Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
front tail shaft angle
front tail shaft angle
whats the best way to solve the problem of my front tail shaft angle being to steep?
cheers pete
cheers pete
Bad caster? what do you mean? why are plates the worst option? I only ask because I fixed my angle issues with plates and the only difference i've noticed is lighter steering so if I've inadvertently created other issues that I haven't noticed yet it might be a good idea to redo my front diff while I have it apart next.11_evl wrote: deal with really bad caster and fit plates is the worst option
Cheers
Plates are the worst option because anything that reduces cater in a sierra is a terrible idea- at any height, let alone at the 5" of lift or so that would result in fouling the crossmember.
I don't understand why anyone would take caster OUT of the front end of a sierra to fix a problem that's really a symptom of the car being way too high.
If it's already that high it needs all the caster you can give it keep it handling properly, so cutting and rotating the knuckles might be the better option, however, I'm still going to say lowering the car would be the best option overall because not only will you be able to run plates to increase[/] rather than decrease caster, you'll benefit from the added stability and handling of the lower COG as well.
Steve.
I don't understand why anyone would take caster OUT of the front end of a sierra to fix a problem that's really a symptom of the car being way too high.
If it's already that high it needs all the caster you can give it keep it handling properly, so cutting and rotating the knuckles might be the better option, however, I'm still going to say lowering the car would be the best option overall because not only will you be able to run plates to increase[/] rather than decrease caster, you'll benefit from the added stability and handling of the lower COG as well.
Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Re: front tail shaft angle
what is it doing?.....vibrating?....binding?Petesarmy wrote:whats the best way to solve the problem of my front tail shaft angle being to steep?
cheers pete
lwb 1.6efi,4sp auto,f&r airlockers,dual t/cases.custom coils.builder of ROAD LEGAL custom suzukis...and other stuff.
CAD modelling-TECH drawings-DXF preparation.
http://www.auszookers.com/index.php
CAD modelling-TECH drawings-DXF preparation.
http://www.auszookers.com/index.php
A hilux shaft will not permit more total angle than a sierra shaft. It just permits more angle at one end than the other.
If you want to stay the height you car, you might be able to cut and turn the knuckles to raise the pinion, and run a hilux shaft with the double cardan joint at the transfer end. This should work, but may take some crossmember work to clear the bulk of DC shaft.
You can lower your car to clear the problem. 35's have been cleared with zero suspension lift.
Steve.
If you want to stay the height you car, you might be able to cut and turn the knuckles to raise the pinion, and run a hilux shaft with the double cardan joint at the transfer end. This should work, but may take some crossmember work to clear the bulk of DC shaft.
You can lower your car to clear the problem. 35's have been cleared with zero suspension lift.
Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
are you sure??Gwagensteve wrote:A hilux shaft will not permit more total angle than a sierra shaft. It just permits more angle at one end than the other.
Steve.
i dont no for the front but im sure that when i went hi lux tailshaft for the rear of my car it had noticabley better angle.
my temp fix for the front shaft was to grind away the parts where it rubs
michael
Agreed.. when i used lux shafts i got HEAPS more angle. I was using an early model lux shaft.. had about the same as the zook shaft. Double cardon joints give you bugga all angle. The later model shafts offer heaps more angle in the uni's..11_evl wrote:are you sure??Gwagensteve wrote:A hilux shaft will not permit more total angle than a sierra shaft.
Steve.
i dont no for the front but im sure that when i went hi lux tailshaft for the rear of my car it had noticabley better angle.
F&R ARB air lockers, lux diffs, 4 link coil rear, drop shackles, inboarded ranchos, stage 4 reduction gears, 35" silverstones, 9500 winch, RUF, 1.6 EFI, swimming goggles
Hilux tailshafts do allow more uni angle, not huge amounts, but maybe enough to be useful. DC joints suck for large angles, had to get rid of the one on my fathers hilux as it bound up on full front suspension droop (now has a single uni both ends and has ample clearance).
Wheeling on completely wicked angles, without even looking stable.
God Of Emo
Posts: 7350
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 7:04 pm
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 7:04 pm
Location: Newy, home of the ZOOK (Rockin the 'diff)
Contact:
just found an old post of mine..
Had some more dramas with uni angles.. the standard lux uni was crashing on itself.. after a bit of researching.. i found a slip joint out of a 85 lux (DC joint end), which has heaps more angle!! Heres the difference
Had some more dramas with uni angles.. the standard lux uni was crashing on itself.. after a bit of researching.. i found a slip joint out of a 85 lux (DC joint end), which has heaps more angle!! Heres the difference
F&R ARB air lockers, lux diffs, 4 link coil rear, drop shackles, inboarded ranchos, stage 4 reduction gears, 35" silverstones, 9500 winch, RUF, 1.6 EFI, swimming goggles
God Of Emo
Posts: 7350
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 7:04 pm
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 7:04 pm
Location: Newy, home of the ZOOK (Rockin the 'diff)
Contact:
The yanks often refer to a Double Cardan joint as a CV joint, as technically the two uni's in a DC joint do cancel out each others phaseing as they rotate at angle.david123 wrote:Is there such a thing as a CV joint for suzis like high lift Jeeps have.
Layto....
[quote="v840"]Just between me and you, I actually really dig the Megatwon, but if anyone asks, I'm going to shitcan it as much as possible! :D[/quote]
and because a double cardan joint is two unis in one unit, it cancels out the velocity variations inherent in a single uni.
Therefore, for a double cardan joint to work it must have ALL the angle of the shaft on it - the other end of the shaft must have the smallest angle possible.
So with a DC joint in practise, you point the pinion at the transfer case and the DC goes at the transfer case end.
Steve.
Therefore, for a double cardan joint to work it must have ALL the angle of the shaft on it - the other end of the shaft must have the smallest angle possible.
So with a DC joint in practise, you point the pinion at the transfer case and the DC goes at the transfer case end.
Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests