Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Tailshaft Problems

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply
Posts: 163
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Tailshaft Problems

Post by Breaker Brother »

Getting closer to finishing the front end, so am starting to get ready making parts for the rear.

Have to replace the redundant old gearbox cross-member
Image

Main problem I've got is this.
Image

As you can see, Centre bearing is useless
Image

Pinion angle is perfect
Image

So....Remembering I plan to drive this @ highway speeds, do I
A: relocate the centre bearing to lessen the total angle and run a double carfin on the rear half shaft? mucking up my pinion angle and creating more work.

B: Use a one piece unit and just have a standard double cardin on the gearbox end.

C: get one of these and use a one piece shaft (remebering my suspension will droop almost foot further than it is now)
Image
Ban Warning labels and let Darwinism rule![img]http://www.downunder4x4.net/forum/images/smilies/pray.gif[/img]
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:59 pm
Location: South Gippsland

Post by hiluxmad »

i would go 1 peice and double cardin shaft i put a one peice in mine when i did the 60 series diffs(offset rear) and it does highway speeds(and more :twisted: ) just fine
Keep it shiny side up!
Now doing general fab work and painting
trays, trailers, engine swaps on request, some tube work, silo section sliders, rust repairs, ute chops etc
Posts: 658
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:41 pm
Location: Brissy

Post by yamaha__308 »

Lock in B, Eddy!

And check out this link:

http://www.pirate4x4.com/tech/billavist ... ndex2.html
Posts: 163
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Breaker Brother »

I'm leaning towards B for two reason, the first is obviously cost and the second is that I have to remove/modify the rear tailshaft cross-member anyway
Ban Warning labels and let Darwinism rule![img]http://www.downunder4x4.net/forum/images/smilies/pray.gif[/img]
Posts: 93
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 11:28 am
Location: Cardiff (Newcastle) NSW

Post by Athol »

I'd go with B provided that the unsupported length of the tailshaft (centre of front uni or Cardan joint to centre of rear uni) doesn't exceed 1.5m.

The angle across the rear uni should be no less than 0.5 degrees but as close to that as possible. The driveline vibration created by the overall effective angle goes up as the square of the angle in degrees, and a Cardan joint is a CV with an angle of zero within itself so the effective angle will be the rear angle.

The reason for the minimum of 0.5 degrees is that less than that will cause the uni to fail prematurely because the rollers will embed themselves into the trunnion and cups because they're not rolling enough.

If you decide to stay with 2-piece, run a Cardan joint at the transfer, remount the centrebearing square to the tailshaft and set the centrebearing height so that the front shaft and the diff pinion are parallel but still have at least the 0.5 degree operating angle across the unis. The 2 uni joints will cancel each other out in terms of vibration and can be safely up to 6 degrees without a problem. Beyond that it depends on the unis.
Posts: 163
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Breaker Brother »

Athol wrote:I'd go with B provided that the unsupported length of the tailshaft (centre of front uni or Cardan joint to centre of rear uni) doesn't exceed 1.5m.

The angle across the rear uni should be no less than 0.5 degrees but as close to that as possible. The driveline vibration created by the overall effective angle goes up as the square of the angle in degrees, and a Cardan joint is a CV with an angle of zero within itself so the effective angle will be the rear angle.

The reason for the minimum of 0.5 degrees is that less than that will cause the uni to fail prematurely because the rollers will embed themselves into the trunnion and cups because they're not rolling enough.

If you decide to stay with 2-piece, run a Cardan joint at the transfer, remount the centrebearing square to the tailshaft and set the centrebearing height so that the front shaft and the diff pinion are parallel but still have at least the 0.5 degree operating angle across the unis. The 2 uni joints will cancel each other out in terms of vibration and can be safely up to 6 degrees without a problem. Beyond that it depends on the unis.
As Usual Athol, your advise is greatly appreciated on this forum. thanks again!
Ban Warning labels and let Darwinism rule![img]http://www.downunder4x4.net/forum/images/smilies/pray.gif[/img]
Posts: 3288
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 10:15 pm
Location: Central West NSW

Post by Slunnie »

From experience, what would worry me about running a DC on that angle, is that even with larger uni joints, the centre bearing doesn't last long.
Cheers
Slunnie

Discovery TD5, Landy IIa V8 ute.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests