Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Laminova Cored Intercoolers (Home Brew 2. GQ TD 42 )

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 1350
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:48 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast - Brisbane

Post by money_killer »

marin wrote:
money_killer wrote:why dont uses make a complete new inlet manifold the stock ones are crap does not evenly flow with the entry in the centre.
Look back a few pages and you will see that is exactly what we have done with mine.... the idea of a bolt on 1 is that it will be cheaper....

marin
cool cool have uses got and before and after dyno results yet last time i looked uses didnt....?
Posts: 1590
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Tarneit, Vic

Post by matt.mcinnes »

Weiner wrote:Saw you last night in Mitcham Matt, how is the cooler liking this weather?
Dam site better than me :D
http://www.fj40-2f-eti-locked-n-loaded.com

Advanced (HB) Intercoolers
http://advancedhbintercoolers.com
Posts: 693
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 2:37 pm
Location: Rochedale South - Brisbane

Post by benhl »

matt.mcinnes wrote:In the mean time we have a willing candidate for the bolt on version it seems :armsup:

Image
Who?? Feel free to chime in... :D

I'm very keen to see how this puppy goes compared to a new manifold version. Just managed to blow my turbo so BB Garrett going in, bigger ZD30 airbox lid and rebuilt bigger capacity fuel pump. All ready for a Laminova IC!!! Keep up the top work boys.

btw - @ $2500ish i think quality, performance improvements and efficiency of the system is well worth the $$.
GU 4.2 TD Garrett BB Hi-flow, M8274 + Bells & Whistles with plenty of fruit still on the list!
[b][color=red]\ m / ( > . < ) \ m /[/color][/b]
Posts: 1590
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Tarneit, Vic

Post by matt.mcinnes »

benhl wrote:
Who?? Feel free to chime in... :D

I'm very keen to see how this puppy goes compared to a new manifold version. Just managed to blow my turbo so BB Garrett going in, bigger ZD30 airbox lid and rebuilt bigger capacity fuel pump. All ready for a Laminova IC!!! Keep up the top work boys.

btw - @ $2500ish i think quality, performance improvements and efficiency of the system is well worth the $$.
Benhl I guess you have waited long enough, following this from it's early days, I had a good look at a GU tray 4.2T with a top mount air to air on Monday at Dzltec's, almost managed to burn my hand on the intercooler pre and post both red hot.

There is a vacuum operated thing :D on one side of the intercooler, will this need to be incorporated into ours for GU's? I think it was on the intake side.

The actual manifold itself looks like Marin's GQ, are their any differences?

If not are you up to bolting one on a GU for testing with pre and post results?

Guinea Pig discount applies.
http://www.fj40-2f-eti-locked-n-loaded.com

Advanced (HB) Intercoolers
http://advancedhbintercoolers.com
Posts: 2347
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:56 pm
Location: Perth

Post by Z()LTAN »

Thats an EGR valve Matt it recirculates some exhaust back into the intake.

Thats why they get red hot
Locktup4x4.com.au - For all of your hardcore gear

Outlaws4x4.com
Posts: 1590
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Tarneit, Vic

Post by matt.mcinnes »

Z()LTAN wrote:Thats an EGR valve Matt it recirculates some exhaust back into the intake.

Thats why they get red hot
So not essential then :D
http://www.fj40-2f-eti-locked-n-loaded.com

Advanced (HB) Intercoolers
http://advancedhbintercoolers.com
Posts: 693
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 2:37 pm
Location: Rochedale South - Brisbane

Post by benhl »

matt.mcinnes wrote:
benhl wrote:
Who?? Feel free to chime in... :D

I'm very keen to see how this puppy goes compared to a new manifold version. Just managed to blow my turbo so BB Garrett going in, bigger ZD30 airbox lid and rebuilt bigger capacity fuel pump. All ready for a Laminova IC!!! Keep up the top work boys.

btw - @ $2500ish i think quality, performance improvements and efficiency of the system is well worth the $$.
Benhl I guess you have waited long enough, following this from it's early days, I had a good look at a GU tray 4.2T with a top mount air to air on Monday at Dzltec's, almost managed to burn my hand on the intercooler pre and post both red hot.

There is a vacuum operated thing :D on one side of the intercooler, will this need to be incorporated into ours for GU's? I think it was on the intake side.

The actual manifold itself looks like Marin's GQ, are their any differences?

If not are you up to bolting one on a GU for testing with pre and post results?

Guinea Pig discount applies.
Happy to be a guinea pig, have a great mechanic with Dyno who would be willing to test inc pre and post figures etc etc... in Brisbane though, so if you're happy to post i'm happy to test :D

WRT the "thing" mine doesn't have EGR it as it's not factory IC, just factory turboed (originally). GU's with factory Top Mount IC do have the EGR however anyone who is looking at this sort of set up really should have that blocked off already anyway (common practice). So therefore not necessary IMHO.

WRT the manifold, i believe the general set up is the same as GQ's - where this would all bolt up to anyway. The only difference is that the GU's have a few more mounting studs on the manifold to the block (so i've been told)? better check... although shouldn't affect what we're talking about.

Mine now has BB centre in hiflowed factory housings, ZD30 airbox lid 3" outlet to 2.5" turbo inlet, not fully dyno'd yet but will probably end up at about 13psi. Also rebuilt fuel pump with larger internals and timing mods (still being done so not sure of final specs) by Highway Diesel, 3" BE dump and straight through 3" Exhaust no muffler. Std diff gears with 35's. will see how we go with final dyno figures - will post as soon as finished.

Let me know about guinea piggin'!! :D
Last edited by benhl on Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
GU 4.2 TD Garrett BB Hi-flow, M8274 + Bells & Whistles with plenty of fruit still on the list!
[b][color=red]\ m / ( > . < ) \ m /[/color][/b]
Posts: 1590
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Tarneit, Vic

Post by matt.mcinnes »

Cool I will make 2 identical bolt on intercoolers for for the QU and one for the GQ at the same time.

Happy to post.

You will however have to figure out your heat exchanger.

I have pm'd a price.

End caps to suit dash 8 or hose tails?
http://www.fj40-2f-eti-locked-n-loaded.com

Advanced (HB) Intercoolers
http://advancedhbintercoolers.com
User avatar
sw1
Posts: 297
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 10:06 am
Location: around the place

Post by sw1 »

matt.mcinnes wrote:
There is a vacuum operated thing :D on one side of the intercooler, will this need to be incorporated into ours for GU's? I think it was on the intake side.
its not the egr vavle itself but a valve to interurpt air flow from the turbo, so that egr can flow.

anyway, if egr is blocked its not needed (egr only present on a 4.2 2003 and up)
2003 GU Patrol ST 4.2L Diesel Turbo Intercooled
1988 D21 Pathfinder 3.8L V6 & T700 - SOLD 11/12
Posts: 1590
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Tarneit, Vic

Post by matt.mcinnes »

sw1 wrote:
matt.mcinnes wrote:
There is a vacuum operated thing :D on one side of the intercooler, will this need to be incorporated into ours for GU's? I think it was on the intake side.
its not the egr vavle itself but a valve to interurpt air flow from the turbo, so that egr can flow.

anyway, if egr is blocked its not needed (egr only present on a 4.2 2003 and up)
Either way we can if required incorporated it.

Now should I start a new thread for the generic one, I hate wading through pages and pages of posts or should I just carry this one on?
http://www.fj40-2f-eti-locked-n-loaded.com

Advanced (HB) Intercoolers
http://advancedhbintercoolers.com
Posts: 4275
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by ozy1 »

start a new post for the generic one, there will be alot interested,

work looking awesome as usual,
Posts: 1590
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Tarneit, Vic

Post by matt.mcinnes »

ozy1 wrote:start a new post for the generic one, there will be alot interested,

work looking awesome as usual,
I agree, now back to cadding up the manifold flange :D

New Post started :D
http://www.fj40-2f-eti-locked-n-loaded.com

Advanced (HB) Intercoolers
http://advancedhbintercoolers.com
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:32 pm
Location: Mitcham

Laminova Cored Intercoolers (Home Brew 2. GQ TD 42 )

Post by busman »

Hi All,

On Sunday i caught up with Matt to check out the intercooler and drive Marin's Mav. I currently own my third GQ TD42 all have had DTS turbo kits fitted, the first two were manual and the current one is auto. All i can say is awesome! this thing flies for a vehicle running 11psi and a standard pump with low egt's. Roll out the bolt on's! I'm getting one :armsup:
Posts: 2186
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:11 pm
Location: Melbourne, now with 1HDFTi power!

Post by +dj_hansen+ »

matt.mcinnes wrote:
ozy1 wrote:start a new post for the generic one, there will be alot interested,

work looking awesome as usual,
I agree, now back to cadding up the manifold flange :D

New Post started :D
If you need cad help; let me know Matt.
Cheers,
Dan.

[i]1996 HDJ80R[/i]
Posts: 3740
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:04 pm
Location: Licking a window near you

Post by 80's_delirious »

This thread has been very interesting.
Been thinking about the variables in something like this.
Some obvious ones are intake temps, boost, overall intake airflow rates, size of cooler and radiator cores, water/coolant volume in the system, coolant flow rate, fan speed, fan efficiency

You had quite an improvement by adding a second fan to Marin's rig, so I am wondering, have you tried changing the flow rate of the water pump?
Is there an optimum rate of water circulation to enable the most efficient exchange of heat through the radiator?
Davies Craig flows 80L/min?
Be interested to know if say 90 or 100L/min or even 75L/min gave any benefit?
Obviously every car that is given a custom setup is going to have any number of differences, it could be one more thing that can be fine tuned to maximise the gains.
Posts: 1590
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Tarneit, Vic

Post by matt.mcinnes »

80's_delirious wrote:This thread has been very interesting.
Been thinking about the variables in something like this.
Some obvious ones are intake temps, boost, overall intake airflow rates, size of cooler and radiator cores, water/coolant volume in the system, coolant flow rate, fan speed, fan efficiency

You had quite an improvement by adding a second fan to Marin's rig, so I am wondering, have you tried changing the flow rate of the water pump?
Is there an optimum rate of water circulation to enable the most efficient exchange of heat through the radiator?
Davies Craig flows 80L/min?
Be interested to know if say 90 or 100L/min or even 75L/min gave any benefit?
Obviously every car that is given a custom setup is going to have any number of differences, it could be one more thing that can be fine tuned to maximise the gains.
I run the davies Craig 110, we also have a speed controller for the pump, So something for the future to play with.
We have the intercooler down pat I feel they require 20Ltr Pre min each. The heat exchangers are still ongoing. I would be nice to have a big test budget to play with but then it would all be too easy.
http://www.fj40-2f-eti-locked-n-loaded.com

Advanced (HB) Intercoolers
http://advancedhbintercoolers.com
Posts: 1590
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Tarneit, Vic

Post by matt.mcinnes »

Well Marin has left the building after flying in from Perth he's picked up the Mav and headed home.

I miss it already :cry:

Where are the keys for the 40 I need an injection of 182kw of Toyota :armsup:
http://www.fj40-2f-eti-locked-n-loaded.com

Advanced (HB) Intercoolers
http://advancedhbintercoolers.com
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:41 pm
Location: Brisvegas

Post by SilverBulletBM »

I would have thought that a slower water flow would be better as it would give more time for heat transfer to take place, plz correct me if im wrong.

Another idea that might really make this system a kick ass cooler, a slightly small heat exchanger in front of the radiator and a large resivour mounted somewhere under the bonnet. You could get the resivour custom made and put a small S pipe through it and run the low side for the a/c through it to get the water super cold.
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 8:41 pm
Location: All Mav'ed up!!! (Melbourne)

Post by marin »

ummmmmm F.CK YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! the torque this thing now has is aweeeeeeeeeesome..... cruising along and boot it and it actually moooooooves now!

but having said that, more boost would be nice :twisted:

marin
Rum injected

TD42T shorty... got some bolt on and some custom stuff.

Read about it [url=http://www.patrol4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18848]here![/url]
Posts: 1590
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Tarneit, Vic

Post by matt.mcinnes »

marin wrote:ummmmmm F.CK YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! the torque this thing now has is aweeeeeeeeeesome..... cruising along and boot it and it actually moooooooves now!

but having said that, more boost would be nice :twisted:

marin
I would like to thank Marin AKA Ben for been good enough to let us test one on is Mav, can we have it back now please :D

Well onto the Generic Bolt on version :armsup: http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/ftopic164122.php
http://www.fj40-2f-eti-locked-n-loaded.com

Advanced (HB) Intercoolers
http://advancedhbintercoolers.com
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:39 pm
Location: In a horse near you

Post by chimpboy »

matt.mcinnes wrote:I run the davies Craig 110, we also have a speed controller for the pump, So something for the future to play with.
We have the intercooler down pat I feel they require 20Ltr Pre min each. The heat exchangers are still ongoing. I would be nice to have a big test budget to play with but then it would all be too easy.
Have you considered a mechanical water pump, instead of the electric one? Just wondering; it might actually be simpler once the first one was sorted. Those electric pumps generally move a lot less water than a belt-driven one would.
SilverBulletBM wrote:I would have thought that a slower water flow would be better as it would give more time for heat transfer to take place, plz correct me if im wrong.
Nope, more flow equals better cooling. IMHO there would be no downside to getting the water flow as massive as possible here and if a second fan made that much difference, then more pump power might as well.
This is not legal advice.
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 8:41 pm
Location: All Mav'ed up!!! (Melbourne)

Post by marin »

chimpboy wrote:SNIP

Nope, more flow equals better cooling. IMHO there would be no downside to getting the water flow as massive as possible here and if a second fan made that much difference, then more pump power might as well.
I strongly disagree.... if the water passes through the radiator too fast, it doesn't allow it to have optimum cooling time, hence in extreme cooling applications like drag cars etc, they go for a triple bypass radiator to INCREASE the time that that water is in the radiator for.

marin
Rum injected

TD42T shorty... got some bolt on and some custom stuff.

Read about it [url=http://www.patrol4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18848]here![/url]
Posts: 4330
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:06 pm
Location: Central Victoria

Post by coxy321 »

marin wrote:
chimpboy wrote:SNIP

Nope, more flow equals better cooling. IMHO there would be no downside to getting the water flow as massive as possible here and if a second fan made that much difference, then more pump power might as well.
I strongly disagree.... if the water passes through the radiator too fast, it doesn't allow it to have optimum cooling time, hence in extreme cooling applications like drag cars etc, they go for a triple bypass radiator to INCREASE the time that that water is in the radiator for.

marin
And no doubt this would also be the case for the intercooler, having the water move at such a rate as to absorb sufficient heat from the intake charge, but not to be so slow that halts the transfer of heat in the W/A intercooling system.
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:39 pm
Location: In a horse near you

Post by chimpboy »

marin wrote:
chimpboy wrote:SNIP

Nope, more flow equals better cooling. IMHO there would be no downside to getting the water flow as massive as possible here and if a second fan made that much difference, then more pump power might as well.
I strongly disagree.... if the water passes through the radiator too fast, it doesn't allow it to have optimum cooling time, hence in extreme cooling applications like drag cars etc, they go for a triple bypass radiator to INCREASE the time that that water is in the radiator for.

marin
This is factually incorrect, but it is a mistake that a lot of people seem to make.
This is not legal advice.
Posts: 4330
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:06 pm
Location: Central Victoria

Post by coxy321 »

chimpboy wrote:
marin wrote:
chimpboy wrote:SNIP

Nope, more flow equals better cooling. IMHO there would be no downside to getting the water flow as massive as possible here and if a second fan made that much difference, then more pump power might as well.
I strongly disagree.... if the water passes through the radiator too fast, it doesn't allow it to have optimum cooling time, hence in extreme cooling applications like drag cars etc, they go for a triple bypass radiator to INCREASE the time that that water is in the radiator for.

marin
This is factually incorrect, but it is a mistake that a lot of people seem to make.
I'm not questioning you here, but is there some documentation/theory to prove this?
Posts: 2298
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 11:26 pm
Location: nsw maitland

Post by cooter »

chimpboy wrote:
marin wrote:
chimpboy wrote:SNIP

Nope, more flow equals better cooling. IMHO there would be no downside to getting the water flow as massive as possible here and if a second fan made that much difference, then more pump power might as well.
I strongly disagree.... if the water passes through the radiator too fast, it doesn't allow it to have optimum cooling time, hence in extreme cooling applications like drag cars etc, they go for a triple bypass radiator to INCREASE the time that that water is in the radiator for.

marin
This is factually incorrect, but it is a mistake that a lot of people seem to make.
to what are you saying is incorect that low flow means better cooling as i am anxiouse to hear your theory
http://www.4wdaction.com.au/shed/index.php?id=1097&im=1
[quote="squik"]He He... every time I turn off my protection my box gets slammed with spam....
[/quote]
Posts: 2158
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:16 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by KiwiBacon »

cooter wrote: to what are you saying is incorect that low flow means better cooling as i am anxiouse to hear your theory
Faster flow gives better cooling.
It makes the water more turbulent which improves heat transfer.
Posts: 295
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 5:34 pm

Post by azzad »

There will be an optimum flow for heat transfer, how you work that out in this application, I dont know.

Too much flow is as bad as too little flow.

I have experience with commercial Air Conditioning and Hydronics commisioning, which is setting up water flows for Chilled and Heated Water circuits for Air Handling Units.

Dazza
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:39 pm
Location: In a horse near you

Post by chimpboy »

coxy321 wrote:I'm not questioning you here, but is there some documentation/theory to prove this?
I don't want to ruin this excellent thread, but let's say it would be great to see some different temperature readings based on a consistent engine rpm and varied flow rates with that adjustable electric pump.

My guess is that at any rate of flow that the electric pump (or a belt-driven one, which would be cool to use instead) can manage you will get better cooling with more pumping. It will probably top out at some flow level but I am not sure that flow level will be available with the davies craig item.

I am not being negative about the ICs, they are fugging awesome, I am just saying that imho more air flow (fans) more water flow (pump) and more heat exchange surface area (radiator) are going to be good things here.

Bigger coolant reservoir would be good too, within reason.
This is not legal advice.
Posts: 4330
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:06 pm
Location: Central Victoria

Post by coxy321 »

chimpboy wrote:
coxy321 wrote:I'm not questioning you here, but is there some documentation/theory to prove this?
I don't want to ruin this excellent thread, but let's say it would be great to see some different temperature readings based on a consistent engine rpm and varied flow rates with that adjustable electric pump.

My guess is that at any rate of flow that the electric pump (or a belt-driven one, which would be cool to use instead) can manage you will get better cooling with more pumping. It will probably top out at some flow level but I am not sure that flow level will be available with the davies craig item.

I am not being negative about the ICs, they are fugging awesome, I am just saying that imho more air flow (fans) more water flow (pump) and more heat exchange surface area (radiator) are going to be good things here.

Bigger coolant reservoir would be good too, within reason.
I was just seeing if you had anything like Bens air filter documentation re K&N vs paper filters.

My theory is that the more water you subject to the heat of the intercooler unnecessarily, the quicker you are going to bring up the mean temperature of the coolant. Obviously a flow rate that is too slow is going to be "holding" hot water at the intercooler which then becomes useless.

Also, having a flow rate too fast would impede on the front heat transfer units ability to cool the coolant as it passes through.

I think it would all have to be a compromise - however i also think that there would be an optimum flow rate, something that only testing could find.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests