKrawlers.com[/url]
[url=http://www.drfwdc.org.au/]Dandenong Ranges 4wd Club[/url][/size]
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

MKPatrolGuy wrote:That is a fraction u goon, works out to 21.43mm Tread depth


just bored waiting for auction to end on ebay.. makes me some $$ :)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest