Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

drop shackles

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Post Reply
Posts: 810
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: vic

drop shackles

Post by ajsr »

hey all
any one done drop shackles on a spring over using zook springs ie no ruf
how did it work?
any better suggestions?
can see my beast in show zooks flex tread if it helps
cheers andrew
85 high roof 1.3, 6.5 tc, air lockers,ruf and 34 swampers. yep its an ugly pos.
Posts: 428
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 10:07 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW

Post by mnemonix »

I've got them front and rear.
And will be removing them as soon as I get the opportunity.

I believe it's just my setup, but they do nothing positive for the vehicles performance.
Any extra articulation they provide is only for show, as there is no downforce applied.

Then also make the vehicle feel unstable on sideslopes as the shackles open and close.

Also, the model I am using gives a terrible shackle angle when pinned for road use, and they're very harsh.

Tried it, didn't like it, and they'll be in the reject pile as soon as I decide which direction I'm going in suspension wise.
Posts: 2169
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:41 pm
Location: melbourne

Post by joeblow »

check out the flex thread and look at kennys lj80.
lwb 1.6efi,4sp auto,f&r airlockers,dual t/cases.custom coils.builder of ROAD LEGAL custom suzukis...and other stuff.
CAD modelling-TECH drawings-DXF preparation.
http://www.auszookers.com/index.php
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: drop shackles

Post by grimbo »

ajsr wrote:hey all
any one done drop shackles on a spring over using zook springs ie no ruf
how did it work?
any better suggestions?
can see my beast in show zooks flex tread if it helps
cheers andrew
cmon please do a search these things get discussed every couple of months. They are crap ways to get some goofy flex for the travel ramp. But some people also get good results when they actully incorpoarte them into a well thought out and well designed, complete suspension package.

Why do you think you want them?
Ransom note = demand + collage
Posts: 810
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: vic

Post by ajsr »

im not trying to be lazy grimbo im tring to get peoples toughts on them.
i was considering them to try and improve my zooks off road suspension in all areas i dont drive it on the road.
im open to any sensible thoughts
ramps dont really interest me
as I said you can see my current set up in the zook flex thread


thanks joe your mates 4by looks the goods but I see your putting coils in it
whats the reasoning there?comfort,flex,more stable??
85 high roof 1.3, 6.5 tc, air lockers,ruf and 34 swampers. yep its an ugly pos.
Posts: 2169
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:41 pm
Location: melbourne

Post by joeblow »

kens truck rides ace and is stable. those shackles were only designed to use the 50mm left in the shock at full spring flex. we are building new custom zook diffs for his rig next year that will be about another 200mm wider because we want to go to a more readilly available axle. and while we are there we thought it would be a good idea to do coils( we say that now!). should ride similar to what it does now though.
lwb 1.6efi,4sp auto,f&r airlockers,dual t/cases.custom coils.builder of ROAD LEGAL custom suzukis...and other stuff.
CAD modelling-TECH drawings-DXF preparation.
http://www.auszookers.com/index.php
Posts: 810
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: vic

Post by ajsr »

lol
yeah they always sound like good ideas at the time

is there any way i can see this truck in the flesh joe as it is now?
85 high roof 1.3, 6.5 tc, air lockers,ruf and 34 swampers. yep its an ugly pos.
Posts: 2169
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:41 pm
Location: melbourne

Post by joeblow »

doin an auszookers tech night in a couple of weeks at my joint. lots of nice zooks will be there. will pm you the details soon.
lwb 1.6efi,4sp auto,f&r airlockers,dual t/cases.custom coils.builder of ROAD LEGAL custom suzukis...and other stuff.
CAD modelling-TECH drawings-DXF preparation.
http://www.auszookers.com/index.php
Posts: 2600
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Townsville

Post by GRPABT1 »

ajsr wrote:im not trying to be lazy grimbo im tring to get peoples toughts on them.
Peoples thoughts on them have been discussed a million times, I'm with Grimbo on this one. Search "wacky shackles" if drop shackles is not showing many results.
Build Thread - http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=168546&p=1927514&hilit=GRPABT1%27s+zook#p1927514
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 9:15 pm
Location: launceston, Tasmania

Post by get it up there »

im running zook springs in the front, (although there not standard), with drop shackles. I've taken a few springs out, and opened the clamps up. Im running lux springs in the rear, with drop shackles also, and i have more articulation in the front.
Image
F&R ARB air lockers, lux diffs, 4 link coil rear, drop shackles, inboarded ranchos, stage 4 reduction gears, 35" silverstones, 9500 winch, RUF, 1.6 EFI, swimming goggles
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 9:15 pm
Location: launceston, Tasmania

Post by get it up there »

get it up there wrote:im running zook springs in the front, (although there not standard), with drop shackles. I've taken a few springs out, and opened the clamps up. Im running lux springs in the rear, with drop shackles also, and i have a bit more articulation in the front.
Image
F&R ARB air lockers, lux diffs, 4 link coil rear, drop shackles, inboarded ranchos, stage 4 reduction gears, 35" silverstones, 9500 winch, RUF, 1.6 EFI, swimming goggles
Posts: 4073
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:13 pm

Post by lump_a_charcoal »

Even though there is not much weight applied to the dropped wheel, wouldn't it give a bit more stability as opposed to lifting one wheel?
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 9:15 pm
Location: launceston, Tasmania

Post by get it up there »

hmmm, not sure why that post came up twice?!?!
F&R ARB air lockers, lux diffs, 4 link coil rear, drop shackles, inboarded ranchos, stage 4 reduction gears, 35" silverstones, 9500 winch, RUF, 1.6 EFI, swimming goggles
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

No, general consensus is they make the car more unstable.

Generally, this is because they result in "uncontrolled" travel - i.e the wheels can just flop.

Effectively, that means that even if the wheels are on the ground, the body can still flop about as the shackle can open and close. This is a big problem under power, where the car can get all floppy and unpredictable.

That's why they have the reputation for being only for posing on ramps - they don't work well in the real world once you introduce inertia and drive load.

Careful placement of bumpstops, flat springs, well placed and adequate shock valving etc can all add stability to a car with drop shackles, but really, the whole suspension needs to be built to run them- limited compression travel, stiff shocks, good control over axle wrap etc- and by that time you might as well have built the suspension with enough travel to do the job you wanted anyway.

A low, stable car with limited suspension travel will always be better to drive than a taller, floppy car with lots of loose travel.

like I say.... low is the new lift and bumpstops are the new flex :D

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: Central coast NSW

Post by zook4fun »

every thought about doing a buggy leaf set up. it wont be so floppy but will still flex.
cheer up emo kid
Posts: 810
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: vic

Post by ajsr »

zook4fun wrote:every thought about doing a buggy leaf set up. it wont be so floppy but will still flex.
whats buggy leaf?
85 high roof 1.3, 6.5 tc, air lockers,ruf and 34 swampers. yep its an ugly pos.
Posts: 4073
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:13 pm

Post by lump_a_charcoal »

like () but horizontal...
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Perth, WA

Post by alien »

search 3/4 elliptic.... basically you run half a leaf along the chassis and the eye of that leaf meets the shackle of the full length lower leaves... they work well, but hard to get right.

im suprised no one here has questioned why a SPOA zuk needs only the 50mm or so droop the missing links will give...

you could probably gain that by tweaking the bumpstops.
The worst thing about censorship is ███████.
Posts: 810
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: vic

Post by ajsr »

yeah some good ideas guys keep them coming
the drop shackles are only an idea of how to possibly inprove my zook
its really pretty good as it is but im thinking it could be better
open to all sane ideas
cheers andrew
85 high roof 1.3, 6.5 tc, air lockers,ruf and 34 swampers. yep its an ugly pos.
Posts: 4073
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:13 pm

Post by lump_a_charcoal »

alien wrote:search 3/4 elliptic.... basically you run half a leaf along the chassis and the eye of that leaf meets the shackle of the full length lower leaves... they work well, but hard to get right.

im suprised no one here has questioned why a SPOA zuk needs only the 50mm or so droop the missing links will give...

you could probably gain that by tweaking the bumpstops.
Buggy leaf is when you use a full leaf, not just half - Just like my diagram.
Posts: 810
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: vic

Post by ajsr »

anyone got a pic of this buggy leaf or 3/4 eliptical?
got me curious now
sort of going off the drop shackle idea i think
85 high roof 1.3, 6.5 tc, air lockers,ruf and 34 swampers. yep its an ugly pos.
Posts: 377
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:03 pm
Location: Perth

Post by VR Rodeo »

ajsr wrote:anyone got a pic of this buggy leaf or 3/4 eliptical?
got me curious now
sort of going off the drop shackle idea i think
http://bbs.zuwharrie.com/index.php/topic,55772.0.html
'92 Rodeo - VR V6, T700, 31's
'89 Zook - 4 inch lift, 32's, 5.14 gears, RUF, F&R Lockrights, Rear Disconnect, Falcon/Landcruiser PS
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Perth, WA

Post by alien »

do you have a build thread or some pics and a list of what you've done to it and the terrain you're driving and what you hope to achieve? perhaps thats a better start to people suggesting how you improve it?
The worst thing about censorship is ███████.
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by grimbo »

ajsr wrote:anyone got a pic of this buggy leaf or 3/4 eliptical?
got me curious now
sort of going off the drop shackle idea i think
well having a quick look in the Siera Bible thread there is this link

http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/viewtopic.php?t=43962

pays to have abit of a look through there, lots of good info.

Also as Alien said how about explaining a bit more about you, your vehicle, your terrain and what are the shortcomings of your current setup
Ransom note = demand + collage
Posts: 2600
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Townsville

Post by GRPABT1 »

I'm doing a 3/4 elliptic setup ATM, waiting on my new boss shocks to complete it. They work alot better than drop shackles and are cheaper to boot. I copied the setup in the link above with a few changes after reccomendations from the guys off here. I was only after a little more flex in the back to match the front for stability and hence I can tune my flex by moving the elliptic spring clamps. If I remove my shocks I can have so much droop the thing falls over before lifting a wheel if I desire.

these are some pics, all pinned still with shocks severely limiting travel. Still gotta move the axle back, fit new shock in front of axle layed over and some tweaks.

Image
Image
Image

Will post pics of completed setup when it's done.
Build Thread - http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=168546&p=1927514&hilit=GRPABT1%27s+zook#p1927514
Posts: 1325
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: brisbane australia..logan reserve

Post by 11_evl »

your diff needs to go back about 12" to look any good IMO. it just looks wrong and out of proportion. plus it would be soo easy to do
michael
Posts: 810
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: vic

Post by ajsr »

alien wrote:do you have a build thread or some pics and a list of what you've done to it and the terrain you're driving and what you hope to achieve? perhaps thats a better start to people suggesting how you improve it?
you can see my zook in the show flex thread

all I use the zook for is failry nasty bush work mostly mud and deep ruts

85 high roofline drover
its a spoa that had 2" raised rancho springs now flat
long ext shocks
tail shaft spacers ext brake lines
ext shackels in rear only
wide track diffs with custom super large offset rims
lockrights front and rear
32 mongrels
6.5 crawlers

dont really think it has any major drawbacks im just thinking maybe I could make it better
85 high roof 1.3, 6.5 tc, air lockers,ruf and 34 swampers. yep its an ugly pos.
Posts: 2600
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Townsville

Post by GRPABT1 »

11_evl wrote:your diff needs to go back about 12" to look any good IMO. it just looks wrong and out of proportion. plus it would be soo easy to do
It's my daily not a comp rig. And the pic at droop makes it look worse.

Here is a better pic

Image
Build Thread - http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=168546&p=1927514&hilit=GRPABT1%27s+zook#p1927514
Posts: 377
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:03 pm
Location: Perth

Post by VR Rodeo »

GRPABT1 wrote:
11_evl wrote:your diff needs to go back about 12" to look any good IMO. it just looks wrong and out of proportion. plus it would be soo easy to do
It's my daily not a comp rig. And the pic at droop makes it look worse.

Here is a better pic
I think it's got something to do with the length of the tray and wheel arch thats makes it look out of proportion, it looks like it's right up the front and not centred, but we are getting off topic ;)
'92 Rodeo - VR V6, T700, 31's
'89 Zook - 4 inch lift, 32's, 5.14 gears, RUF, F&R Lockrights, Rear Disconnect, Falcon/Landcruiser PS
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest