Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Mud tyres33 x 10.5x 15

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:52 pm
Location: sw vic

Mud tyres33 x 10.5x 15

Post by coat »

Im about to replace my bfg muddies 33x 12.5 x 15 and want to go less width this time.. Im happy enouth to go bfg again and wondered wat other peoples thoughts were on this. Should i go 10.5 or stay 12.5
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by grimbo »

10.5
Ransom note = demand + collage
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:39 pm
Location: In a horse near you

Post by chimpboy »

grimbo wrote:10.5
x2

(I mean, I agree with 10.5. I don't mean "10.5 x 2", or 21.)

I have seen narrower tyres do better than wide ones in mud too many times.
This is not legal advice.
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:45 pm
Location: YES

Post by THICKNICK »

correct me if im wrong, wouldnt a wider tyre be more stable. as overall edge of tyre to edge of other tyre you are gonna lose 50mm in width.
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by grimbo »

what do you mean more stable? An extra inch each side isn't going to do much and the negatives of running a completley square contact patch outweigh the maybe once in a blue moon benefit of having a slightly wider track width.
Ransom note = demand + collage
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:45 pm
Location: YES

Post by THICKNICK »

you see everyone putting cruiser offset rims on patrol just for the wider track = bit more stability, same as 25mm wider tyres. also depends on what sort of driving your vehicle will be doing, my driving i would want something a bit more stable even the smallest amount.

can someone also explain the benefits of a narrower tyre to a wider one.
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:39 pm
Location: In a horse near you

Post by chimpboy »

THICKNICK wrote:can someone also explain the benefits of a narrower tyre to a wider one.
I can't explain it but I've seen narrower tyres go well in mud even when wider tyres with better tread struggled in the same spot.

The theory I heard was that the narrow ones sink through the soft stuff and bite into the hard stuff underneath it, while the wide ones "float" more. True or not? I don't know.
This is not legal advice.
Posts: 1912
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:15 pm
Location: VIC

Post by beinthemud »

chimpboy wrote:
grimbo wrote:10.5
x2

(I mean, I agree with 10.5. I don't mean "10.5 x 2", or 21.)

I have seen narrower tyres do better than wide ones in mud too many times.
Very true my Dad told me when I was young and hes never wrong :roll:
Narrow mud
wide sand
Tryed to find 33 x 10.5 gave up and went 33 x 13.5
Manuels= 4wd,cars,bikes,guns,trucks,race cars
Automatics=washing machines,dish washers,fridges
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:52 pm
Location: sw vic

Post by coat »

Thanks guys.. Recon ill go bfg muddies 10.5 as i dond think there are anyothers around in 33
Posts: 1912
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:15 pm
Location: VIC

Post by beinthemud »

Maybe 10.5s were the way to go during world war 2
when they were under landrovers and jeeps and there wasent much rubber around becaause everyone was making bullets
Manuels= 4wd,cars,bikes,guns,trucks,race cars
Automatics=washing machines,dish washers,fridges
Posts: 1048
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 9:48 am
Location: Waikerie; SA

Post by Eddy »

beinthemud wrote:Maybe 10.5s were the way to go during world war 2
when they were under landrovers and jeeps and there wasent much rubber around becaause everyone was making bullets
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


:roll:


:shock:





:?




words fail me ...
'03 Mazda Bravo Plus
'80 Datto 720 Ute
'77 Leyland Terrier Truck ... yes a real truck
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:39 pm
Location: In a horse near you

Post by chimpboy »

beinthemud wrote:Maybe 10.5s were the way to go during world war 2
when they were under landrovers and jeeps and there wasent much rubber around becaause everyone was making bullets
Very likely, what with all the rubber bullets they defended our shores with.
This is not legal advice.
Posts: 435
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 2:41 pm
Location: Perth

Post by steel »

THICKNICK wrote:
can someone also explain the benefits of a narrower tyre to a wider one.
ill try and explain why narrower tyres are better in soft conditions, ie: mud and sand.
when driving in soft sand, the sand mounds up in front of the tyres making it hard on the vehicle as if you are constantly trying to climb up a little hill.
the wider your tyres are the wider the mounds of sand are that you are pushing forward.
a narrow tyre with a tall sidewall will allow a nice long footprint when deflated and will give the best results in THESE conditions.

I run 37 inch { 930mm O.D ) tyres which are 10.5 inches (255mm) wide and they work great allround and i have 2 mates running 33/10.5/15 BFG muds.
Posts: 624
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:40 pm
Location: Albany, WA

Post by Kitika »

I was running 750R16 on the 80 for awhile and on sand dunes they were awesome never would have expected it because they are pencil thin! I'm all for skinny tyres for all offroad situations and they get slightly better fuel economy over wider tyres.
More Suzuki parts going to the big Suzuki Heaven in the sky!
Posts: 1912
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:15 pm
Location: VIC

Post by beinthemud »

Yup maybe but they look ghay as
Manuels= 4wd,cars,bikes,guns,trucks,race cars
Automatics=washing machines,dish washers,fridges
Posts: 624
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:40 pm
Location: Albany, WA

Post by Kitika »

It's ok you won't be able to see them from the bottom of the dune :D
More Suzuki parts going to the big Suzuki Heaven in the sky!
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by grimbo »

beinthemud wrote:Yup maybe but they look ghay as
yep because that's what;'s all about, how the 4wd looks. Don't worry about making it perform better just don't look ghay. If that's the case I think you're probably on the wrong website try a Jeep forum perhaps. :D
Ransom note = demand + collage
Posts: 435
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 2:41 pm
Location: Perth

Post by steel »

beinthemud wrote:Yup maybe but they look ghay as
Only ghay's worry about how they look :armsup:
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

grimbo wrote:
beinthemud wrote:Yup maybe but they look ghay as
yep because that's what;'s all about, how the 4wd looks. Don't worry about making it perform better just don't look ghay. If that's the case I think you're probably on the wrong website try a Jeep forum perhaps. :D
Bling is teh all important to the kiddies these days.
Master of my own domain
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:01 pm
Location: Shellharbour, NSW

Post by mike_nofx »

coat wrote:Thanks guys.. Recon ill go bfg muddies 10.5 as i dond think there are anyothers around in 33
Silverstone make 10.5 wide 33's. But if you can fit 33x12.5 BFG muds, you can probably fit 35x10.5" Silverstone xtremes. (their sizing is a little out. The 35's are closer to 33's)

And they make the BFG muds look like all-terrains. Very cheap too.

http://www.4x4typ.ru/market/pic/t/ta5600_b.jpg
Posts: 435
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 2:41 pm
Location: Perth

Post by steel »

other manufacturers that make a 33/10.5 are maxxis and kelly. ;)
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:39 pm
Location: In a horse near you

Post by chimpboy »

steel wrote:
beinthemud wrote:Yup maybe but they look ghay as
Only ghay's worry about how they look :armsup:
But I want my car to look more mathculine!
This is not legal advice.
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:52 pm
Location: sw vic

Post by coat »

Thanks mike but im after a mud terrain that will be used on the road mostly with a bit of mud work thrown in.. Ive got a set of simex that were my off road tyre but selling them as dont get away to use them anymore..
I will check out the maxxis and kelly range aswell but on thinking about it i might stick with what i know.. The BFG Muddies
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: melbourne

Post by mmaaxx »

steel wrote:other manufacturers that make a 33/10.5 are maxxis and kelly. ;)
maxxis dont make a 33/10.5x15....they make a 255/85x16 in the bigohrn which is 33.3x10.3x16

simex make alot of tall and narrow tyres as do Interco with their swamper brands....
[url]http://www.monsterrides.com.au[/url]
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:34 pm
Location: N/E Victoria

Post by 12ht »

Eddy wrote:
beinthemud wrote:Maybe 10.5s were the way to go during world war 2
when they were under landrovers and jeeps and there wasent much rubber around becaause everyone was making bullets
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


:roll:


:shock: x2





:?




words fail me ...
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:50 pm
Location: new zealand

Post by gonfellon »

i ran 34x10.5x16 tsl's
that cut deep in mud like simex or silverstone
but cut deep in sand like shovels at low speeds
or fluffy sand or foot down up hills
or taking off in sand
where my mate was in same kind of truck
but with 12.5 mt/r's didnt have same
problems in sand and they preformed good in mud
i run 13.5s wide now and no problems
on sand running road pressure.
i would say wider the better for sand as more
weight displaced over a greater area
saying that in the army there was a
formula for weight /wheelbase/terrain for tires
that why l/rovers had skinny s.a.t's
and different tires for sand/snow
and pull artillery around behind them
and still do since ww2
lol that might be why most other 4x4's have fat tires
to keep up with landies???
old horse n karts and vintage cars had skinny wheels
for mud roads and it seemed to work
but Imo stick with 12.5s for a bigger foot print in sand
10.5 in a bigger tire can run lower psi
to make them bag out to get a bigger foot print too
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:50 pm
Location: new zealand

Post by gonfellon »

Pirelli Scorpion MUD 33/12.5R15
but they are 12.9"
and abit cheaper than bfg's
but wouldnt no how good they are compared to
bfg's
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by grimbo »

comparing a TSL to a MTR is a bit unfair. Tyre design will be the issue there more so than tyre size

Width is not what you want it is length and that is what happens when you air down your tyre, you lengthen the footprint
Ransom note = demand + collage
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

grimbo wrote:comparing a TSL to a MTR is a bit unfair.
shhhhhhh...... hes on a roll... :rofl: :lol: :lol: :rofl:
Posts: 435
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 2:41 pm
Location: Perth

Post by steel »

[quote="gonfellon"]i ran 34x10.5x16 tsl's
that cut deep in mud like simex or silverstone
but cut deep in sand like shovels at low speeds
or fluffy sand or foot down up hills
or taking off in sand
where my mate was in same kind of truck
but with 12.5 mt/r's didnt have same
problems in sand and they preformed good in mud
i run 13.5s wide now and no problems
on sand running road pressure.
i would say wider the better for sand as more
weight displaced over a greater area


This has been the topic around many a camp fire, along with the " which tread pattern is best in sand " discussion, and its been proven again and again on beaches and dunes all over WA that narrow tyres are better in sand.
sometimes the exception to this rule is if you are running at road pressures.
driving in sand with narrow heavily treaded tyres may require a change in driving technique, with a little more finesse with the clutch and more restraint with the right pedal, for example, this tosser im unfortunate to know would dig himm self into holes quite regularly on the beach, but after fitting a 350 chev and 35/12.5/15's he's buried alot quicker and alot more often now.
The moral is you've got to learn to adjust your driving style to suit more than just your mood and doug's useless behind the wheel -- there its been said --
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 120 guests