Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

3.0 V 3.5?

Tech Talk for Mitsubishi owners.

Moderator: -Scott-

Post Reply
Posts: 401
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Wagga NSW

3.0 V 3.5?

Post by Fmx_Aus »

G'day,

Looking around at a few Pajero's and wondering the positives and negatives of the two (3.0 and 3.5)??

Anything to look out for on the two?

Sorry if this has been covered, tried the search and couldnt find what I was after :?
Posts: 1107
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 6:44 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by hudson44 »

The 3.0lt is a pretty good reliable engine however a little underpowered. The 3.5 quad cam is a bit of a lemon, engine wise (and a prick to work on) but they make great power from what they are. The later 3.5 is a single cam and in my opinion the pick of the bunch as it's based more on the 3.0lt but with more power and torque. My next rig will be an NL with the later 3.5.

As with any car they have common faults. Water pumps and timing belts need to be replaced at the designated service intervals on all 3 engines as they don't tend to last long past the recommended service life. The Mitsubishi lifters are pretty ordinary and can become annoyingly noisy but with regular servicing they tend to be alright. Other common problem i have seen are heads cracking on the 3lt and DOHC 3.5, and cams can seize on the DOHC as well. Valve stem seals tend to go every 100- 150k which will cause smoking on start up and at idle. The seals are only worth about $20 - $30 however with labour costs can be quite expensive, especially with the DOHC version.

I hope this helps you decide but IMHO i would be looking at the later 3.5lt single cam.
Posts: 401
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Wagga NSW

Post by Fmx_Aus »

Thanks for the info champ. Am looking at a 3.0 that has just been reco'd at the moment.

Was looking around at another patrol, but Pajero's seem cheaper and a better family vehicle that we can take away on the weekends and do the odd trip up to Townsville a few times a year. (and abit easier for the Mrs to drive).

Never owned a Paj before, but have always kept a eye out for a decent one.

Thanks once again for the info mate ;)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests