Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
shock mount mods
shock mount mods
ok iv seen the commodore/hiace shock setup but i dnt wana reduce my uptravel as i am finally sorted with this aspect. my question is.....
is it possible to cut off the old shock mount and make another 50mm higher? and has anyone done this or similar before?
is it possible to cut off the old shock mount and make another 50mm higher? and has anyone done this or similar before?
85 hi top drover, 31s, 2 inch exended shackles 2 inch bl.
88 tb42 swb mav,35 claws, 4 inch lift
88 tb42 swb mav,35 claws, 4 inch lift
Yeah mate pretty easy to do. I know some guys that have cut it off completely and replaced it with a section of shs 50x50x3mm. Cut the angle you want off the chassis, then cut and fold and reweld for pin mount at top then weld to chassis and brace. I think Built4Thrashing has used this method. Bit of work though.
Might be easier to pick up some F-truck mounts which are cheap and longer but have an eye terminal at the top rather than pin. Otherwise I'd look at Hilux, Bundy shock mounts might be long enough.
cheers.
Might be easier to pick up some F-truck mounts which are cheap and longer but have an eye terminal at the top rather than pin. Otherwise I'd look at Hilux, Bundy shock mounts might be long enough.
cheers.
[url=http://www.4h.com.au]The 4wd Shop[/url] - (03) 5977 7233
Driveline, winch/winch upgrade, Bullbar, HID, 4"/6" GU/GQ Liftkit, 60/80 Series Liftkit, Recovery, Snorkels, Air.
Driveline, winch/winch upgrade, Bullbar, HID, 4"/6" GU/GQ Liftkit, 60/80 Series Liftkit, Recovery, Snorkels, Air.
Here's the ones I've made up. You'll probably have to use 25x25x2 or close to that because of the lack of space in the wheel well (depending on tyre size, rim offset or spacers). And it'd be just as easy to weld it or make them bolt up if you don't want to weld them to your chassis.
Also after this pic was taken I've moved the mount to an even more vertical position and cut the outer sleeve off the shock because of tyre clearance issues.
More Suzuki parts going to the big Suzuki Heaven in the sky!
I have seen some botched jobs of moving the stock mount up, I'd start from scratch. The stock mount is thin, not that strong anyway (I've seen a number broken) and hard to extend without looking hacky as it's a complex shape and tapers.
You'll want to doubling plate the chassis where the mount is welded on - the chassis is only 2.5mm thick, and ideally mount to both the face and top of the chassis- as you increase the height, you'll really increase the leverage on the chassis.
Not knocking Kitika's mount, but I did a mount like this once and it broke off, although it probably has more to do with crappy FCAW welds and hasty construction.
Here's how I've done a few:
These work well (they're designed for N76 shocks and bumpstop spacing, but the length isn't the issue, it's an example of the construction) But with big tyres and reasonable backspacing, the tyres will catch he mount due to its width. These JUST clear the inner guards.
The next version I'm building currently is much taller as the shock mounts on top of the axle. They run the same shock, but angle them in more at the top so although the shock mount is higher, it's over the top of the chassis so there's lots more tyre room. Of course, it's well through the inner guard and with the top mount 11" above the chassis, we think we'll need a cross brace to take some load off the chassis. You shouldn't need to go that high.
Steve.
You'll want to doubling plate the chassis where the mount is welded on - the chassis is only 2.5mm thick, and ideally mount to both the face and top of the chassis- as you increase the height, you'll really increase the leverage on the chassis.
Not knocking Kitika's mount, but I did a mount like this once and it broke off, although it probably has more to do with crappy FCAW welds and hasty construction.
Here's how I've done a few:
These work well (they're designed for N76 shocks and bumpstop spacing, but the length isn't the issue, it's an example of the construction) But with big tyres and reasonable backspacing, the tyres will catch he mount due to its width. These JUST clear the inner guards.
The next version I'm building currently is much taller as the shock mounts on top of the axle. They run the same shock, but angle them in more at the top so although the shock mount is higher, it's over the top of the chassis so there's lots more tyre room. Of course, it's well through the inner guard and with the top mount 11" above the chassis, we think we'll need a cross brace to take some load off the chassis. You shouldn't need to go that high.
Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Excuse my ignorance Steve, but I dont see how there is going to be that greater force/leverage on the mount over stock. If the shock is the right extended length then it shouldn't pull on the mount, and if it has the right compressed length or bumpstop setup then it shouldn't push on it to any great extent, should it ? There will be 'some' twisting when the axle moves but most of that will be soaked up by the bushes wouldn't it ??Gwagensteve wrote:
You'll want to doubling plate the chassis where the mount is welded on - the chassis is only 2.5mm thick, and ideally mount to both the face and top of the chassis- as you increase the height, you'll really increase the leverage on the chassis.
Not knocking Kitika's mount, but I did a mount like this once and it broke off, although it probably has more to do with crappy FCAW welds and hasty construction.
Steve.
'92 Rodeo - VR V6, T700, 31's
'89 Zook - 4 inch lift, 32's, 5.14 gears, RUF, F&R Lockrights, Rear Disconnect, Falcon/Landcruiser PS
'89 Zook - 4 inch lift, 32's, 5.14 gears, RUF, F&R Lockrights, Rear Disconnect, Falcon/Landcruiser PS
I'd like to see pics of the beast in question once you're done.Gwagensteve wrote:
The next version I'm building currently is much taller as the shock mounts on top of the axle. They run the same shock, but angle them in more at the top so although the shock mount is higher, it's over the top of the chassis so there's lots more tyre room. Of course, it's well through the inner guard and with the top mount 11" above the chassis, we think we'll need a cross brace to take some load off the chassis. You shouldn't need to go that high.
Steve.
Build Thread - http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=168546&p=1927514&hilit=GRPABT1%27s+zook#p1927514
Have you ever tried extending or retracting a shock with youre hands? You will find you will have to apply quite a bit of force to do it. Now just imagine youre suspension compressing or extending the shock in a matter of milliseconds as the suspension moves, that is a hell of a lot of force to be exerted on the mount. Plus the longer the mount is from where it attatches to the chassis to where it attatches to the shock, the more leverage is applied.VR Rodeo wrote:Excuse my ignorance Steve, but I dont see how there is going to be that greater force/leverage on the mount over stock. If the shock is the right extended length then it shouldn't pull on the mount, and if it has the right compressed length or bumpstop setup then it shouldn't push on it to any great extent, should it ? There will be 'some' twisting when the axle moves but most of that will be soaked up by the bushes wouldn't it ??Gwagensteve wrote:
You'll want to doubling plate the chassis where the mount is welded on - the chassis is only 2.5mm thick, and ideally mount to both the face and top of the chassis- as you increase the height, you'll really increase the leverage on the chassis.
Not knocking Kitika's mount, but I did a mount like this once and it broke off, although it probably has more to do with crappy FCAW welds and hasty construction.
Steve.
To be honest without knocking, im amazed the first shock mount pictured has held up. Although i have seen with my own eyes a truck engine last a few hundred thousand kilometers without main bearing lubrication other than splash feed, so it is conceivable.
MaybeGRPABT1 wrote:I'd like to see pics of the beast in question once you're done.Gwagensteve wrote:
The next version I'm building currently is much taller as the shock mounts on top of the axle. They run the same shock, but angle them in more at the top so although the shock mount is higher, it's over the top of the chassis so there's lots more tyre room. Of course, it's well through the inner guard and with the top mount 11" above the chassis, we think we'll need a cross brace to take some load off the chassis. You shouldn't need to go that high.
Steve.
[quote="4WD Stuff"]
I haven't quoted Grimbo because nobody takes him seriously :finger: :finger: :finger: :finger: [/quote]
I haven't quoted Grimbo because nobody takes him seriously :finger: :finger: :finger: :finger: [/quote]
It's not the force the shock is putting into the mount, it's the force the mount is putting into the chassis. the taller the mount, the more leverage the mount can put into the chassis, even if the force at the shock is the same.VR Rodeo wrote: Excuse my ignorance Steve, but I dont see how there is going to be that greater force/leverage on the mount over stock. If the shock is the right extended length then it shouldn't pull on the mount, and if it has the right compressed length or bumpstop setup then it shouldn't push on it to any great extent, should it ? There will be 'some' twisting when the axle moves but most of that will be soaked up by the bushes wouldn't it ??
Hope that makes sense.
Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
I have a 10 cm lever, I apply a load of 20Kgs to the end of it (or the stock mount)
I now have a 30cm lever and i apply a load of 20Kgs to it (extended mount)
The longer lever is going to exert significantly more leverage against it's base (chassis rail) even though the load at the top end is the same.
I now have a 30cm lever and i apply a load of 20Kgs to it (extended mount)
The longer lever is going to exert significantly more leverage against it's base (chassis rail) even though the load at the top end is the same.
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
I reinforced the mounting points with some flat bar (welded onto the chassis), cause as someone said before, the chassis are thin and weak! I got this set up from low range off road
F&R ARB air lockers, lux diffs, 4 link coil rear, drop shackles, inboarded ranchos, stage 4 reduction gears, 35" silverstones, 9500 winch, RUF, 1.6 EFI, swimming goggles
Cheers guys, I understand how levers work just didn't think there would be a great deal of difference between stock and raised 3 - 4 inchesGwagensteve wrote: It's not the force the shock is putting into the mount, it's the force the mount is putting into the chassis. the taller the mount, the more leverage the mount can put into the chassis, even if the force at the shock is the same.
Hope that makes sense.
Steve.
'92 Rodeo - VR V6, T700, 31's
'89 Zook - 4 inch lift, 32's, 5.14 gears, RUF, F&R Lockrights, Rear Disconnect, Falcon/Landcruiser PS
'89 Zook - 4 inch lift, 32's, 5.14 gears, RUF, F&R Lockrights, Rear Disconnect, Falcon/Landcruiser PS
As has been said plating the chassis is esential. I have had these in for 2.5 years and after some hard work they are fine. I kept the mounts far apart on the rail to spread the load and the tube was welded heavily to the plates (which mount on two planes) on the bench, then after it cooled I then did stitch welds to the rail.
I have had to cut a hoop shape out of the inner guards to fit them but if done neat enough the hoop will fill the hole.
I have had to cut a hoop shape out of the inner guards to fit them but if done neat enough the hoop will fill the hole.
I like hyzook's mounts because they look to be quite inboarded and wouldn't foul on the tyres etc and be very strong.
I did mine the way i did because of the simplicity of design and i believe they'd be just as strong or stronger than the cheesy stock mounts. Also i wanted to whip something up fast so i could back on the road after doing a RUF
They seem to have held up pretty good to the abuse so far and hope they do for along while yet!
I did mine the way i did because of the simplicity of design and i believe they'd be just as strong or stronger than the cheesy stock mounts. Also i wanted to whip something up fast so i could back on the road after doing a RUF
They seem to have held up pretty good to the abuse so far and hope they do for along while yet!
More Suzuki parts going to the big Suzuki Heaven in the sky!
Where can I buy this lever? It sounds perfect for my car...love_mud wrote:I have a 10 cm lever, I apply a load of 20Kgs to the end of it (or the stock mount)
I now have a 30cm lever and i apply a load of 20Kgs to it (extended mount)
The longer lever is going to exert significantly more leverage against it's base (chassis rail) even though the load at the top end is the same.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests