Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

0 - 100 times

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 474
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: Canberra

Post by A.J. »

Sub 2sec? Yeah right. PICS AND VIDEOS PLEASE :finger:

My modified BMW M5 (3.8 straight six) did it in 5.2sec.
That was back when I was living in Germany, I sold that car for about 10grand (AUS) when I left to come back to Oz....... Over here they're 40k+..... :?

I haven't timed the GU yet but with the turbo it goes a lot better...... I have to back off though as the boost controller isn't opening up so it runs full boost....... gotta watch that gauge when it goes higher than 9psi..... Had it up to 12 once :oops:
2001 GU Patrol DX wagon, TD42, Air Lockers, twin spare carrier, Barrett HF, 35" Treps, high pinion rear, Staun beadlocks, 60l Engel and more!
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: Lara Victoria

Post by Ruffy »

Skegbudley wrote:As long as its not my brothers rex.
Sub 2sec to 100kph.
Genuine street car does 142mph at end of 1/4 mile.
A 142 mph pass is about a mid 9 second run give or take. So he's doing a 100km/h in under 2 seconds but then it takes him another 7.5 seconds to get the next 125mk/h out of it.. must be set up shit or a shit driver.
Oh and by the way, by my calculations, well estimates, i figure to shift a 1.2 ton mass from 0 - 100km/h with a drive ratioof app 20:1 with a 75 inch drive wheel would take about 700-800kw..nice daily driver.
[quote="Uhhohh"]As far as an indecent proposal goes, I'd accept nothing less than $100,000 to tolerate buggery. Any less and it's just not worth the psychological trauma. [/quote]
Posts: 848
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 12:01 pm
Location: Central Victoria

Post by Patroler »

A Bugatti veyron goes 0-100 in 2.8sec, would take a heck of a lot more power to shave .8 off of that - and its already got 1000hp to start with...
There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots
Posts: 188
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:49 pm
Location: Blackburn

Post by cmarico »

It's ok - the car runs on hopes and dreams!!
Posts: 2472
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 4:17 pm
Location: Blaxland... Just up from Renriff!

Post by -Nemesis- »

Not to mention it would need about 17 wrx gearbox's in tandem to stand up to that sort of power hehehe....

I'm thinking someone wishes they thought more before they posted.

Though it is kinda possible, I doubt the authenticity of it. Unless the guy has spent $100k on it who knows. Proof?
Lovin the FZJ105-T, bling by Ryano
Posts: 2158
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:16 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by KiwiBacon »

chimpboy wrote:Who knew so many people here had such powerful imaginations!

A sub-2-second WRX... :armsup:
Such performance is free.
Because broken watches usually are. :D
Posts: 188
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:49 pm
Location: Blackburn

Post by cmarico »

-Nemesis- wrote:Not to mention it would need about 17 wrx gearbox's in tandem to stand up to that sort of power hehehe....

I'm thinking someone wishes they thought more before they posted.

Though it is kinda possible, I doubt the authenticity of it. Unless the guy has spent $100k on it who knows. Proof?
Even if he'd spent 100k on it, his biggest problem would be getting that traction to ground. I can't see him being able to put that sort of power to ground in a street legal car on street-ish tyres. Also remembering that your speedo measures from the drivetrain - not always actual speed (ie if your spinning the wheels).
Posts: 264
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:24 am
Location: Perth

Post by nabstud »

A 5000hp top fuel dragster can do 0-100 in about 1 sec so a wrx should do it in under 2 secs no worries ;)
Posts: 168
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 10:28 am

Post by mangie »

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topi ... ck%20Cobra

Found this looking for the fastest WRX, talk about GRUNT! 0-187mph in 10 seconds :shock: :shock:
Posts: 1113
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:20 pm
Location: QLD

Post by Skegbudley »

Sober now. :oops:
I got 60' mixed up with 60mph. At this point I will blame Bundy bear. :D

Its sub 5sec.
1/4 mile: 10.0 sec @ 142mph
60 foot : 1.52 sec
Thats in full street trim. 422kw at all 4 wheels.
GU Patrol with go better bits added
Posts: 2472
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 4:17 pm
Location: Blaxland... Just up from Renriff!

Post by -Nemesis- »

Has he put a dog box in it or something? Rex boxes barely hold onto a basic boost increase as it is (driven hard)
Lovin the FZJ105-T, bling by Ryano
Posts: 1113
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:20 pm
Location: QLD

Post by Skegbudley »

Ruffy - Yes its got over 700hp at flywheel. 3150lbs inc driver.
He drives it a lot. To and from the track. Not his daily drive anymore cause he's got a blowen Calais for his work car now.

Nemesis - Its a standard box with a PPG dog engagement gearset fitted.
There aren't any sub 10 sec manual WRXs in the country. He is planning on being the first. once he does a 9 ,there is a full drag auto gearbox in the garage which will guarantee 9 sec passes.

Proof - Check out results for 2008 Jamboree. E.Brittain.
10.0 @142 on DOT tyres and Shell V-power.

Now if you could lift one up about a foot it would get interesting.
GU Patrol with go better bits added
Posts: 1912
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:15 pm
Location: VIC

Post by beinthemud »

just for the record the wrx box 3rd gear is weak as piss so let me know when he blows it up ,cause ive done so many of them i can have it sitting on the ground in an hour
Manuels= 4wd,cars,bikes,guns,trucks,race cars
Automatics=washing machines,dish washers,fridges
User avatar
HG
Posts: 450
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Mexico where the hills are big

Post by HG »

HOT DAMN I'm building an MR2 with 3 rockets :armsup:
Cheers
Andrew
----------------------
Just a few mods, nothing over the top.:)
Posts: 1113
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:20 pm
Location: QLD

Post by Skegbudley »

beinthemud wrote:just for the record the wrx box 3rd gear is weak as piss so let me know when he blows it up ,cause ive done so many of them i can have it sitting on the ground in an hour
Its a dog box. It don't break.
GU Patrol with go better bits added
Posts: 1413
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 5:54 pm
Location: Perth

Post by Moph »

Bro-in-law has a GQ with a somewhat worked RB30DET in it, running in the low 6's at the moment on a stock clutch. Major clutch slippage so a new one will be going in soon.
Posts: 2347
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:56 pm
Location: Perth

Post by Z()LTAN »

this is was a doomed thread from the start... top work to the thread maker...

Oh and i get .00002 seconds to the 100k mark eh...
Locktup4x4.com.au - For all of your hardcore gear

Outlaws4x4.com
Posts: 2472
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 4:17 pm
Location: Blaxland... Just up from Renriff!

Post by -Nemesis- »

Z()LTAN wrote:this is was a doomed thread from the start... top work to the thread maker...
.
Depends, for people not interested it is.


For some of us, we like to have plenty of cake and eat it too. What's wrong with building something that's fun on road as well?

My 4Runner will probably follow >80% of the trucks on this site off road, yet is still a blast day to day embarrasing road cars. I can have fun getting to the tracks, not just on them. Best of both worlds I reckon.


So for me, I find it interesting to hear what other peoples mods have netted.
Lovin the FZJ105-T, bling by Ryano
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

Skegbudley wrote: There aren't any sub 10 sec manual WRXs in the country. He is planning on being the first.
Keep pulling on it...

Vehicle: V5 2 Door STI
Engine: EJ20 Sleeved Stage 3
Power: 618hp
Best E.T: 8.341 @ 158.69mph
Induction: Innovative T72, Custom MOOD Motorsport Intercooler, Modified MY01 plenum, 8 x 1600cc injectors, Enderle 110 mechanical fuel pump, 4-1 extractors, 2 stage NOS
Internals: TRP Sleeves, Forged Mahle pistons, billet conrods, copper head gaskets, O-Ringed head & block, TRP 14mm Headstuds, Stage 3 heads, dry sump system
Ignition: Microtech X4 with MSD coil packs
Exhaust: 3.5" Straight through
Engine Management: Microtech LT-10
Boost Control: HKS 60mm Wastegate, Turbosmart eBoost 60psi

Drivetrain:
Converter: ASNU Billet
Transmission: BMS Modified Subaru Auto, reverse pattern shift, custom billet valve body, trans brake
Diff: Ford 9", Moser 35 spline axles, Harrop alloy center and carrier, full spool, standard subaru front diff with PPG LSD, front STI shafts
Vehicle: MY99 STI
Power: 568hp

Best ET: 9.77@140mph
Engine: EJ2025 Stege 3
Induction: T66 Ballbearing turbo, custom FMIC, 38mm wastegate, NOS
Ignition: Microtech X4
Exhaust: 3' Mandrel bent
Engine Management: Microtech LT-10s


Drivetrain:
Gearbox: TRP 4EAT 4 speed trans, trans brake
Diff: R180 STI rear end
Vehicle: MY99 WRX Wagon
Power: 586hp
Best E.T: 8.881@154mph
Engine: Stage 3 EJ20/25
Induction: Innovative GT76 Dual ballbearing, MOOD Motorsports FMIC, stock plenum/throttle body
Internals: TRP billet rods, Arias pistons, TRP headstuds, copper head gaskets
Igtnition: MSD DIS-2, MSD Blaster coil
Exhaust: TRP Headers, 3" exhaust
Engine Management: Microtech LTX-8
Boost Control: Innovative 42mm wastegate, Turbosmart eBoost 60psi
http://www.tonyrigoliperformance.com.au/projectcars.htm

They were just the first few I could fine. I'm sure there are plenty more.

If your brother REALLY has 700 Bhp then he should be better than 8.3s... Either there are some porkies somewhere, or he just can't drive... :D
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 1113
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:20 pm
Location: QLD

Post by Skegbudley »

At least 2 of those cars are autos. It doesn't say what the last one is.
Totaly different class of racing too. We are talking street cars that are driven to the track, raced & driven back home afterwards.
Once he gets into the 9's he is going to put the auto in. Then with some slicks and other stuff he will run some decent numbers.
At the moment he is still loosing a lot of rubber going down the track if you know what I mean.
GU Patrol with go better bits added
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:32 pm

Post by sad001 »

My brother in law has a 4 cylinder courier which he calls the time machine, reckons it's so slow that when you drive you actually go back in time
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:39 pm
Location: In a horse near you

Post by chimpboy »

Skegbudley wrote:Sober now. :oops:
I got 60' mixed up with 60mph. At this point I will blame Bundy bear. :D

Its sub 5sec.
1/4 mile: 10.0 sec @ 142mph
60 foot : 1.52 sec
Thats in full street trim. 422kw at all 4 wheels.
That's more believable. But regardless, I think we'll be hanging shit on you about the sub-2-second rex for a long time yet. :armsup:
This is not legal advice.
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

bj on roids wrote:Diesel landcruiser 80 series, all stock, I think its around high 20s

CBR1000RR (with work) high 3s :cool:
Okay, clearly I don't have enough balls :lol: (I'm getting old)

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index ... 627AAaiTJu

Mine should push a little under 3 seconds standard, and a little more with the work done.

But I still wouldn't be able to beat a WRX :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Fawk off.... i've never even seen one come close :roll:
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

*EDIT* I need to work on my starts, as I cannot get it to 100 in under 3 seconds :lol: :D
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

Moph wrote:Bro-in-law has a GQ with a somewhat worked RB30DET in it, running in the low 6's at the moment on a stock clutch. Major clutch slippage so a new one will be going in soon.
Low 6's to 100kph? Or low 6's 1/4 mile pass?

Your brothers patrol is Faster than his brothers WRX :lol:
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

Patroler wrote:A Bugatti veyron goes 0-100 in 2.8sec, would take a heck of a lot more power to shave .8 off of that - and its already got 1000hp to start with...
The veyron is a heavy lump-a-sh1t
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

bj on roids wrote:
Moph wrote:Bro-in-law has a GQ with a somewhat worked RB30DET in it, running in the low 6's at the moment on a stock clutch. Major clutch slippage so a new one will be going in soon.
Low 6's to 100kph? Or low 6's 1/4 mile pass?
na, low 6 minutes. the clutch is slipping remember... someone needs to change the thread title to PISSIN COMP

Image
Posts: 2472
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 4:17 pm
Location: Blaxland... Just up from Renriff!

Post by -Nemesis- »

What's the difference between comparing performance and comparing amount of flex, tyre size, custom bullbars etc etc? Everything on this site is a pissing contest in that regard.....

The good old if you aint interested, don't post I reckon. You guys will kill this thread, but some of us find it interesting (untill we got to the WRX padding...), especially if people be reasonable in the figures they produce. This is a vehicle enthusiasts website, 4WD based yeah, but who's rig is 100% off road based anyways, there's more to our trucks than just rock.


I've had the monster truck that's dangerous on road and handles like a boat, but insane off road. Now i've got a truck that's insane and safe (within drivers reasoning) ON road, and is just as fun off (less technical tracks) and I know which one I prefer in hindsight.

You slow bus drivers would only need one trip in the runner to be convinced that underpowered is boring, even in a big 4WD. Oh, and I bet mine is cheaper to run than you diesel tankers as well ;) :finger:
Lovin the FZJ105-T, bling by Ryano
Posts: 2158
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:16 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by KiwiBacon »

-Nemesis- wrote: You slow bus drivers would only need one trip in the runner to be convinced that underpowered is boring, even in a big 4WD. Oh, and I bet mine is cheaper to run than you diesel tankers as well ;) :finger:
The problem is "underpowered" is relative. No matter how much power you've got on tap, you quickly get used to it, even bored with it.

Cheaper to run? I've gotta hear the explanation on this one.
Posts: 2472
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 4:17 pm
Location: Blaxland... Just up from Renriff!

Post by -Nemesis- »

Sequential vapour injection LPG. 50c/L average. Travelling is around 13L/100km, around town getting into it a bit is around 18L/100 ;)

I know what you mean about not enough power, the bug. Like 4WD'ing ;)
Lovin the FZJ105-T, bling by Ryano
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 133 guests