Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

SUSPENSION SETUP WINCH CHALLENGES

Tech Talk for Nissan owners.

Moderators: toaddog, V8Patrol

Posts: 4330
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:06 pm
Location: Central Victoria

Re: SUSPENSION SETUP WINCH CHALLENGES

Post by coxy321 »

ACF wrote:Front radius arm setup as factory
Rear 5 link as factory
Are you for real? Leave stock front radius arms on a 4" lift? No castor correction?
ACF wrote:Note Nissan spent millions to design these cars and they do work well with some strengthening to some components
Aren't ALL cars like this? Cars are built to a price, not a standard.[/quote]
ACF
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Mt Evelyn (vic)

Re: SUSPENSION SETUP WINCH CHALLENGES

Post by ACF »

coxy321 wrote:
ACF wrote:Front radius arm setup as factory
Rear 5 link as factory
Are you for real? Leave stock front radius arms on a 4" lift? No castor correction?
ACF wrote:Note Nissan spent millions to design these cars and they do work well with some strengthening to some components
Aren't ALL cars like this? Cars are built to a price, not a standard.
[/quote]


If you read my post it says.....front radius arm setup as factory.

Drop boxes......better, reducing downward angle($$$)

Aftermarket billet arms with castor correction....great(but $$$$$$)

Drop boxes with billet arms.....best($$$$$$$$$$$$$$)


Certainly cars are built to a price with componantry,.........but suspension geomentary has to be 100% otherwise the vehicle wouldn't drive out of the showroom.
Posts: 453
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: SUSPENSION SETUP WINCH CHALLENGES

Post by SuperiorEngineering »

ACF wrote:
poppeye wrote:am starting to slowly build a winch truck swb patrol so far i am going make it a ute wheelbase extension etc but was wondering what is the best suspension setup any help and pics appreciated

It seems this post has gone completely of track from the original question

Price for any suspension set up depends on what you want to achieve.
As far as WINCH CHALLENGE vehicles are concerned the suspension setup for your mid wheel base should be something as follows.............

Spring lift no more than 4"
Shocks no longer than 10" front, 12" rear
Modified bump stops
Front radius arm setup as factory
Rear 5 link as factory

Quality bolt on shocks are fine, can upgrade to .........dual shocks, smoothies, bypass.......At your expence

Coil overs are great but same deal no bigger than 10" / 12"

Anything that keeps your car low and stable is a positive
Anything that lifts your car and creates uneeded excess wheel travel is a negative


Note Nissan spent millions to design these cars and they do work well with some strengthening to some components
You have to remember winch challenge trucks certainly are not low budget trucks anymore, anywhere from 30K-100K+ The setup you have said would be okay for someone with a low budget buildup, the setup DEFINETALY will not be as capable or competitive as some of the setups mentioned previously. Their are a lot of Winch Challenge trucks running longarms and superflex arms and they do handle much better on hill climbs and the tight stuff than trucks running "standard 5 link and radius arms"
Flat out high speed than by all means the Drop box's will be better.
Some of the winch challenge trucks and Owners still live in the stone age as far as technology and thinking OUTSIDE THE SQUARE :roll:
and why is 10" and 12" shocks the best???????????
How bout Just put on simex , winch , standard 5 link and radius arms standard TD42 and bore the shit out of the spectators :rofl:
Last edited by SuperiorEngineering on Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
+++++NOW ON FACEBOOK++++++
www.superiorengineering.com.au
Largest 4x4 online superstore
SPONSOR OF TOUGH TRACKS
DGR RACE TEAM
JOOMBIE RACING
AMADA XTREME RACE TEAM
MAYBELINE RACING
MMM RACING
Posts: 1559
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:35 pm
Location: Captain Creek QLD

Post by Bush65 »

coxy321 wrote:...

- What is the vehicles "instant centre"?
...

Coxy
Just my 2 cents to clear up what the instant centre is.

Firstly I'm not critical of 1MadEngineer - he was explaining how instant centre fits in the scheme of things.

But he missed explaining exactly what instant centre is, and why it is named just that, and focused on what many want to know.

Concentrate on the 1st sketch that shows the upper and lower links, the axle housing and instant centre. Ignore the other information on that sketch for now.

The 2 links (only considering one side here) are fixed to the chassis at one end and the axle at the other end. When the axle end moves up/down, the links force it to swing through an arc.

Now it happens that the centre of the radius that the axle follows is at the point where the projected lines through the links intersect - as drawn on the sketch.

But, as the axle moves, the angle of the links change and so does their intersection. That is why it is called instant centre - it is only at that position for one instant, then it is somewhere else.

If the links were parallel, the instant centre is at infinity.
John
Posts: 1676
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:26 am
Location: brisbane

Post by 1MadEngineer »

Bush65 wrote:
coxy321 wrote:...

- What is the vehicles "instant centre"?
...

Coxy
Just my 2 cents to clear up what the instant centre is.

Firstly I'm not critical of 1MadEngineer - he was explaining how instant centre fits in the scheme of things.

But he missed explaining exactly what instant centre is, and why it is named just that, and focused on what many want to know.

Concentrate on the 1st sketch that shows the upper and lower links, the axle housing and instant centre. Ignore the other information on that sketch for now.

The 2 links (only considering one side here) are fixed to the chassis at one end and the axle at the other end. When the axle end moves up/down, the links force it to swing through an arc.

Now it happens that the centre of the radius that the axle follows is at the point where the projected lines through the links intersect - as drawn on the sketch.

But, as the axle moves, the angle of the links change and so does their intersection. That is why it is called instant centre - it is only at that position for one instant, then it is somewhere else.

If the links were parallel, the instant centre is at infinity.
yep what he said! I was just giving a breif intro to chassis dynamics, i even bore myself when trying to explain it properly :oops:
WWW.TEAMDGR.COM
WWW.SUPERIORENGINEERING.COM.AU
WWW.LOCKTUP4X4.COM.AU
Posts: 1676
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:26 am
Location: brisbane

Re: SUSPENSION SETUP WINCH CHALLENGES

Post by 1MadEngineer »

ACF wrote:Certainly cars are built to a price with componantry,.........but suspension geomentary has to be 100% otherwise the vehicle wouldn't drive out of the showroom.
NO, as everyone will agree cars are built with road manners as there primary concern and suspension articulation as a bonus! OEM's aren't really concerned about how much diff steer your 5"lifted truck is going to get, or how much wheel recession you will have when driving 3ft whoops at 80kph. They are concerned with suspension frequency or anti pitch values. SO why would you EVER try and retain FACTORY handling. FFS my absolute stocker tow rig rides like a bag of snot offroad! and you reckon thats how a COMP truck should go?

sorry to the other guys on here about the rant! as you can understand i am passionate about this stuff, and am very willing to help anyone out with ideas or setups. I help design this stuff cus' i want these trucks to evolve, i don't just guess at it, there is a lot of time spent drawing and measuring and calculating, to try and get an ACCEPTABLE outcome. I don't get paid for it (but free beer is always welcome) ;)
WWW.TEAMDGR.COM
WWW.SUPERIORENGINEERING.COM.AU
WWW.LOCKTUP4X4.COM.AU
Posts: 480
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2003 4:22 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by KIWI »

With the long arm kit, is it the fact the lower arms are longer, they are mounted further foward, or both, that makes the rear flex better?
Reason I ask is, I want to build up another truck so I don't wreck the GU, but am struggling to find a well priced lwb over here.
If I extend a swb (arms etc, not chassis) will I gain the same benefits, as I will be using longer lower arms?

Cheers,
Dave
Posts: 150
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:06 pm
Location: swan valley

Post by uzdnabuzd »

What about radflo smooties for outback/winch challenge truck. Apparently you can get them that bolt straigtht in??

Are they any good? do they rate against the foxes and kings?

Cheers

Zac
ACF
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Mt Evelyn (vic)

Post by ACF »

A few points to be noted here are that my sugestions are based of the fact that 95% of winch challenge cars in vic try to maintain factory suspension geometry for handling and stability because it works, also alot of guys are installing custom sway bars to reduce body roll.

If you noticed on previous page the 2 cars on the same part of the track, where they are fully flexed, note the red ute did have all its wheels on the ground but leaned over considerably more than the white ute. The white ute, on the other hand.... yes it lifted a wheel but still drivable and thats what diff locks are for.
As for a basic cheaper comp truck nothing is worse than your 100K car being beaten by a 30K car, it all comes down to driver ability that gets you on the podium. As was the case in engel rd 4 were huddy drove his production class carby gq with no mods to the original suspension, only 3" coils and bolt in shocks, he drove his way to outright 3rd over all.
If someone is asking for advice on a forum or around the camp fire thats becuase they dont have 100K to spend on a comp car or they would pay some one for advice.
10 and 12 inches of wheel travel seems to be enough but not to much to either destroy bushes constantly or drasticly change the handling of a car.
As we all know people have different opions and no one is right or wrong at the end of the day just different veiws.
Posts: 2601
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: warner, brisbane

Post by chunderlicious »

ACF wrote:A few points to be noted here are that my sugestions are based of the fact that 95% of winch challenge cars in vic try to maintain factory suspension geometry for handling and stability because it works, also alot of guys are installing custom sway bars to reduce body roll.

If you noticed on previous page the 2 cars on the same part of the track, where they are fully flexed, note the red ute did have all its wheels on the ground but leaned over considerably more than the white ute. The white ute, on the other hand.... yes it lifted a wheel but still drivable and thats what diff locks are for.
to be a stickler and nothing more, the red ute is actually on a different line and has the front alot higher up on the left. neither cars run sway bars too.
turbos are nice but i'd rather be blown
Posts: 574
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:49 am
Location: NZ

Post by nzdarin »

KIWI wrote:With the long arm kit, is it the fact the lower arms are longer, they are mounted further foward, or both, that makes the rear flex better?
Reason I ask is, I want to build up another truck so I don't wreck the GU, but am struggling to find a well priced lwb over here.
If I extend a swb (arms etc, not chassis) will I gain the same benefits, as I will be using longer lower arms?

Cheers,
Dave
I have a SWB that I have fitted long arms to to extend wheelbase and also get better handling.
When you lengthen the arms then the angles they are on are less when compared to the same lift on a truck with standard arms. Lower angles and less angle change gives better handling. My truck has too much squat which is the complete opposite to what would normally happen to lifted GQ. So I'm working out what to do to get a more neutral effect but still retain some squat as that is an advantage to how I drive.
So the way I've done it gives two advantages, long wheelbase (104.5) and also better suspesion geometry. Like the 'Mad one' has stated, it isn't guess work or trial and error, it is about deciding what you want to achieve and then modifying accordingly. Copying someone elses truck maybe the worst thing you do, or the best!
93 Nissan Pathfinder / Terrano Turboed VH45, GQ Trans and T-case, coil overs, hydraulic winch and fair bit of other stuff. (Currently a pile of parts in the workshop)
Posts: 453
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by SuperiorEngineering »

chunderlicious wrote:
ACF wrote:A few points to be noted here are that my sugestions are based of the fact that 95% of winch challenge cars in vic try to maintain factory suspension geometry for handling and stability because it works, also alot of guys are installing custom sway bars to reduce body roll.

If you noticed on previous page the 2 cars on the same part of the track, where they are fully flexed, note the red ute did have all its wheels on the ground but leaned over considerably more than the white ute. The white ute, on the other hand.... yes it lifted a wheel but still drivable and thats what diff locks are for.
to be a stickler and nothing more, the red ute is actually on a different line and has the front alot higher up on the left. neither cars run sway bars too.
Just to add/clarify this a bit more , Both trucks were built by us for 2 different purposes, the red truck is my "rock crawling, General purpose comp truck" Phills White GU is a daily driven 4x4.
The red truck uses Super Flex arms 18mm front coils and 18mm rear coils, Air shocks in the rear with 0 psi pressure in them and low in oil on that day so F***all rear shock absorbing happening,
The White GU fitted with our Superior Super Flex Radius arm 5 inch kit designed to be able to compete with and still drive home with , as well as being daily driving truck., the front coils 19mm and the rear 20mm.
Both trucks locked.
This is why the red GQ has more body roll because we designed it to be softer than a daily driver as the white GU is multi purpose .
At the end of the day both these trucks will outdrive a drop radius arm front 4x4.
Lockers or not a wheel in the air means that wheel its not making a contribution to forward momentum!
+++++NOW ON FACEBOOK++++++
www.superiorengineering.com.au
Largest 4x4 online superstore
SPONSOR OF TOUGH TRACKS
DGR RACE TEAM
JOOMBIE RACING
AMADA XTREME RACE TEAM
MAYBELINE RACING
MMM RACING
Posts: 1208
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:21 pm
Location: sunshine coast

Re: SUSPENSION SETUP WINCH CHALLENGES

Post by killalux »

ACF wrote:
poppeye wrote:am starting to slowly build a winch truck swb patrol so far i am going make it a ute wheelbase extension etc but was wondering what is the best suspension setup any help and pics appreciated

It seems this post has gone completely of track from the original question

Price for any suspension set up depends on what you want to achieve.
As far as WINCH CHALLENGE vehicles are concerned the suspension setup for your mid wheel base should be something as follows.............

Spring lift no more than 4"
Shocks no longer than 10" front, 12" rear
Modified bump stops
Front radius arm setup as factory
Rear 5 link as factory

Quality bolt on shocks are fine, can upgrade to .........dual shocks, smoothies, bypass.......At your expence

Coil overs are great but same deal no bigger than 10" / 12"

Anything that keeps your car low and stable is a positive
Anything that lifts your car and creates uneeded excess wheel travel is a negative


Note Nissan spent millions to design these cars and they do work well with some strengthening to some components

I beleive what 1mad is saying is relevant. Winch challenge series these days are evolving to stages that have long, very high speed sections, and then tight or steep winch sections. Cliffhanger is a great example of this.

1mad i beleive is saying that the 18" travel shocks/ coilovers are not there for huge flex, But more so for alot of up and down movement, So that the truck can be launched 3ft in the air and not bottom out and bend diffs when it lands. (like a stadium truck)

The fact is that alot of the top-runner winch trucks are built with huge budgets. ie, The truck that one cliffhanger this year has close to $20g is suspension alone :D
KILLA KUSTOM KABLES
CUSTOM AUTO ELECTRICAL SPECIALISTS
0404811498
LS1 & DURAMAX ENGINE CONVERSIONS, DRIVE IN DRIVE OUT. PATROLS AND CRUISERS

LS1 STANDALONE HARNESS $475ex
Posts: 965
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 10:09 am
Location: B.F.E

Post by RMP&O »

1MadEngineer wrote:
Hoonz wrote:are these shocks going to be affordable by the general public

are you's going to to develop a kit like the ATS 4x4 triple bypass kit?
the boys at LOCKTUP4x4 are organising mine and are ridiculously cheap. 4wdbits in nz do them as well.
http://www.4wdbits.co.nz/ProductsList.a ... lection=18

probably around $500ish for a 2.5" x 14"travel remote res which is nearly half what some guys are charging. (eg 2.0" x 14" fox from wizard =$745+)

eg 2.5"x4" air bumps from wizard = $465
2.5"x 4" FOAs from 4wdbits or locktup =~<$300
wow that is really expensive for the Fox. We can get those all day long here in the USA for $250-350 a shock. I would expect them to be more $$$ in Aus but not more than double our price!
www.rmp-o.com
Posts: 2877
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:46 pm
Location: Goodna QLD

Post by ludacris »

I would double check the prices of stuff from wizard. You may pay $745 for a remote resoirvoir coil over.

As for a winch challenge truck suspension set up. Start of with a 4 inch lift, brace your lower arms and get a pair of front drop radius arms.

Getting a good winch is far more important than coil overs especially if you are getting into the game for the first time.

Start competing then workout what mods are more important to suit you.

There are plenty of winning trucks that have standard suspension.

Evolve your truck slowly and enjoy the sport.

LudaCris
Cris's 4 X 4 Accessories & Suspension 0404 736 325 Rock Sliders From $499
Posts: 3739
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 10:10 pm

Post by mickyd555 »

ludacris wrote:I would double check the prices of stuff from wizard. You may pay $745 for a remote resoirvoir coil over.
The price i posted was for a non-coil remote res shock, but you would still need to check with Brent. I was only going off what he had them advertised in dirtcomp/4wd monthly mag (cant remember which one).
Posts: 3739
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 10:10 pm

Post by mickyd555 »

mickyd555 wrote:
ludacris wrote:I would double check the prices of stuff from wizard. You may pay $745 for a remote resoirvoir coil over.
The price i posted was for a non-coil remote res shock, but you would still need to check with Brent. I was only going off what he had them advertised in dirtcomp/4wd monthly mag (cant remember which one).
I found the add.

front shocks including replacement tower $999
rear shocks $849

its in edition 13 of dirt comp so i dont know if the prices are still valid??
Posts: 2877
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:46 pm
Location: Goodna QLD

Post by ludacris »

Sorry Micky. I was not having a go. I did pay a lot less than that from wizard for my fox remote resoivoirs and bump stops. :armsup:

LudaCris
Cris's 4 X 4 Accessories & Suspension 0404 736 325 Rock Sliders From $499
Posts: 1676
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:26 am
Location: brisbane

Re: SUSPENSION SETUP WINCH CHALLENGES

Post by 1MadEngineer »

killalux wrote: I beleive what 1mad is saying is relevant. Winch challenge series these days are evolving to stages that have long, very high speed sections, and then tight or steep winch sections. Cliffhanger is a great example of this.

1mad i beleive is saying that the 18" travel shocks/ coilovers are not there for huge flex, But more so for alot of up and down movement, So that the truck can be launched 3ft in the air and not bottom out and bend diffs when it lands. (like a stadium truck)

The fact is that alot of the top-runner winch trucks are built with huge budgets. ie, The truck that one cliffhanger this year has close to $20g is suspension alone :D
spot on mate! its more for compression and rebound.
The TOP vic trucks are fricken awesome and are built much like a US jeepspeed offroad racer, but i do know you will see a few new rigs show up with very similar setup to what i have suggested (hint - these are a few of the current top guys).
WWW.TEAMDGR.COM
WWW.SUPERIORENGINEERING.COM.AU
WWW.LOCKTUP4X4.COM.AU
Posts: 1676
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:26 am
Location: brisbane

Post by 1MadEngineer »

ludacris wrote:I would double check the prices of stuff from wizard. You may pay $745 for a remote resoirvoir coil over.

As for a winch challenge truck suspension set up. Start of with a 4 inch lift, brace your lower arms and get a pair of front drop radius arms.

Getting a good winch is far more important than coil overs especially if you are getting into the game for the first time.

Start competing then workout what mods are more important to suit you.

There are plenty of winning trucks that have standard suspension.

Evolve your truck slowly and enjoy the sport.

LudaCris

I used to think it was ALL in the winch, but after seeing how much a rig like Robbie Marshals can dominate, i have changed my mind. He runs a STOCK highmount, BUT he has a rig that absolutely hauls butt and handles VERY well.... it just puts down the power soooo much better than most, which IMO is a big factor in his success.



sorry if the prices are a bit wrong ATM but i got them that day straight of the applicable websites.
WWW.TEAMDGR.COM
WWW.SUPERIORENGINEERING.COM.AU
WWW.LOCKTUP4X4.COM.AU
Posts: 3739
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 10:10 pm

Post by mickyd555 »

ludacris wrote:Sorry Micky. I was not having a go. I did pay a lot less than that from wizard for my fox remote resoivoirs and bump stops. :armsup:

LudaCris
no worries Chris, i just wanted to clear it up as i think we have jumped from coil-over to non-coil a few times in this thread :lol:
Posts: 838
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:01 am
Location: SPRINGMOUNTAIN BRISBANE

Post by pigletracing »

hey you have gotta luv the picks of the red gq showing its flex on the ramp,, (I didnt bother to read the small print) But did notice in the ramp shots there were no shocks on it to limit its travle, but there were big silver ones on for the hill climb......
I dont know what Laurrie Sternback is doing wrong with his winch truck !!!!
he has the old fasioned coil & shock setup in the front, & has even older technolagy of coils over leaf pack in the rear !!!!!
& is still at the pointy end of the field each event...
basicly Just enjoy it keep it as low as possible, cut your guards for up travle,,, & have shiteloads of fun..
DAIHATSU FEROZA UTE,V6,caged,lokd 35's
NOW SOLD
& then
GQ DUAL CAB TUFF UTE,caged,lokd,35's
NOW SOLD
& then
JK WRANGLER 4 DOOR TUFF TOURER,lifted,lokd, 35s
Posts: 2877
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:46 pm
Location: Goodna QLD

Post by ludacris »

1MadEngineer wrote:
ludacris wrote:I would double check the prices of stuff from wizard. You may pay $745 for a remote resoirvoir coil over.

As for a winch challenge truck suspension set up. Start of with a 4 inch lift, brace your lower arms and get a pair of front drop radius arms.

Getting a good winch is far more important than coil overs especially if you are getting into the game for the first time.

Start competing then workout what mods are more important to suit you.

There are plenty of winning trucks that have standard suspension.

Evolve your truck slowly and enjoy the sport.

LudaCris

I used to think it was ALL in the winch, but after seeing how much a rig like Robbie Marshals can dominate, i have changed my mind. He runs a STOCK highmount, BUT he has a rig that absolutely hauls butt and handles VERY well.... it just puts down the power soooo much better than most, which IMO is a big factor in his success.



sorry if the prices are a bit wrong ATM but i got them that day straight of the applicable websites.
Cris's 4 X 4 Accessories & Suspension 0404 736 325 Rock Sliders From $499
Posts: 838
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:01 am
Location: SPRINGMOUNTAIN BRISBANE

Post by pigletracing »

I think you will find that the big factor in rob marshals success is robs
BALLS & ALL DRIVING SKILLS !!! if you put him in the production class, in a stock GQ like every one else,, he 'd still be at the pointy end of the field....
DAIHATSU FEROZA UTE,V6,caged,lokd 35's
NOW SOLD
& then
GQ DUAL CAB TUFF UTE,caged,lokd,35's
NOW SOLD
& then
JK WRANGLER 4 DOOR TUFF TOURER,lifted,lokd, 35s
Posts: 1676
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:26 am
Location: brisbane

Post by 1MadEngineer »

pigletracing wrote:I think you will find that the big factor in rob marshals success is robs
BALLS & ALL DRIVING SKILLS !!! if you put him in the production class, in a stock GQ like every one else,, he 'd still be at the pointy end of the field....
Yep, robbie is fricken good behind the wheel. I am helping him go engine shopping ATM :twisted: and everyone thought his last truck had power! this thing will be evil......
WWW.TEAMDGR.COM
WWW.SUPERIORENGINEERING.COM.AU
WWW.LOCKTUP4X4.COM.AU
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: laying on your couch

Post by gqpete »

1MadEngineer wrote:
pigletracing wrote:I think you will find that the big factor in rob marshals success is robs
BALLS & ALL DRIVING SKILLS !!! if you put him in the production class, in a stock GQ like every one else,, he 'd still be at the pointy end of the field....
Yep, robbie is fricken good behind the wheel. I am helping him go engine shopping ATM :twisted: and everyone thought his last truck had power! this thing will be evil......
sometimes slower is faster :cool:
lick my vinegary balls.
veeeeryniiiice
Posts: 1119
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Melbourne, looking at the hills for snow

Post by LOCKEE »

gqpete wrote:
1MadEngineer wrote:
pigletracing wrote:I think you will find that the big factor in rob marshals success is robs
BALLS & ALL DRIVING SKILLS !!! if you put him in the production class, in a stock GQ like every one else,, he 'd still be at the pointy end of the field....
Yep, robbie is fricken good behind the wheel. I am helping him go engine shopping ATM :twisted: and everyone thought his last truck had power! this thing will be evil......
sometimes slower is faster :cool:
Pete,

having been competitive in the more basic longy then the all out MWB, what you suggest to start with?

Lockee
:rofl: :popcorn: :snipersmile:
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: laying on your couch

Post by gqpete »

try the sandy bowman school of driving.
the amount of times my high powered mwb has only been a second or two infront,or if not , been beaten by his carbie with 12v winch.
lick my vinegary balls.
veeeeryniiiice
Posts: 2877
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:46 pm
Location: Goodna QLD

Post by ludacris »

pigletracing wrote:I think you will find that the big factor in rob marshals success is robs
BALLS & ALL DRIVING SKILLS !!! if you put him in the production class, in a stock GQ like every one else,, he 'd still be at the pointy end of the field....
You are spot on there Piglet.

And his winch is not STOCK.

LudaCris
Cris's 4 X 4 Accessories & Suspension 0404 736 325 Rock Sliders From $499
Posts: 2601
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: warner, brisbane

Post by chunderlicious »

the point greg was making was that robbies winch still only has 1 6hp 24v motor.... not 2 motors and gears and stuff
turbos are nice but i'd rather be blown
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests