The absolute worst case for rolling weight is it's worth twice as much static weight.chimpboy wrote:Hmm, I dunno.
Maybe you can clarify something for me actually, as I'm not thinking clearly tonight.
Heavy wheels/tyres are going to chew more fuel on take-off for obvious reasons. But does it take more energy to go from 0-5km/h than it does to go from (say) 90 to 95km/h?
If it's the same, then I think heavy tyres could have an effect on fuel economy in all kinds of driving.
On the other hand I feel it might be different but I can't see why.
Either way I think it is a bigger issue than gearing.
So an extra 10kg on your tyres is similar to 20kg on the vehicle.
If you take 100kg off a 2.3 ton vehicle, how much is your economy going to improve?
I'd wager an almost unmeasureable amount. It's not 5% of the total weight and weight is still a minor player, well behind aerodynamics.
If you'd like a quick lesson in the difference in rolling resistance of different tread patterns and pressures, try riding a mountainbike with a range of tyres.
You'll find that weight only slows acceleration and means nothing overall on a trip. But tread pattern and pressure can take almost 50% off your cruising speed.
KE70, you've missed the point about efficiency and gearing.