Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Do Sierra's cut it?

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Post Reply
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:54 pm
Location: Melbourne

Do Sierra's cut it?

Post by MuddySierra »

Im kind of new to the scene and wondering how the good 'ol sierras hold up in the 4wd world, As I plan on purchasing one for this exact purpose.

What are troubles that most people have and can these be bypassed by buying a different vehicle. As you can see I'm quite interested in getting a little beast but want to go every where others go so just being realistic.

Are the motors fine for 4wding in a stock sierra?

Thanks in advance for your answers!
Posts: 904
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:10 pm
Location: Perth

Post by mrRocky »

They arnt like driving other 4x4's they are totally different because of there size. Best to go out with a bunch of others when u first get one to learn how to drive it.
You should be more worried about the other 4x4's keeping up with a stock sierra. They are slow but other than that, there the best 4x4 ever made.
_____

[olllllo]
Posts: 736
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:32 pm
Location: brisbane

Post by gumtree »

dont worry about their 4x4 ability, it's great.

strength is very strong.

1.3 are a bit slow but put-up-able, can definatly take a floging and dont mind being reved.

parts are readily available and not expensive.

very fun car.

very straight forward to work on.

comfort is below avg.

their biggest flaw is potential for rust. most cases are curable and preventable if rust is found.
1993 LWB vitara, Front & Rear alloy bars, towbar, spotties, UHF.
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Perth, WA

Post by alien »

yep- buy one and drive it stock for at least 6 months before even considering any mods. You'll be suprised - even if unpleasantly suprised by how uncomfortable they are on a long drive lol - but its worth it.
The worst thing about censorship is ███████.
Posts: 351
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 9:47 am
Location: Canberra

Post by DiddyZook »

Hmmm A vehicle which has not been available for well over a decade, but still very popular.

A vehicle which regularly competes (and finishes, often on podium) in most 4WD comps in the land.

The humble Sierra is an awesome little 4WD, it is far more capable than most, definitely cheaper and certainly fun to drive.

Only drawbacks are as said, comfort and size if you want to take the whole family.
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 2:39 am
Location: Perth

Post by drifta »

if comfort and power bothers you (the main flaws of the sierra) get a vitara... they arent quite as hardcore offroad, but they make up for it with the extra power and comfort

and, I like the extra challenge offroad =)
found a 3door 1.6L efi vitara =) pm me for 4x4ing around perth
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

http://vic.suzuki4wd.com

Melbourne is probably the best state in Australia to own a sierra as the best driving is so close to the city. It's quite feasible to put up with a car that's not terribly good on the highway when you only have to drive an hour to hit the tracks.

We've had countless members sell their sierras and regret it, or buy a bigger car thinking it ill be more capable and also regret it. You won't have more fun in a 4WD than in a sierra.

*shameless plug* There's also a a pretty handy little club in Vic that can help you with technical questions and trips...

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 5714
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2002 3:55 pm
Location: Perth WA.

Post by nicbeer »

im going to regret getting rid of mine but WA is more touring / longer trips unfort.

but to the orig poster, grab a sierra and dont look back if u want bang for buck offroad fun :)
[url=http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/viewtopic.php?p=930942#930942&highlight=]Zook[/url]
U SUK Zook Built and Sold.
New rig is 97 80 DX. 2" list 33s
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:54 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by MuddySierra »

Ok so I was thinking that you guys where going to tell me to get something else but it is now nice to have confirmation thanks all for your answers you have made my decision quite easy!

Looking forward in the next 3 or so months hitting the tracks with some of you!

Brad
Posts: 2585
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 4:45 pm
Location: SYDNEY

Post by thehanko »

be prepared that the gearing in sierras is difficult, its the only real down side to a sierra imho.

They rev very hard to do 100-110, but their offroad gearing is average (too high).

The offroad gearing can be rectified fairly easily by changing to a 1L tranny or getting a gearset put in, but this makes them evern worse on the hwy by 12-20%.

This is why it was mentioned that melbourne is so good as you dont need to drive far to go offroad.

but they go amasingly well offroad with a small amount of work. its kind of annoying :oops: :lol:
*there's a rock, drive over it :) there's a bigger rock, drive over it :twisted: there's an even bigger rock, oops broke it :oops: Upgrade broken bit :bad-words:
Goto *
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 2:39 am
Location: Perth

Post by drifta »

thehanko wrote:be prepared that the gearing in sierras is difficult, its the only real down side to a sierra imho.

They rev very hard to do 100-110, but their offroad gearing is average (too high).

The offroad gearing can be rectified fairly easily by changing to a 1L tranny or getting a gearset put in, but this makes them evern worse on the hwy by 12-20%.

This is why it was mentioned that melbourne is so good as you dont need to drive far to go offroad.

but they go amasingly well offroad with a small amount of work. its kind of annoying :oops: :lol:

If you have seen myself and nickbeer and a few others you will know that the solution to this is to DRIVE FASTER offroad!.. its more fun that way anyhow!

and if you need more power to push the gears, (along with extra comfort) get a vitara!
found a 3door 1.6L efi vitara =) pm me for 4x4ing around perth
Posts: 624
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:40 pm
Location: Albany, WA

Post by Kitika »

They rev very hard to do 100-110, but their offroad gearing is average (too high).
Suzuki did a good job on the high range gearing as the motor is in its sweet spot at 100kmh with stock tyres. It is a small motor and it makes most its power above 3grand. I get sub 9L/100km which is pretty good for the brick shape aerodynamics of the zook and its apparent high revs. Try putting bigger tyres on and lowering the revs it will suck more juice than a cruiser or pootrawler.
More Suzuki parts going to the big Suzuki Heaven in the sky!
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Perth, WA

Post by alien »

dunno - with 31" simex ETs, SPOA and 1.6L EFI engine, im still netting about 10L to 100km... but with about 6L missing from my fuel tank (dented) and an uncorrected odometer, and a busted fuel guage - its kinda hard to be super accurate =) lol

But still - its not near the 16L per 100 that some of the bigger 4x4s of the same era will get.
The worst thing about censorship is ███████.
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

There absolutely nothing wrong with the gearing of a 100% stock sierra. They need to pull 3500rpm @ 100km/h - any less and they can't hold road speed in 5th gear. Funny that a manufacturer would know how to gear a car. :roll:

Likewise, off road, they are geared very well for a 26" tyre with no grip. All the gearing issues start once tyre size is increased and grip is increased.

It is possible to lower cruising revs with a larger tyre, but doing so requires an engine with significantly higher torque at lower revs. There's no other way.

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 2585
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 4:45 pm
Location: SYDNEY

Post by thehanko »

Gwagensteve wrote:There absolutely nothing wrong with the gearing of a 100% stock sierra. They need to pull 3500rpm @ 100km/h - any less and they can't hold road speed in 5th gear. Funny that a manufacturer would know how to gear a car. :roll:

Likewise, off road, they are geared very well for a 26" tyre with no grip. All the gearing issues start once tyre size is increased and grip is increased.

It is possible to lower cruising revs with a larger tyre, but doing so requires an engine with significantly higher torque at lower revs. There's no other way.

Steve.
This is true, however its the combination of low performance engine and lack of gearing options is what im pointing out.

Even with 27inch tyres you tend to have to either run to fast or ride the clutch. either of which im not a fan of. personal point of view.

But the thing is most people here dont drive std sierras, the run bigger tyres bigger engines etc and trying to find a good combination of gearing for on and off road is difficult.

Thats the only poinbt i was trying to make, its not like getting into any of the bigger trucks where you can do alot more without worrying about high range or low range drivability/ speed control.
Funny that a manufacturer would know how to gear a car.

I personally dont think they got it quite right for stock in the low range and to alter this you always alter your high range gearing as well.

Its the lack of ability to alter low range without effecting high range with which I get frustrated.

Anyway I just wanted to make the OP aware of this limitation as for me its been hair pulling frustration. but then you get over it :lol:
*there's a rock, drive over it :) there's a bigger rock, drive over it :twisted: there's an even bigger rock, oops broke it :oops: Upgrade broken bit :bad-words:
Goto *
Posts: 736
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:32 pm
Location: brisbane

Post by gumtree »

sierras seem to use 10L/100 no matter what u do to them, bigger tyres, foot flat or gently driving doesn't make a huge difference only very minor.



another vote for sierra's could have made the low range first couple gears lower. Jeeps factory low range go alot slower, there's no reason why sierras could have the same ratio's to suit thier tyre size.

the high range is great, no faults there.
1993 LWB vitara, Front & Rear alloy bars, towbar, spotties, UHF.
Posts: 624
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:40 pm
Location: Albany, WA

Post by Kitika »

This is true, however its the combination of low performance engine and lack of gearing options is what im pointing out.

Even with 27inch tyres you tend to have to either run to fast or ride the clutch. either of which im not a fan of. personal point of view.

But the thing is most people here dont drive std sierras, the run bigger tyres bigger engines etc and trying to find a good combination of gearing for on and off road is difficult.

Thats the only poinbt i was trying to make, its not like getting into any of the bigger trucks where you can do alot more without worrying about high range or low range drivability/ speed control.
There are heaps of gearing combos for pre coily sierra transfer cases and diff gears combos be it from other suzuki's models or from aftermarket. If you are running bigger tyres a simple transfer gear swap is good for up to 32 inch tyres and I find my 6.5's perfect on road in high range keeping the motor in the sweet spot and low range is almost too slow in some situations. If you are going bigger in tyre again you'll just have to change the dif ratio to one of the many different ratios. Also why would you only want to change the low range ratios if you were running bigger tyres? Even with a 1.6 you'd probably be running far to high a ratio on the blacktop ever tried to drive a WT sierra with tyres bigger than 29inch with stock gearing?
The clutch don't like it at all...
More Suzuki parts going to the big Suzuki Heaven in the sky!
Posts: 2600
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Townsville

Post by GRPABT1 »

thehanko wrote: Its the lack of ability to alter low range without effecting high range with which I get frustrated.
I couldn't agree less! I think what sucks about the larger trucks is not being able to alter the high range gearing. Even look at vitaras, they all end up with sierra transfers or twin transfers to rectify the shitty gearing. Sierras aren't diesels that like to chug, they love to rev, and if you chuck bigger tyres on then you'll still wanna rev them like before and you can with the right gearset (of which there are many available). Even in your big truck diesels and modern common rail jobbies, the manufacturer usually places the motor in it's sweet spot rev range when in the correct gear at normal road speeds. going up 5 inches in tyre diameter (which is small for modified suzuki standards) or more will negatively affect the power in most trucks out there on road without changing the high range gearing.
Build Thread - http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=168546&p=1927514&hilit=GRPABT1%27s+zook#p1927514
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by BAD70Y »

Just my 2 cents worth, Do IT!
I agree 100% with Gwagensteve & alien
start off standard have some fun
then when it is time to mod your zook read the bible as 99% of your question have been ask before!

PS. If I was to build another Zook I would,
1.6l efi and radiator
6.4 trailtough gears with reinforced transfer case mount
HD axles
reinforced diff housing with torque bar
standard diff under with flat leaf springs and HD shakles
matt pisani's (m&m engineering) high steer
33x10 tyres with beadlock rims
ARB air lockers, so I have the option to run open diffs to make things interesting on the trail
and a couple other small things

I miss my Zook :cry:
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Perth, WA

Post by alien »

BAD70Y wrote:PS. If I was to build another Zook I would,
Spend lots of money on it

I miss my bottomless money pit :cry:
fixed =) haha
The worst thing about censorship is ███████.
Posts: 2585
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 4:45 pm
Location: SYDNEY

Post by thehanko »

alien wrote:
BAD70Y wrote:PS. If I was to build another Zook I would,
Spend lots of money on it

I miss my bottomless money pit :cry:
fixed =) haha
yeah but its fun isnt it :lol: all work no money pit makes an unhappy boy
*there's a rock, drive over it :) there's a bigger rock, drive over it :twisted: there's an even bigger rock, oops broke it :oops: Upgrade broken bit :bad-words:
Goto *
Posts: 654
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Central Coast

Post by Bentzook »

Never regret owning a zook, you got to own a few first then own a full size rig only to come back to the zook. Take 5 years building the Gravitron, waste a lot of coin getting someone else help build what they think yo want, only to bring it home, strip it and start again. But its all fun when you can drive up walking tracks through thick scrub. Fun, fun, fun.


this ramp has been approved to backyard Australian standards

Image
"Gravitron " : drives the first layer of Gravity
Posts: 6221
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 12:51 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by v840 »

Bags to coils to coilovers, man, you've had some suspension under that rig.



Howsabout updating your build thread in members? I always really liked your zook!
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|.........SUZUKI..........| ||'|";, ____.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ]
(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests